Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-h4f6x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-30T09:19:14.165Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Revision of the Genus Campichoeta Macquart (Diptera: Diastatidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

J. F. McAlpine
J. F. McAlpine
Affiliation:
Entomology Research Institute, Research Branch, Canada Department of Agriculture Ottawa, Ontario
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Examination of material of the genus Campichoeta Macq. (= Thryptocheta Rond.) from both the Old and the New Worlds, follawing clarification of the identities of most of the Palaearctic species by Basden and Collin (1958), revealed significant new information on the taxonomy of the genus. It showed that the common species in North America, heretofore called Thryptocheta micans Hendel (1911), is the same as Campichoeta griseola (Zett.) (1855) known from a single collection apparently made by Boheman in central Sweden about 1852. Also, it showed that an undescribed species occurs in southwestern United States.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 94 , Issue 1 , January 1962 , pp. 1 - 10
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Basden, E. B., and Collin, J. E.. 1958. On the examination of some Meigen and Zetterstedt specimens of Campichaeta Macquart (Diptera: Diastatidae). Proc. R. Ent. Soc. Lond. (B) 27: 133–144.Google Scholar
Duda, O. 1934. Diastatidae. Flieg. Pal. Reg. 6(1): 58e, pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
Frey, R. 1935. Die Dipterenfauna der Kanarischen Inseln und ihre Probleme. Soc. Sci. Fenn. Comment. Biol. 6(1): 1–237.Google Scholar
Hendel, F. 1911. Uber von Professor J. M. Aldrich erhaltene und einige andere amerikanische Dipteren. Wien. Ent. Zeit. 30: 19–46.Google Scholar
Hennig, W. 1958. Die Familien der Diptera Schizophora und ihre phylogenetischen Verwantschaftsbeziehungen. Beitr. z. Ent. 8: 505–688.Google Scholar
Loew, H. 1864. Uber die europaischen Arten der Gattung Diastata. Berl. ent. Zeitschr. 8: 357–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macquart, J. 1835. 14e. Sous-Tribu. Piophilides. Hist. Nat. Dipt. 2: 531–560.Google Scholar
Meigen, J. W. 1830. CCXI. Diastata. Syst. Beschr. 6: 94–100.Google Scholar
Melander, A. L. 1913. A synopsis of the dipterous groups Agromyzinae, Milichiinae, Ochthiphilinae and Geomyzinae. N.Y. Ent. Soc. Journ. 28: 283–300.Google Scholar
Rondani, C. 1856. Stirps XXIX. Drosophilina Rndn. Dipt. Ital. Prod. 1: 133–4.Google Scholar
Zetterstedt, W. 1855. Addenda Tomis VI, VIII and XI. 181. Geomyza. Dipt. Scand. 12: 4798–4800.Google Scholar
Zetterstedt, W. 1860. Fam. 34. Geomyzides Fall. Dipt. Scand. 14: 6422–6424.Google Scholar