Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-p5m67 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-26T16:07:21.343Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Bioassay of Insect Feeding Tokens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

P. Harris  and
A. I. Mohyuddin
P. Harris
Affiliation:
Research Institute, Research Branch, Canada Department of Agriculture, Belleville, Ontario
A. I. Mohyuddin
Affiliation:
Research Institute, Research Branch, Canada Department of Agriculture, Belleville, Ontario
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The acceptability of host plant extracts on pith, charred filter paper, and an agar diet, and vacuum infiltrated into lettuce leaves was compared on three species of Lepidoptera and two of Coleoptera. The vacuum infiltrated lettuce was eaten by two of the Lepidoptera and it was the only method acceptable to the Coleoptera. The agar diet was eaten by the three Lepidoptera while pith and charred filter paper were acceptable to only two of them. It is concluded that vacuum infiltration of lettuce leaves is a useful method for the bioassay of host plant extracts to determine if they contain insect feeding token substances.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 97 , Issue 8 , August 1965 , pp. 830 - 833
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Harris, P. 1963. Host specificity of Calophasia lunula (Hufn.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Canad. Ent. 95: 101–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jermy, T. 1964. The role of rejective stimuli in the host selection of phytophagous insects. Paper read at 12th International Congress of Entomology, London.Google Scholar
Krotkov, G. 1947. Vacuum infiltration as a method for determining enzymic activity in vivo. Science 105: 318–320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuhn, R., and Löw, I.. 1955. Resistance factors against Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say isolated from the leaves of wild Solanum species, pp. 122–132. In Resistance to toxic agents. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Nayar, J. K., and Fraenkel, G.. 1963. The chemical basis of the host selection in the catalpa sphinx, Ceratomia catalpae, Lepidoptera, Sphingidae. Ann. ent. Soc. Amer. 56: 119–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niimura, M., and Ito, T.. 1964. Feeding on filter paper by larvae of the silkworm, Bombyx mori L. J. Ins. Physiol. 10: 425–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorsteinson, A. J., and Nayar, J. K.. 1963. Plant phospholipids as feeding stimulants for grasshoppers. Canad. J. Zool. 41: 931–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanderzant, E. S., Richardson, C. D. and Fort, S. W.. 1962. Rearing of the bollworm on artificial diet. J. econ. Ent. 55: 140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamamoto, R. T., and Fraenkel, G.. 1960. Assay of the principle gustatory stimulant for the tobacco hornworm, Protoparce sexta (Johan.) from Solanaceous plants. Ann. ent. Soc. Amer. 53: 499–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar