Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-9knnw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-01T16:19:22.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE ECONOMICS OF ENTOMOLOGICAL EFFORT: VIEWPOINT OF THE PESTICIDE INDUSTRY IN CANADA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

G.B. Kinoshita
G.B. Kinoshita
Affiliation:
Agricultural Products, Cyanamid Canada Inc., 2255 Sheppard Ave. E., Willowdale, Ontario, Canada M2J 4Y5
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The economics of entomological effort is discussed from the viewpoint of the pesticide industry in Canada. Industry is concerned primarily with obtaining an acceptable return on investment. To illustrate the investment trend in insecticide development in Canada, the cost of research and development (R&D) from discovery to registration is examined. Statistics on retail sales of pest-control products, on new compounds being tested, and on the number of new registrations indicate declining interest in insecticide development in Canada. The present and future role of the Canadian pesticide industry in insecticide development is discussed.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 117 , Issue 7 , July 1985 , pp. 909 - 921
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

ABC Assistance to Business in Canada. 1979. Ministry of State for Economic Development.Google Scholar
Alberta Agriculture. 1979. Warble control does not cost — it pays. Alberta Agriculture Communications. October 22.Google Scholar
Austin, C. 1979. The puzzling outlook for world pesticides. Farm Chem. September: 14–22.Google Scholar
Barrons, K.C. 1971. Environmental benefits of intensive crop protection. Agric. Sci. Rev. 9(2): 33–39.Google Scholar
Bradbury, F., and Russell, J. 1980. Technology change and its manpower implications. Chem. Ind. News. April.Google Scholar
Braunholtz, J.T. 1977. Proc. 15th Int. Congr. Ent. 747 pp.Google Scholar
Braunholtz, J.T. 1979. Techno-economic considerations. Chem. Ind. News. November.Google Scholar
Brinkman, G.L. and Prentice, B.E. 1981. Agricultural research — 40 to 1 return on investment. Highl. Agric. Res. Ont. 4(2): 5–8.Google Scholar
Cabinet Committee on Economic Development. 1976. Province of New Brunswick. 1976. Report of the Task Force for Evaluation of Budworm Control Alternatives. New Brunswick Government. 210 pp.Google Scholar
CACA. 1981. Sales statistics for pesticides in Canada.Google Scholar
Carlson, G.A., and Castle, E.M.. 1972. Economics of pest control. In Pest control strategies for the future. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Cashman, C.M., Martin, M.A., and McCarl, B.A.. 1980. Economic consequences of restrictions on herbicides currently used on Indiana farms. AAEA Meetings, University of Illinois, Champaign–Urbana, IL.Google Scholar
Chapman, T. 1979. Planning for change in an agrochemical business. Chem. Ind. News. November.Google Scholar
Cooper, G. 1981. National Research Council. Industrial Research Assistance Program. Personal communication.Google Scholar
Cooper, G.S. 1963. Reference paper describing the procedure followed by Cyanamid of Canada Limited in preparing a petition for registration for specific uses of a pesticide. Submitted to the Special Committee on Food and Drugs by Cyanamid of Canada.Google Scholar
Corbett, J.R. 1979. Technical considerations affecting the discovery of new pesticides. Chem. Ind. News. November.Google Scholar
Cordell, A.J. 1971. The multinational firm, foreign direct investment, and Canadian science policy. Background study for the Science Council of Canada. Special Study No. 22, Science Council of Canada. 91 pp.Google Scholar
Costen, R.A. 1974. Industrial research and development of pesticides in Canada. Proceedings of the Twenty-first Annual Meeting, Agricultural Pesticide Society, Québec City.Google Scholar
Costen, R.A. 1977. Entomological information required by regulatory bodies. Presentation to the Entomological Society of Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba, 22 August, 1977.Google Scholar
Council for Agricultural Science and Technology. 1981. Impact of government regulation on the development of chemical pesticides for agriculture and forestry. CAST Report No. 87.Google Scholar
Daviault, R. 1978. Selected agricultural statistics for Canada. Agriculture Canada Publication No. 78/10.Google Scholar
Eichers, T.R., and Adrilenas, P.A.. 1979. Evaluation of pesticide supplies and demand for 1979. U.S. Department of Agriculture Economics, Statistics, and Co-operatives Service. Agricultural Economic Report No. 422.Google Scholar
Fallwell, W.F. 1981. R&D support continues strong in 1981. Chem. Ind. News. January.Google Scholar
Gilbert, C.H. 1978. Farm Chem. April: 20.Google Scholar
Headley, J.C. 1968. Estimating the productivity of agricultural pesticides. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 50: 13–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Headley, J.C. 1979. Economics of pest control: have priorities changed? Farm Chem. April: 55–57.Google Scholar
Hollis, W.L. 1981. Federal regulations—agriculture's Gordian knot. Weeds Today 12(2): 27–28.Google Scholar
Hudak, J., and Raske, A.G.. 1980. Canadian Forestry Service submission to the Newfoundland and Labrador Royal Commission on Forest Protection and Management. Environment Canada Forestry Service, Newfoundland Forest Research Centre. 261 pp.Google Scholar
Lamontagne, M. 1970. A science policy for Canada. Vol. 1: A critical review: past and present.Google Scholar
Lamontagne, M. 1972. A science policy for Canada. Vol. 2: Targets and strategies for the seventies. 608 pp.Google Scholar
Martin, M.A., Cashman, C.M., and McCarl, B.A.. 1980. Economic impacts of restrictions on selected soybean insecticides: an analysis of a typical Indiana farm. AAEA Meetings, University of Illinois, Champaign–Urbana, IL.Google Scholar
McEwen, F.L. 1978. Food production—the challenge for pesticides. Bioscience 2(12): 773–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menn, J. 1980. Contemporary frontiers in chemical pesticide research. J. Agric. Food Chem. 28: 2–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Migicovsky, B. 1977. Orientation of Canadian agriculture: A review of the Canadian agriculture and food complex. Vol. I, Part A, The system. Vol. I, Part B, The commodities. Vol. III, Economic and social factors related to agriculture and food. Vol. IV, Summary and conclusions. Agriculture Canada.Google Scholar
Morimoto, S. 1979. The puzzling outlook for world pesticides. Farm Chem. September: 14–22.Google Scholar
NACA. 1979. NACA industry profile study for years 1978–1979. Ernst and Whinney, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Nagy, J.G., and Furtan, W.H.. 1978. Economic costs and returns from crop development research: The case of rapeseed breeding in Canada. Can. J. Agric. Econ. 26(1): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Academy of Sciences. 1975 a. Pest control: An assessment of present and alternative technologies. Vol. I, Contemporary pest control practices and prospects. NAS, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
National Academy of Sciences. 1975 b. Pest control: An assessment of present and alternative technologies. Vol. II, Corn/soybeans pest control. NAS, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Pimentel, D. 1976. World food crisis: Energy and pests. Bull. ent. Soc. Am. 22: 20–26.Google Scholar
Pimentel, D., Krummel, J., Gallahan, D., Hough, J., Merrill, A., Schreiner, I., Vittum, P., Kozoil, F., Back, E., Yen, D., and Fiance, S.. 1978. Benefits and costs of pesticide use in U.S. food production. BioScience 28(12): 772, 777–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pimentel, D., Terhune, E.C., Dritschilo, W., Gallahan, D., Kinner, N., Nafus, D., Peterson, R., Zarch, N., Misiti, J., and Haber-Schaim, O.. 1977. Pesticides, insects in foods, and cosmetic standards. BioScience 27(3): 178–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rausser, G.C., DeJanvry, A., Schmitz, A., and Zilberman, D.. 1980. Principal issues in the evaluation of public research in agriculture. Working Paper #86, Division of Agricultural Science, University of California.Google Scholar
Rogers, J.P. 1976. Proposed incentives: Industry's viewpoint in developing incentives for pest control methods. Arthur D. Little Inc., Cambridge, MA. 76 pp.Google Scholar
Ruttan, V.W. 1978. Bureaucratic productivity: The case of agricultural research. Staff Paper Series P78–16, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN.Google Scholar
The Make or Buy Policy. 1973–1975. Ministry of State for Science and Technology.Google Scholar
Topical Law Reports. 1981. Commerce Clearing House Inc. Canadian Ltd., Don Mills, Ont.Google Scholar
Teresko, J. 1978. Will America feed the world? Part 10. Indust. Week. 18 September. 73–82.Google Scholar
USDA. 1975. Agricultural statistics 1975. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Verespej, M.A. 1979. Future focus, Part 15. Indust. Week. 16 April: 69–30.Google Scholar
von Rumker, R., Kelso, G.L., Horay, F., and Lawrence, K.A.. 1975. A study of the use of pesticides in agriculture. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.Google Scholar