Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-qc88w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-26T07:11:00.779Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

POPULATION STUDIES OF THE GARDEN SYMPHYLAN, SCUTIGERELLA IMMACULATA (SYMPHYLA: SCUTIGERELLIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

J. Stallard Waterhouse
J. Stallard Waterhouse
Affiliation:
Biology Department, State University College of Arts and Science, Plattsburgh, New York
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The garden symphylan (Scutigerella immaculata Newport) population of a field of table beets, Beta vulgaris L., in northwestern Oregon, was studied. The number of symphylans from the samples ranged from 110 to 1131 per cubic foot with an average of 557. Several laboratory tests were conducted to study garden symphylan population increases in soil types treated differently. It was found that garden symphylans reproduce well in soil types such as Felida, Salkum, and Melbourne. Manure added to these soils increases their porosity, probably supplies additional foodstuff, and consequently provides the best rearing medium.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 99 , Issue 7 , July 1967 , pp. 696 - 702
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Edwards, E. E. 1929. A survey of the insect and other invertebrate fauna of permanent pasture and arable land of certain soil types at Aberystwyth. Ann. appl. Biol. 16: 299–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, C. A. T. 1957. Bionomics of the Symphyla. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Edwards, C. A. T. 1958. The ecology of Symphyla. I: Populations. Exp. and Appl. Ent. 1: 308–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Fowler, R. H., and Ness, A. B.. 1954. Soil survey of Lewis County, Washington. U.S. Dep. Agric., Soil Cons. Serv. in cooperation with Wash. Exp. Sta. and State Dep. Cons. and Dev. pp. 34–36.Google Scholar
*McGee, D. A. et al. , 1964. Soil survey of Clark County, Washington. (Unpubl.) U.S. Dep. Agric. Soil Cons. Service.Google Scholar
Michelbacher, A. E. 1938. The biology of the garden centipede, Scutigerella immaculata. Hilgardia 11: 1–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, H. M. 1922. On a method of separating insects and other arthropods from soil. Bull. ent. Res. 13: 197–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, H. M. 1927. The insect and other invertebrate fauna of arable land at Rothamsted. Ann. appl. Biol. Pt. II, 14: 442–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Ness, A. O. et al. 1958. Soil survey of Thurston County, Washington, U.S. Dep. Agric., Soil Cons. Serv. in cooperation with Wash. Agric. Exp. Sta. pp. 41–42, 46–47, 49, 52, 59.Google Scholar
*Poulson, E. N. et al. 1952. Soil survey of King County, Washington. U.S. Dep. Agric. Bur. Plant Ind., Soils, and Agric. Eng. cooperating with Wash. Exp. Sta. and Wash. State Planning Council. pp. 33–35.Google Scholar
Savos, M. E. 1958. The bionomics of the garden symphylid. Ph.D. Thesis, Oregon State University, Corvallis.Google Scholar
Waterhouse, J. S. 1957. Field and laboratory evaluations of soil insecticides on the garden symphylan, Scutigerella immaculata Newport. M.S. Thesis, Washington State University, Pullman.Google Scholar
Waterhouse, J. S. 1959. A laboratory method for evaluating toxicity of insecticides on the garden symphylan, Scutigerella immaculata. J. econ. Ent. 52(5): 892–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waterhouse, J. S. 1962. Biology of the garden symphylan, Scutigerella immaculata Newport. Ph.D. Thesis, Washington State University, Pullman.Google Scholar