Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-plnhv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-08-19T19:26:26.802Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Les Formicides (Hyménoptères) de Provancher

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

A. Francoeur  and
R. Béique
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

All the Provancher species of Formicidae have been synonymized. However examination of the types shows that three species were new at the time. But one of them was a primary homonym. A new synonymy and a new combination are proposed.

Résumé

Toutes les espèces de Fourmis que Provancher a décrites sont tombées en synonymie. Cependant l'examen des types démontre que trois espèces s’avéraient nouvelles à l'époque. L’une d’entre elles fut désignée par un homonyme primaire. Nous proposons pour les deux autres une synonymie et une combinaison nouvelles.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 98 , Issue 2 , February 1966 , pp. 140 - 145
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Références

André, Ed. 1881. Species des Hyménoptères d'Europe, vol. 2, Beaune, pp. 1–404.Google Scholar
André, Er. 1887. Rev. d'Ent., p. 288 (Cité par Wilson).Google Scholar
Brown, W. L. Jr., 1949. A new American Amblyopone, with notes on the genus. Psyche 56: 81–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, W. L. Jr., 1955. The ant Leptothorax muscorum (Nyl.) in North America. Ent. News 66: 43–50.Google Scholar
Burks, B. D. 1963. The Provancher species of Chalcidoidea (Hymenoptera). Canad. Ent. 95: 1254–1263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creighton, W. S. 1950. The ants of North America. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 104: 1–585.Google Scholar
Cresson, E. T. 1887. Catalog of described Hymenoptera of America North of Mexico. Trans. ent. Soc. Amer., Supp. Vol., Philadelphia, 350 pp.Google Scholar
Dalla Torre, C. G. 1898. Catalogus Hymenopterorum, vol. 7, Leipsig, Engelmann, 289 pp.Google Scholar
Francoeur, A. 1965. Ecologie des populations de Fourmis dans un bois de chênes rouges et d'érables rouges. Nat. Can. (Sous presse.)Google Scholar
Gahan, A. B., et Rohwer, S. A.. 1917–1918. Lectotypes of the species of Hymenoptera (except Apoides) described by Abbé Provancher. Canad. Ent. 49: 298–308, 396, 427; 50: 103, 197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muesebeck, C. F., Krombine, K. V. and Townes, H. K.. 1951. Hym. of America North of Mexico Synoptic Catalog, U.S. Dep. Agric., Monogr. 2, Washington, D.C., pp. 778–875.Google Scholar
Pergande, T. 1900. Proc. Wash. Acad. Sci. 2: 519–520.Google Scholar
Provancher, L. 1881. Faune canadienne, Hyménoptères, Formicides. Nat. Can. 12: 206, 354–360.Google Scholar
Provancher, L. 1883. Petite faune entomologique du Canada. Vol. II, C. Darveau, 831 pp.Google Scholar
Provancher, L. 1885–1889. Additions et Corrections au volume II de la Faune entomologique du Canada. Québec, C. Darveau, 477 pp.Google Scholar
Vickery, V. R., et Kevan, D. K. McE.. 1964. The Provancher types of Orthoptera. Canad. Ent. 96: 1549–1554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, W. M. 1906. New ants from New England. Psyche 13: 38–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, E. O. 1955. Revision of the ant genus Lasius. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 113 (1): 1–199.Google Scholar