Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-plnhv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-08-20T11:11:49.952Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Local Connectedness of the stone-Čech Compactification

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

D. Baboolal
D. Baboolal*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Durban-Westville Private Bag X54001, Durban 4000
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A uniform space X is said to be uniformly locally connected if given any entourage U there exists an entourage V ⊂ U such that V[x] is connected for each x ∈ X. It is said to have property S if given any entourage U, X can be written as a finite union of connected sets each of which is U-small.

Based on these two uniform connection properties, another proof is given of the following well known result in the theory of locally connected spaces: The Stone-Čech compactification βX is locally connected if and only if X is locally connected and pseudocompact.

Keywords

Uniform local connectednessproperty S54D0554D3554E15

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Mathematical Bulletin , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , 01 June 1988 , pp. 236 - 240
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1988

References

1. Baboolal, D. and Ori, R. G., On uniform connection properties, Comment. Math. Univ. Carolinae. 24, 4 (1983), pp. 747–754.Google Scholar
2. Banaschewski, B., Local connectedness of extension spaces, Canadian J. Math., Vol. 8 (1956), pp. 395–398.Google Scholar
3. Collins, P. J., On uniform connection properties, Amer. Math. Monthly, Vol. 78, No. 4 (1971), pp. 372–374.Google Scholar
4. Doss, R., On continuous functions in uniform spaces, Ann. of Math., Vol. 18 (1947), pp. 843–844.Google Scholar
5. Gillman, L. and Jerison, M., Rings of continuous functions, Springer-Verlag, New York, Heidelberg, Berlin (1960).Google Scholar
6. Gleason, A. M., Universal locally connected refinements, Illinois J. Math. 7 (1963), pp. 521–531.Google Scholar
7. Henriksen, M. and Isbell, J. R., Local connectedness in the Stone-Čech compactification, Illinois J. Math., Vol. 1 (1957), pp. 574–582.Google Scholar
8. Kelley, J. L., General topology, Springer-Verlag, New York, Heidelberg, Berlin, (1955).Google Scholar
9. Wulbert, D. E., A characterization of C(X) for locally connected X, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 21 (1969), pp. 269–272.Google Scholar
10. Whyburn, G. T., Analytic topology, Amer. Math. Soc. Colloq. Publ. Vol. 28 (1942).Google Scholar