Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-9b74x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-19T13:27:03.862Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Citizens in appropriate numbers: evaluating five claims about justice and population size

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Tim Meijers Open the ORCID record for Tim Meijers [Opens in a new window]
Tim Meijers*
Affiliation:
Institute for Philosophy, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands Hoover Chair of Economic and Social Ethics, University of Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
*
Email: Tim.meijers@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

While different worries about population size are present in public debates, political philosophers often take population size as given. This paper is an attempt to formulate a Rawlsian liberal egalitarian approach to population size: does it make sense to speak of ‘too few’ or ‘too many’ people from the point of view of justice? It argues that, drawing on key features of liberal egalitarian theory, several clear constraints on demographic developments – to the extent that they are under our control – can be formulated. Based on these claims, we can clarify both the grounds and content of our obligations to future generations.

Keywords

Demographic changeRawlsjust savings principleintergenerational justiceliberal egalitarianism

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 47 , Issue 2-3: Special issue: Ethics and Future Generations , 2017 , pp. 246 - 268
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Journal of Philosophy 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Arrhenius, Gustaf. Forthcoming. Population Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Attas, Daniel. 2009. “A Transgenerational Difference Principle.” In Intergenerational Justice, edited by Gosseries, Axel and Meyer, Lukas, 189–218. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, Brian. 1977. “Rawls on Average and Total Utility: A Comment.” Philosophical Studies 31 (5): 317–325. 10.1007/BF01873858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, Brian. 1992. “The Quest for Consistency: A Skeptical View.” In Free Movement, edited by Barry, Brian and Goodin, Robert, 279–287. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Barry, Brian. 1997. “Sustainability and Intergenerational Justice.” Theoria 45 (89): 43–65.Google Scholar
Barry, Brian. 2005. Why Social Justice Matters. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Broome, John. 2004. Weighing Lives. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/019924376X.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caney, Simon. 2013. “Just Emissions.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 40 (4): 255–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casal, Paula. 1997. “Environmentalism, Procreation and the Principle of Fairness.” Public Affairs Quarterly 4 (13): 363–376.Google Scholar
Casal, Paula. 2007. “Why Sufficiency Is Not Enough.” Ethics 117 (2): 296–326. 10.1086/510692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casal, Paula, and Williams, Andrew. 1995. “Rights, Equality and Procreation.” Analyse und Kritik 17: 93–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daily, Gretchen, and Ehrlich, Paul. 1992. “Population, Sustainability and Earth’s Carrying Capacity.” BioScience 42 (10): 761–771. 10.2307/1311995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniels, Norman. 1984. Am I my Parents’ Keeper? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, Partha. 1994. “Savings and Fertility: Ethical Issues.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 23 (2): 99–127. 10.1111/papa.1994.23.issue-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diamond, Jared. 2005. Collapse. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, Paul, and Holdren, J. P.. 1971. “Impact of Population Growth.” Science 171 (3977): 1212–1217. 10.1126/science.171.3977.1212CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gardiner, Stephen. 2011. “Rawls and Climate Change: Does Rawlsian Political Philosophy Pass the Global Test.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (2): 225–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaspart, Frédéric, and Gosseries, Axel. 2007. “Are Generational Savings Unjust?” Politics, Philosophy & Economics 6 (2): 193–217. 10.1177/1470594X07073006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gheaus, Anca. 2015. “Could There Ever be a Duty to Have Children?” In Permissible Progeny?, edited by Hannan, Sarah, Brennan, Samantha and Vernon, Richard, 87–106. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199378111.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goerres, Achim, and Vanhuysse, Pieter, eds. 2012. Ageing Population in Post-Industrial Democracies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gosseries, Axel. 2009. “Three Models of Intergenerational Reciprocity.” In Intergenerational Justice edited by Gosseries, Axel and Meyer, Lukas, 119–146. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gosseries, Axel. 2014. “Nations, Generations and Climate Justice.” Global Policy 5 (1): 96–102. 10.1111/gpol.2014.5.issue-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardin, Garrett. 1968. “The Tragedy of the Commons.” Science 162 (2859): 1243–1248.Google ScholarPubMed
Heyd, David. 1994. Genethics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Heyd, David. 2009. “A Value or an Obligation.” In Intergenerational Justice, edited by Axel Gosseries, and Lukas Meyer, , 167–188. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyward, Clare. 2012. “A Growing Problem Dealing with Population Increases in Climate Justice”. Ethical Perspectives 19 (4): 703–732.Google Scholar
Holtug, Nils. 2011. “The Cosmopolitan Strikes Back.” Ethics and Global Politics 4 (3): 147–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, Rahul. 2009. “Wronging Future People: A Contractualist Proposal.” In Intergenerational Justice, edited by Gosseries, Axel and Meyer, Lukas, 251–272. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippert-Rasmussen, Kasper. 2009. “Responsible Nations: Miller on National Responsibility.” Ethics and Global Politics 2 (2): 109–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, John. 2012. World Population Policies. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978-94-007-2837-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKerlie, Dennis. 2013. Justice Between the Old and the Young. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meijers, Tim. 2013. “Le bourgmestre et la limitation des naissances [The Mayor and Limits on Procreation].” Revue Nouvelle (4): 80–88.Google Scholar
Meijers, Tim. 2016a. “Climate Change and The Right to One Child.” In Human Rights and Sustainability, edited by Bos, Gerhard and Düwell, Marcus, 181–194. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meijers, Tim. 2016b. “Justice in Procreation.” PhD diss., University of Louvain.Google Scholar
Miller, David. 2005. “Immigration, the case for limits.” In Contemporary Debates in Applied Ethics, edited by Cohen, Andrew and Heath Wellman, Cristopher, 193–206. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Miller, David. 2007. National Responsibility and Global Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199235056.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, David. 2011. “National Responsibility and Global Justice.” In Nationalism and Global Justice: David Miller and his Critics, edited by De Schetter, Helder and Tinnevelt, Roland, 14–30. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Olsaretti, Serena. 2013. “Children as Public Goods?” Philosophy & Public Affairs 41 (3): 226–258. 10.1111/papa.2013.41.issue-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parfit, Derek. 1984. Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parijs, Philippe. 1998. “The Disfranchisement of the Elderly, and Other Attempts to Secure Intergenerational Justice.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 27 (4): 292–333. 10.1111/papa.1998.27.issue-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parijs, Philippe. 2003. “Difference Principle.” In The Cambridge Companion to Rawls, edited by Freeman, Samuel, 200–233. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rakowski, Eric. 1991. Equal Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York: Colombia University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1999. The Law of Peoples. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 2001. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 2005. Political Liberalism: Expanded Edition. New York: Colombia University Press.Google Scholar
Reiman, Jeffrey. 2007. “Being Fair to Future People: The Non-Identity Problem in the Original Position.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 35 (1): 69–92. 10.1111/papa.2007.35.issue-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roemer, John. 1996. Theories of Distributive Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roser, Domic, and Meyer, Lukas. 2009. “Enough For the Future.” In Intergenerational Justice, edited by Gosseries, Axel and Meyer, Lukas, 219–248. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya. 1999. Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tan, Kok-Chor. 2004. Justice Without Borders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511490385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UNFPA. 2012. World Fertility Report revised edition. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar