Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-fg9bn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-23T11:46:04.267Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

EXPERIMENTS WITH ARTIFICIAL LIGHT: NECESSITY FOR PROPERLY IDENTIFYING THE SOURCE1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Bernard J. R. Philogène
Bernard J. R. Philogène
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, OntarioK1N 6N5
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The use of artificial illumination in entomological studies is extensive. Incandescent and fluorescent lights are used in mass-rearing insects necessary for physiological and ecological studies, and in photoperiod-controlled as well as in electrophysiological experiments.

One of the main problems facing investigators in the interpretation of their results or in comparing these to preceding reports is the plethora of ways in which experimental conditions involving light are reported. Here are some examples: “The ants were kept under fluorescent light from 0800 to 2000 hours; light intensity on the ants was about 400 lux” (McCluskey 1965).

Information

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 114 , Issue 4 , April 1982 , pp. 377 - 379
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Beck, S. D. 1980. Insect Photoperiodism, 2nd ed. Academic Press, N.Y.387 pp.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, W. E. 1972. Photoperiodic control in the initiation of diapause by Chaoborus americanus (Diptera: Culicidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 65: 755–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradshaw, W. E. 1974. Photoperiodic control of development in Chaoborus americanus with special reference to photoperiodic action spectra. Biol. Bull. 146: 11–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butterfield, J. 1976. Effect of photoperiod on a winter and on a summer diapause in the two species of cranefly (Tipulidae). J. Insect Physiol. 22: 1443–1446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clay, M. E. and Venard, C. E.. 1972. Larval diapause in the mosquito Aedes triseriatus: effects of diet and temperature on photoperiod induction. J. Insect Physiol. 18: 1441–1446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, D. A. 1966. The role of responses to light in the selection and maintenance of microhabitat by the nymphs of two species of mayfly. Anim. Behav. 14: 17–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaiser, W., Seidl, R., and Vollmar, J.. 1977. The participation of all three colour receptors in the phototactic behaviour of fixed walking honeybees. J. Comp. Physiol. 122: 27–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCluskey, E. S. 1965. Circadian rhythms in male ants of five diverse species. Science 150: 1037–1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rupert, C. S. 1978. Uniform terminology for radiations. Photochem. Photobiol. 28: 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rupert, C. S. and Latarjet, R.. 1978. Toward a nomenclature and domestic scheme applicable to all radiations. Photochem. Photobiol. 28: 3–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, K. C. 1977. New topics in photobiology. pp. 371–395in Smith, K. C. (Ed.), The Science of Photobiology. Renum Press, N.Y.Google Scholar
Stross, R. G. 1966. Light and temperature requirements for diapause development and release in Daphnia. Ecology 47: 368–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thoms, D. A. and Philogène, B. J. R.. 1979. Quality of light-effects on immature stages and adults of Pieris rapae (L.) (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). Rev. Can. Biol. 38: 157–165.Google ScholarPubMed
Thorington, L. 1973. Light, biology and people, Part I. Lighting, Design and Applications 3(11): 19–43.Google Scholar
Watson, T. F., Lindsey, M. L., and Slosser, J. E.. 1973. Effect of temperature, moisture and photoperiod on termination of diapause in the pink bollworm. Environ. Ent. 2: 967–970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar