Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-9knnw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-29T07:45:45.742Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

IMPORTED CARABID BEETLE MAY BE A POTENTIAL PEST

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

F. O. Morrison
F. O. Morrison
Affiliation:
Macdonald College, Quebec
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Early this year a complaint was received from Mr. George A. Cameron of Inverness, Nova Scotia, that black beetles were numerous in the basement of his home. They were crawling into stored milk and meat, as well as into flour bins; in fact, they showed a great liking for places difficult of access. On occasions they appeared in other rooms of the house, even dropping down into the shades of lighting fixtures. Similar trouble had been experienced the previous year. No actual damage was reported aside from waste when the presence of beetles necessitated the discarding of food stuffs.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 73 , Issue 12 , December 1941 , pp. 217 - 218
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1941

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

LITERATURE CITED

1. 1900. Webster, F. M.Harpalus caliginosus as a strawberry pest, with notes on other phytophagous Carabidae. Can. Ent. 32:265–271.Google Scholar
2. 1923. Ext. (—). Erdbeerschädling. Nachrichtenbl. deutsch. Pflanzenschutzdienst, iii No. 1, p. 6. (Rev. Appl. Ent. 11:159).Google Scholar
3. 1924. van Poeteren, N.Report on the work of the Phytopathological service in the year 1922. Verslag, en Meded. Plantenziektenk Dienst. 31. (Rev. Appl. Ent. 12:183).Google Scholar
4. 1927. Report on advisory work 1925–1926, economic entomology, Ann. Rept. Agric. & Hortic. Res. Sta. Long Ashton Bristol 1926:125–134. (Rev. Appi. Ent. 15:615).Google Scholar
5. 1931. Walton, C. L. & Kearns, H. G.. Carabid beetles as strawberry pests in Chedar district. J. Minist. Agric. 38 (4):373–379. (Rev. Appl. Ent. 19:539).Google Scholar
6. 1932. van Poeteren, N.Report on the work of the Phytopathological service in 1931. Verst. Plantzenzktenk. Dienst. 66. (Rev. Appl. Ent. 20:566).Google Scholar
7. 1933. Zolk K. Der Erdbeerenlaufkäfer (Harpalus pubescens Mùll.) und seine Bekämpfung Mitt. Versuchssta angnew Ent. Univ. Tartu. 22. (Rev. Appl. Ent. 21:311).Google Scholar
8. 1934. Beriek der Lehr— und Forschunpanstalt fur Wein— Obstund Gartenbau zu Geisenheim Rhein 1931–1932. Landw. Jb. Preuss. 77. (Rev. Appl. Ent. 22:340).Google Scholar
9. 1936. Lazarov, A. V.Notes on some unknown insect pests of strawberry in Bulgaria. (In Bulgarian) Sta. Rech. Anim. Fac. agron. for. 52. (Rev. Appl. Ent. 25:280).Google Scholar
10. 1937. Vappula, N. A.The occurrence of pests in Finland m 1193–1935. Valt. Maatalousk. Tied. 126 (Rev. Appl. Ent. 26:201).Google Scholar
11. 1938. Botley fruit station report on experiments on strawberries 1923–1937. Winchester Hants Agric. Educ. Comm. (Rev. Appl. Ent. 26:384).Google Scholar
12. 1938. Whitney, R. J.A plague of the beetle Harpalus rufipes De Geer. Ent. Mon. Mag. 74 (892): 200–201. (Rev. Appl. Ent. 26:763).Google Scholar
13. 1938. Plant, diseases and pests in Denmark 1937. Tidsskr. Planteaul 43:222–278. (Rev Appl. Ent. 27:117).Google Scholar
14. 1939. Kirchner, H. A.Laufkäferschäden an Erdbeeren. Z. Pflkrankh. 49(4): 267–271. (Rev. Appl. Ent. 27:457).Google Scholar
15. 1939. Muhle, E.Ein Laufkäfer als Erdbeerschadling. Kranke Pflanze 16 pt. 4:67–69 (Rev. Appl. Ent. 27:466).Google Scholar
16. 1940. Brown, W. J.Notes on the American distribution of some species of Coleoptera common to the European and Noith American continents. Can. Ent. 72(4):65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar