Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-w5vf4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-23T12:36:35.640Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE OLDEST ANTS ARE CRETACEOUS, NOT EOCENE: COMMENT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

David Grimaldi  and
Donat Agosti
David Grimaldi*
Affiliation:
Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, New York, United States 10024-5192
Donat Agosti
Affiliation:
Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, New York, United States 10024-5192
*
1 Author to whom all corresponding should be addressed (E-mail: grimaldi@amnh.org).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The recent paper by Poinar et al. (1999), entitled “New amber deposit provides evidence of early paleogene extinctions, paleoclimates, and past distributions,” reports a new deposit of fossiliferous amber from the Eocene of British Columbia. This report of a significant discovery by one of the co-authors (Bruce Archibald) is compromised by unexplained statements that ants in this amber are the “earliest unequivocal ants.” They cited unpublished cladograms by Cesare Baroni Urbani as the source of information that showed that previous reports of ants in Cretaceous amber were not really ants.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 132 , Issue 5 , October 2000 , pp. 691 - 693
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bolton, B. 1994. Identification Guide to the Ant Genera of the World. Cambridge: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Brothers, D.J. 1999. Phylogeny and evolution of wasps, ants and bees (Hymenotpera, Chrysidoidea, Vespoidea and Apoidea). Zoologica Scripta 28: 23349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, J.M., Rasnitsyn, A.P. 1990. Mesozoic Vespidae. Psyche (Cambridge) 97: 120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darling, D.C., Sharkey, M. 1990. Hymenoptera. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 195: 12353Google Scholar
Dlussky, G. 1983. A new family of Upper Cretaceous Hymenopteraan intermediate link between the ants and the scolioids. Palaeontological Journal 3: 6578Google Scholar
Dlussky, G. 1999. New ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) from Canadian amber. Palaeontological Journal 33: 40912Google Scholar
Grimaldi, D., Agosti, D., Carpenter, J.M. 1997. New and rediscovered primitive ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Cretaceous amber from New Jersey, and their phylogenetic relationships. American Museum Novitates 3208Google Scholar
Hlldobler, B., Wilson, E.O. 1990. The Ants. Cambridge: Harvard University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poinar, G.Q. Jr. 1992. Life in Amber. Palo Alto: Stanford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poinar, G.Q. Jr., Archibald, B., Brown, A. 1999. New amber deposit provides evidence of early Paleogene extinctions, paleoclimates, and past distributions. The Canadian Entomologist 131: 1717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, E.O. 1972. The Insect Societies. Cambridge: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Wilson, E.O. 1985. Ants from the Cretaceous and Eocene amber of North America. Psyche 92: 20516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, E.O., Carpenter, F.M., Brown, W.L. Jr., 1967. The first Mesozoic ants, with the description of a new subfamily. Psyche 74: 119Google Scholar