Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-mnl9s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-30T17:21:01.020Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relation of Body Weight to Fecundity in Queen Honeybees

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

R. Boch  and
C. A. Jamieson
R. Boch
Affiliation:
Research Branch, Canada Department of Agriculture, Ottawa, Canada
C. A. Jamieson
Affiliation:
Research Branch, Canada Department of Agriculture, Ottawa, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In a recent communication, Hoopingarner and Farrar (1959) report that the weight of the queen honeybee is genetically controlled, and that a proportional relationship exists between body weight and the number of ovarian tubules. These statements corroborate the findings by Eckert (1934) who found that the number of ovarioles tends to be influenced by hereditary factors. In a subsequent study Eckert (1937) was unable to correlate number of ovarioles with actual brood production. Whether a queen with a greater body weight is capable of laying more eggs than a small and lightweight queen remained to be determined; hence the present study was undertaken.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 92 , Issue 9 , September 1960 , pp. 700 - 701
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Eckert, J. E. 1934. Studies in the number of ovarioles in queen honeybees in relation to body size. J. Econ. Ent. 27: 629–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, J. E. 1937. Relation of size to fecundity ih queen honeybees, J. Econ. Ent. 30: 646–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoopingarner, R., and Farrar, C. L.. 1959. Genetic control of size in queen honeybees J. Econ. Ent. 52: 547–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar