Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-xh45t Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-09T18:27:20.352Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Concept of Legitimacy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 October 2022

N. P. Adams Open the ORCID record for N. P. Adams [Opens in a new window]
N. P. Adams*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
*
Email: npadams@virginia.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I argue that legitimacy discourses serve a gatekeeping function. They give practitioners telic standards for riding herd on social practices, ensuring that minimally acceptable versions of the practice are implemented. Such a function is a necessary part of implementing formalized social practices, especially including law. This gatekeeping account shows that political philosophers have misunderstood legitimacy. It is not secondary to justice and only necessary because we cannot agree about justice; instead, it is a necessary feature of actual human social practices, which must be implemented via practitioners’ discretion in changing contexts.

Keywords

Legitimacyjusticelawsocial practicesroles

Information

Type
Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 52 , Issue 4 , May 2022 , pp. 381 - 395
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Canadian Journal of Philosophy

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Adams, N. P. 2021. “In Defense of Exclusionary Reasons.” Philosophical Studies 178: 235–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bicchieri, Cristina. 2016. Norms in the Wild. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Translated by Nice, Richard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, Geoffrey, Eriksson, Lina, Goodin, Robert E., and Southwood, Nicholas. 2013. Explaining Norms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, Allen. 2018. “Institutional Legitimacy.” In Oxford Studies in Political Philosophy Vol. 4, edited by Sobel, David, Vallentyne, Peter, and Wall, Steven, 53–80. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Buchanan, Allen, and Keohane, Robert O.. 2006. “The Legitimacy of Global Governance Institutions.” Ethics & International Affairs 20 (4): 405–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalmers, David J. 2011. “Verbal Disputes.” Philosophical Review 120 (4): 515–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiano, Thomas. 2008. The Constitution of Equality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Jean L. 2012. Globalization and Sovereignty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1978. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 2011. Justice for Hedgehogs. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Freeman, Samuel. 2007. Rawls. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geach, P. T. 1956. “Good and Evil.” Analysis 17 (2): 33–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gieryn, Thomas F. 1983. “Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists.” American Sociological Review 48 (6): 781–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms. 2nd ed. Translated by Rehg, William. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1985. “Civil Disobedience: Litmus Test for the Democratic Constitutional State.” Berkeley Journal of Sociology 30: 95–116.Google Scholar
Hohfeld, Wesley Newcomb. 1919. Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied to Judicial Reasoning. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lamont, Michèle, and Molnár, Virág. 2002. “The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences.” Annual Review of Sociology 28: 167–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larmore, Charles. 2020. What Is Political Philosophy? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Langvatn, Silje. 2016. “Legitimate, but Unjust; Just, but Illegitimate: Rawls on Political Legitimacy.” Philosophy and Social Criticism 42 (2): 132–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“legitime, adj. and n.” March 2022. OED Online, Oxford University Press. www.oed.com/view/Entry/107120. Last accessed 11 April 2022.Google Scholar
March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P.. 2011. “The Logic of Appropriateness.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Science, edited by Goodin, Robert E., 478–97. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Seamus. 2010. The Moral Foundations of Social Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morris, Christopher W. 1998. An Essay on the Modern State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, Douglas C. 1991. “Institutions.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 5 (1): 97–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, Philip. 2019. “The Control Theory of Legitimacy.” In Legitimacy, edited by Sadurski, Wojciech, Sevel, Michael, and Walton, Kevin, 7–31. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. 1999. A Theory of Justice. Rev. ed. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. 2005. Political Liberalism. Exp. ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ritchie, Katherine. 2020. “Social Structures and the Ontology of Social Groups.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 100 (2): 402–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sangiovanni, Andrea. 2019. “Debating the EU’s Raison d’Etre: On the Relation between Legitimacy and Justice.” Journal of Common Market Studies 57 (1): 13–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schauer, Frederick. 1991. Playing by the Rules. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Searle, John. 2010. Making the Social World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sibley, Frank. 2001. Approach to Aesthetics: Collected Papers on Philosophical Aesthetics. Edited by Benson, John, Redfern, Betty, and Cox, Jeremy Roxbeer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, Judith Jarvis. 2008. Normativity. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
Tuomela, Raimo. 2002. The Philosophy of Social Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valentini, Laura. 2012. “Assessing the Global Order: Justice, Legitimacy, or Political Justice?” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15 (5): 593–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. 1993. “Special Ties and Natural Duties.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 22 (1): 3–30.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1947. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. Translated by Henderson, A. M. and Parsons, Talcott. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar