Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-plnhv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-08-29T12:31:35.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

CONTACT TOXICITY OF 17 INSECTICIDES TO LARVAE OF DIORYCTRIA AMATELLA (LEPIDOPTERA: PYRALIDAE)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Gary L. DeBarr  and
Vicki H. Fedde
Gary L. DeBarr
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, Athens, Georgia 30602
Vicki H. Fedde
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, Athens, Georgia 30602
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Moths of the genus Dioryctria are important insect pests of North American conifers (Baker 1972). Of the species that occur in the southern United States, e.g., D. clarioralis (Walker), D. disclusa (Heinrich), and D. ebeli Mutuura and Munroe, the southern pine coneworm, Dioryctria amatella (Hulst), is the most destructive (Ebel et al. 1975). Our paper reports the results of laboratory tests aimed at determining the relative toxicities of commercially available or promising experimental insecticides to D. amatella larvae.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 112 , Issue 5 , 01 May 1980 , pp. 521 - 523
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Baker, W. L. 1972. Eastern forest insects. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv. Misc. Publ. 1175.Google Scholar
Daum, R. J. 1970. A revision of two computer programs for probit analysis. Bull. ent. Soc. Am. 16: 10–15.Google Scholar
DeBarr, G. L. et al. 1972. Phorate tests for slash pine cone insect control with observations on clonal variation in insect infestation. For. Sci. 18: 56–64.Google Scholar
Ebel, B. H. et al. 1975. Seed and cone insects of southern pines. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. SE-8. Southeast. For. Exp. Stn., Asheville, N. C., and Southeast. Area, State & Priv. For., Atlanta, Ga.Google Scholar
Fatzinger, C. W. 1970. The number of instars of Dioryctria amatella (Hulst) in north Florida. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv. Res. Note SE-142. Southeast. For. Exp. Stn., Asheville, N. C.Google Scholar
Fedde, V. H. 1974. Rearing the elm spanworm on artificial diet: a preliminary report. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv. Res. Note SE-204. Southeast. For. Exp. Stn., Asheville, N. C.Google Scholar
Merkel, E. P. 1964. Hydraulic spray applications of insecticides for the control of slash pine cone and seed insects. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv. Res. Pap. SE-9. Southeast. For. Exp. Stn., Asheville, N. C.Google Scholar
Merkel, E. P. 1970. Trunk-implanted insecticides for slash pine insect control. Fla Ent. 53: 143–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merkel, E. P. and DeBarr, G. L.. 1971. Trunk implantations of dicrotophos for cone insect control in slash pine seed production stands. J. econ. Ent. 64: 1295–1298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merkel, E. P., DeBarr, G. L., and O'Gwynn, C. H.. 1976. Mist blower application of Guthion® for cone insect control in slash pine seed orchards. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv. Res. Pap. SE-148. Southeast. For. Exp. Stn., Asheville, N. C.Google Scholar