Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-mx8w7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-29T09:26:12.059Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

FLORUS AND DIO ON THE ENSLAVEMENT OF THE PROVINCES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2013

Myles Lavan
Myles Lavan*
Affiliation:
University of St Andrews, UK
*
*Email: mpl2@st-andrews.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper draws attention to the unprecedented prominence of metaphors ofenslavement to Rome in the historical narratives of Florus and Cassius Dio.Following an analysis of the thematic importance of the trope in theirrespective works, I point to further parallels in Herodian and Justin whichsuggest that the trope proved particularly productive in both Latin and Greekhistoriography in the late second and early third centuries CE. The end of thepaper considers broader cultural developments that might underlie thisphenomenon, notably the proliferation of dominus as an epithetfor the emperor and the ongoing enfranchisement of provincials.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Cambridge Classical Journal , Volume 59 , December 2013 , pp. 125 - 151
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2013. Published by Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Works cited

Aalders, G. J. D. (1986) ‘Cassius Dio and the Greek world’, Mnemosyne 39, 291–302.Google Scholar
Alföldi, A. (1970) Die monärchische Repräsentation im römischen Kaiserreiche, Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Alföldy, G. (1971) ‘Herodian's person’, AncSoc 2, 204–33.Google Scholar
Alonso-Nunez, J. M. (1982) The ages of Rome, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Ando, C. (2000) Imperial ideology and provincial loyalty in the Roman empire, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Baldwin (1988) ‘Four problems with Florus’, Latomus 47, 134–42.Google Scholar
Barnes, T. D. (1971) Tertullian: A historical and literary study, Oxford.Google Scholar
Barnes, T. D. (1984) ‘The composition of Cassius Dio's Roman History’, Phoenix 38, 240–55.Google Scholar
Barnes, T. D. (1998) ‘Two passages of Justin’, CQ 48, 589–93.Google Scholar
Béranger, J. (1953) Recherches sur l'aspect idéologique du Principat, Basel.Google Scholar
Bersanetti, G. M. (1946) ‘Il padre, la madre, e la prima moglie di Settimio Severo. Con un appendice sull' uso di Dominus Noster nelle iscrizioni dell' eta Severiana’, Athenaeum 24, 38–43.Google Scholar
Bessone, L. (1993) ‘Floro: un retore storico e poeta’, ANRW II 34.1, 80–117.Google Scholar
Bleicken, J. (1978) Prinzipat und Dominat. Gedanken zur Periodisierung der römischen Kaiserzeit, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Boulvert, G. and Morabito, M. (1982) ‘Le droit de l'esclavage sous le Haut-Empire’, ANRW II 14, 98–182.Google Scholar
Bowersock, G. W. (1994) Roman Arabia, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Bradley, K. R. (1994) Slavery and society at Rome, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Buckland, W. W. (1908) The Roman law of slavery: The condition of the slave in private law from Augustus to Justinian, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Buraselis, K. (2007) Θεῖα δωρεά: das göttlich-kaiserliche Geschenk : Studien zur Politik der Severer und zur Constitutio Antoniniana, Vienna, trans. of Θεῖα δωρεά, Athens, 1985.Google Scholar
Crook, J. (1955) Consilium principis, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Dickey, E. (2002) Latin forms of address: from Plautus to Apuleius, Oxford.Google Scholar
Friedlander, L. (1919–21) Darstellungen aus der Sittengeschichte Roms in der Zeit von August bis zum Ausgang der Antonine, 9th edn, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Gabba, E. (1955) ‘Sulla “Storia Romana” di Cassio Dione’, RSI 77, 301–11.Google Scholar
Garnsey, P. (2004) ‘Roman citizenship and Roman law in the late empire’, in Swain, S. and Edwards, M. (eds.) Approaching late antiquity: the transformation from early to late empire, Oxford, 133–55.Google Scholar
Gleason, M. (2011) ‘Identity theft: doubles and masquerades in Cassius Dio's contemporary history’, CA 30, 33–86.Google Scholar
Gowing, A. M. (1990) ‘Dio's name’, CP 85, 49–54.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. T. (1976) Seneca: a philosopher in politics, Oxford.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. T. (2000) ‘The Flavians’, in Bowman, A. K., Garnsey, P. and Rathbone, D. (eds.) The Cambridge Ancient History XI2, Cambridge: 266–92.Google Scholar
Harries, J. (2013) ‘The senatus consultum Silanianum: court decisions and judicial severity in the early Roman empire’, in Du Plessis, P. J. (ed.) New frontiers: law and society in the Roman world, Edinburgh, 51–72.Google Scholar
Hornblower, S. (1991–2010) A commentary on Thucydides, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hose, M. (1994) Erneuerung der Vergangenheit: die Historiker im Imperium Romanum von Florus bis Cassius Dio, Stuttgart and Leipzig.Google Scholar
Jacques, F. and Scheid, J. (1990) Rome et l'intégration de l'empire (44 av. J.-C.–260 ap. J.-C.). Tome 1: Les structures de l'empire romain, Paris.Google Scholar
Jal, P. (1965) ‘Nature et signification politique de loeuvre de Florus’, REL 43, 358–83.Google Scholar
Jal, P. (ed.) (1967) Florus: Œuvres, Paris.Google Scholar
Jal, P. (1987) ‘A propos des Histoires Philippiques: quelques remarques’, REL 65, 194–209.Google Scholar
Kuhlmann, P. (2010) ‘Die Maecenas-Rede bei Cassius Dio: Anachronismen und intertextuelle Bezüge’, in Pausch, D. (ed.) Stimmen Der Geschichte: Funktionen Von Reden in Der Antiken Historiographie, Berlin.Google Scholar
Lavan, M. (2007) ‘Slaves to Rome: the rhetoric of mastery in Titus's speech to the Jews (Josephus Bellum Judaicum 6.328–50)’, Ramus 36, 25–38.Google Scholar
Lavan, M. (2011) ‘Slavishness in Britain and Rome in Tacitus Agricola’, CQ 61, 294–305.Google Scholar
Lavan, M. (2013) Slaves to Rome: paradigms of empire in Roman culture, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lintott, A. (1993) Imperium Romanum, London.Google Scholar
Lintott, A. W. (1997) ‘Cassius Dio and the history of the late Roman Republic’, ANRW II 34.3, 2497–523.Google Scholar
Majbom Madsen, J. (2009) Eager to be Roman: Greek responses to Roman rule in Pontus and Bithynia, London.Google Scholar
Manning, C. (1989) ‘Stoicism and slavery in the Roman empire’, ANRW II 36.3, 1518–63.Google Scholar
Marincola, J. (1997) Authority and tradtion in ancient historiography, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Millar, F. (1964) A study of Cassius Dio, Oxford.Google Scholar
Millar, F. (1993) The Roman Near East 31 BC–AD 337, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Millar, F. (2005) ‘Rome in Greek culture: Cassius Dio and Ulpian’, in Troiani, L. (ed.) La cultura storica nei primi due secoli dell'impero romano, 17–40.Google Scholar
Mommsen, T. (1887–88) Römisches Staatsrecht, 3rd edn, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Morrison, J. V. (2006) ‘Interaction of speech and narrative in Thucydides’, in Rengakos, A. and Tsakmakis, A. (eds.) Brill's Companion to Thucydides, Leiden, 251–77.Google Scholar
Noreña, C. F. (2007) ‘The social economy of Pliny's correspondence with Trajan’, AJP 128, 239–78.Google Scholar
Noreña, C. F. (2011) Imperial ideals in the Roman West: representation, circulation, power, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K. (2004) The discovery of freedom, Chicago, trans. of Die Entdeckung der Freiheit: Zur historischen Semantik und Gesellschaftsgeschichte eines politischen Grundbegriffes der Griechen, Munich, 1985.Google Scholar
Reinhold, M. (1988) From republic to principate: an historical commentary on Cassius Dio's Roman History, Books 49–52 (36–29 BC), Atlanta.Google Scholar
de Romilly, J. (1963) Thucydides and Athenian imperialism, Oxford, trans. of Thucydides et l'impérialisme athénien: la pensée de l'historien et la genèse de l'oeuvre, Paris, 1947.Google Scholar
Rood, T. (1998) Thucydides: narrative and explanation, Oxford.Google Scholar
Sartre, M. (2005) The Middle East under Rome, Cambridge, MA, trans. of D'Alexandre à Zénobie, Paris, 2001.Google Scholar
Sherwin-White, A. N. (1973) The Roman citizenship, 2nd edn, Oxford.Google Scholar
Sidebottom, H. (1997) ‘The date of the composition of Herodian's history’, AC 66, 271–6.Google Scholar
Sidebottom, H. (1998) ‘Herodian's historical methods and understanding of history’, ANRW II 34.4, 2775–836.Google Scholar
Speidel, M. P. and Seider, R. (1988) ‘A Latin papyrus with a recruit's request for service in the auxiliary cohorts’, JEA 74, 242–4.Google Scholar
Staermann, E. M. (1964) Die Krise der Sklavenhalterordnung im Westen des Römischen Reiches, Berlin.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, P. (1982) Untersuchungen zur römischen Literatur des zweiten Jahrhunderts nach Christi Geburt, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Strasburger, H. (1958) ‘Thukydides und die politische Selbstdarstellung der Athener’, Hermes 86: 17–40 (=Studien zur älten Geschichte, 3 vols, Hildesheim, 1982–90, 2.676–708).Google Scholar
Swain, S. (1996) Hellenism and empire: language, classicism, and power in the Greek world, AD 50–250, Oxford.Google Scholar
Swain, S. (2007), ‘Introduction’, in Swain, S., Harrison, S. J. and Elsner, J. (eds.) Severan culture, Cambridge, 1–26.Google Scholar
Swan, P. M. (1997) ‘How Cassius Dio composed his Augustan books: four studies’, ANRW II 34.3, 2524–57.Google Scholar
Swan, P. M. (2004) The Augustan succession: a historical commentary on Cassius Dio's Roman History Books 55–6 (9 B.C.–A.D. 14), New York.Google Scholar
Syme, R. (1988) ‘The date of Justin and the discovery of Trogus’, Historia 37, 358–71.Google Scholar
Tamiolaki, H.-M. (2010) Liberté et esclavage chez les historiens grecs classiques. Le discours historique et politique d'Hérodote, Thucydide et Xénophon, Paris.Google Scholar
Unruh, F. (1991) Das Bild des Imperium Romanum im Spiegel der Literatur an der wende vom 2. zum 3. Jh. n. Chr., Bonn.Google Scholar
Vogt, J. (1974) Ancient slavery and the ideal of man, Oxford, trans. of Sklaverei und Humanität. Studien zur antiken Sklaverei und ihrer Erforschung, 2nd edn, Wiesbaden, 1972.Google Scholar
Westermann, W. L. (1955) The slave systems of Greek and Roman antiquity, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Wiater, N. (2011) The ideology of classicism: language, history, and identity in Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Berlin.Google Scholar
Yardley, J. C. (2000) ‘Justin on tribunates and generalships, Caesares, and Augusti’, CQ 50, 632–4.Google Scholar
Yardley, J. C. (2003) Justin and Pompeius Trogus: a study of the language of Justin's Epitome of Trogus, Toronto.Google Scholar
Yardley, J. C. and Develin, R. (1994) Justin, Epitome of the Philippic History of Pompeius Trogus, Atlanta.Google Scholar
Yardley, J. C. and Heckel, W. (eds.) (1997) Epitome of the Philippic History of Pompeius Trogus. Volume 1: Books 11–12: Alexander the Great, Oxford.Google Scholar
Yarrow, L. M. (2006) Historiography at the end of the republic: provincial perspectives on Roman rule, Oxford.Google Scholar