Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-65tv2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-28T01:39:37.398Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

EFFECTS OF DATE OF SOIL DISTURBANCE ON NUMBERS OF ADULT FIELD CRICKETS (ORTHOPTERA: GRYLLIDAE), IN FLORIDA1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Carol A. Rolph Kay ,
Joyce Naffziger Veazey  and
W. H. Whitcomb
Carol A. Rolph Kay
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of Florida, Gainesville
Joyce Naffziger Veazey
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of Florida, Gainesville
W. H. Whitcomb
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of Florida, Gainesville
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Adults of Gryllus rubens Scudder, G. firmus Scudder, and G. ovisopis Walker were collected for 4 years from plots disked annually on one of six dates and from undisturbed plots to examine effects of date of soil disturbance on field cricket populations. Adults of the two field-inhabiting species, G. rubens and G. firmus, were most numerous from plots disked in February or April and least numerous from the plots disked in October and from the undisturbed (control) plots. Adults of G. ovisopis, a species that normally inhabits forests, were most numerous from the undisturbed plots and least numerous from the plots disked in August.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 109 , Issue 5 , May 1977 , pp. 721 - 726
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Alexander, R. D. 1961. Aggressiveness, territoriality, and sexual behavior in field crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Behavior 17: 130–223.Google Scholar
Alexander, R. D. 1968. Life cycle origins, speciation, and related phenomena in crickets. Q. Rev. Biol. 43: 1–41.Google Scholar
Briggs, J. B. 1961. A comparison of pitfall trapping and soil sampling in assessing populations of two species of ground beetles (Col.: Carabidae). Rep. E. Mall. Res. Stn 1960: 180–112.Google Scholar
Fulton, B. B. 1952. Speciation in the field cricket. Evolution 6: 283–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gangwere, S. K. 1961. A monograph on food selection in Orthoptera. Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 87: 67–230.Google Scholar
Greenslade, P. J. M. 1964. Pitfall trapping as a method for studying populations of Carabidae (Coleoptera). J. Anim. Ecol. 33: 301–310.Google Scholar
Harris, D. L. and Whitcomb, W. H.. 1971. Habitat relationship and seasonal abundance of four species of Evarthrus (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Coleopts Bull. 25: 67–72.Google Scholar
Hemenway, R., and Whitcomb, W. H.. 1967. Ground beetles of the genus Lebia Latreille in Arkansas (Coleoptera: Carabidae): Ecology and geographical distribution. Proc. Ark. Acad. Sci. 2: 15–20.Google Scholar
Menke, W. W. 1973. Response surface methodology applications to biological data from field measurements. Ecology 54: 920–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metcalf, C. L., Flint, W. P., and Metcalf, R. L.. 1962. Destructive and useful insects. McGraw-Hill, New York. 1087 pp.Google Scholar
Mitchell, B. 1963. Ecology of two carabid beetles, Bembidion lampros (Herbst) and Trechus quadristriatus (Schrawk) II. Studies on populations of adults in the field, with special reference to the technique of pitfall trappings. J. Anim. Ecol. 32: 377–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickerson, J. C. E. 1972. A bionomic study of Iridomyrmex pruinosus (Roger) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) with notes on associated ants. M.S. Thesis, Univ. Arkansas, Fayetteville. x + 87 pp.Google Scholar
Nickle, D. A. and Walker, T. J.. 1974. A morphological key to field crickets of southeastern United States (Orthoptera: Gryllidae: Gryllus). Fla Ent. 57: 8–12.Google Scholar
Sheals, J. G. 1957. Soil population studies. I. The effects of cultivation and treatment with insecticides. Bull. ent. Res. 54: 803–822.Google Scholar
Steel, R. G. D. and Torrie, J. H.. 1960. Principles and procedures of statistics. McGraw-Hill, New York. 481 pp.Google Scholar
Veazey, J. N., Kay, C. A. R., Walker, T. J., and Whitcomb, W. H.. 1976. Seasonal abundance, sex ratio, and macroptery of field crickets in northern Florida. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 69: 374–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, T. J. 1974. Gryllus ovisopis n. sp: A taciturn cricket with a life cycle suggesting allochronic speciation. Fla Ent. 57: 13–22.Google Scholar
Whitcomb, W. H. 1974. Natural populations of entomophagous arthropods and their effects on the agroecosystem, pp. 150–169. In Maxwell, F. G. and Harris, F.A. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Summer Institute of Biological Control of Plant Insects and Diseases. Univ. Press of Miss. 647 pp.Google Scholar