Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-65tv2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-29T23:47:18.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

There's no Art-To Find the Mind's Construction-In Offence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2008

Iain Davidson
Iain Davidson
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology and PalaeoanthropolgyUniversity of New EnglandArmidale NSW 2351, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The editor invited a comment on this ‘attack’ on Davidson and Noble (1989), but asked me ‘not merely toattack points of detail’. Any careful reading of Bednarik's article and comparison with the works it attacks would show that in almost every detail it lays itself open to such attack. Nevertheless I am grateful to the editor for the opportunity to set out some of the argument that Noble and I have been trying to develop, and that so clearly Bednarik has not understood. There are good reasons why it has not been understood: it is clear from every phrase of his article that our objectives are utterly different.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Cambridge Archaeological Journal , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , April 1992 , pp. 52 - 57
Copyright
Copyright © The McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Cavalli-Sforza, L.L., Piazza, A., Menozzi, P. & Mountain, J., 1988. Reconstruction of human evolution: bringing together genetic, archaeological, and linguistic data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 85, 6002–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chase, P.G., 1991. Symbols and paleolithic artefacts: style, standardization, and the imposition of arbitrary form. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 10, 193–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chase, P.G. & Dibble, H., 1987. Middle Paleolithic symbolism. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 6, 263–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheney, D.L. & Seyfarth, R.M., 1990. How Monkeys See the World. Chicago: University of Chicago PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, I., 1989a. Freedom of information: aspects of art and society in western Europe during the last ice age, in Animals into Art, ed. Morphy, H.. London: Unwin Hyman, 440–56Google Scholar
Davidson, I., 1989b. Comment on ‘Deliberate engravings on bone artefacts of Homo erectus’. Rock Art Research 5, 100–101Google Scholar
Davidson, I., 1990. Bilzingsleben and early marking. Rock Art Research 7, 52–6Google Scholar
Davidson, I., 1991a. The archaeology of language origins: a review. Antiquity 65, 39–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, I., 1991b. ‘A great thick cloud of dust’: naming and dating in the interpretation of behavior in the Late Paleolithic of Spain, in Perspectives on the Past. Theoretical Biases in Mediterranean Hunter-Gatherer Research, ed. Clark, G.A. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 194–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, I., & Noble, W., 1989. The archaeology of perception: traces of depiction and language. Current Anthropology 30, 125–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, I., & Noble, W., 1992. Language gap. Nature.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davidson, I., & Noble, W., in press. Tools and language in human evolution, in Tools, Language and Cognition in Human Evolution, eds. Gibson, K. & Ingold, T.. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
D'Errico, F., 1991. Carnivore traces or Mousterian skiffle? Rock Art Research 8, 61–3Google Scholar
Gamble, C, 1982. Interaction and alliance in Palaeolithic society. Man. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 17, 92–107Google Scholar
Geertz, C, 1964. The transition to humanity, in Horizons of Anthropology, ed. Tax, S.. Chicago: Aldine, 37–48Google Scholar
Gibson, J.J., 1966. The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems. Boston: Houghton MifflinGoogle Scholar
Greenfield, P.M., 1980. Toward an operational and logical analysis of intentionality: the use of discourse in early child language, in The Social Foundation of Language and Thought; Essays in Honor of J.S. Bruner, ed. Olson, D.. New York: Norton, 254–79Google Scholar
Gvozdover, M.D., 1989a. Ornamental decoration on artefacts of the Kostenki culture. Soviet Anthropology and Archeology 27(4), 8–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gvozdover, M.D., 1989b. The typology of female figurines of the Kostenki Paleolithic culture. Soviet Anthropology and Archeology 27 (4), 32–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harré, R. & Secord, P.F., 1972. The Explanation of Social Behaviour. Oxford: Basil BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Kroeber, A.L. & Kluckhohn, C, 1954 Culture: a Critical Review of Concepts and Definitions. New York: Vintage BooksGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, T.S., 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Leroi-Gourhan, A., 1964–5. La Geste et la Parole. Paris: Albin MichelGoogle Scholar
Lindly, J.M. & Clark, G.A., 1990. Symbolism and modern human origins. Current Anthropology 31, 233–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGrew, W.C., 1987. Tools to get food: the subsistants of the Tasmanian Aborigines and Tanzanian champanzees compared. Journal of Anthropological Research 43, 247–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGrew, W.C., 1990. The intelligent use of tools: twenty propositions. Paper pre-circulated for the Wenner-Gren Conference: Tools, Language and Intelligence‘, CascaisGoogle Scholar
McGrew, W.C. & Tutin, C.E.G., 1978. Evidence for social custom in wild chimpanzees? Man. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 13, 234–51Google Scholar
McGrew, W.C, Tutin, C.E.G. & Baldwin, P.J., 1979. Chimpanzees, tools, and termites: cross-cultural comparisons of Senegal, Tanzania, and Rio Muni. Man. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 14, 185–214Google Scholar
Marshack, A., 1982. The Roots of Civilization. New York: McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
Mead, G.H., 1934. Mind, Self and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Mellars, P., 1989. Major issues in the emergence of modern humans. Current Anthropology 30, 349–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noble, W., 1987. Perception and language: towards a complete ecological psychology, in Cognitive Psychology in Question, eds. Costall, A. & Still, A.. Brighton: Harvester Press, 128–14Google Scholar
Noble, W., in press. What kind of approach to language fits Gibson's approach to perception? Theory and PsychologyGoogle Scholar
Noble, W. & Davidson, I., 1989. On depiction and language. Current Anthropology 30, 337–42Google Scholar
Noble, W. & Davidson, I., 1991. The evolutionary emergence of modern human behaviour: language and its archaeology. Man.The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 26, 23–53Google Scholar
Noble, W. & Davidson, I., in press. Tracing the origin of the emergence of modern human behaviourGoogle Scholar
Olson, D.R., 1986. The cognitive consequences of literacy. Canadian Psychology 27, 109–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Povinelli, D.J., Parks, K.A. & Novak, M.A., 1991. Do Rhesus monkeys {Macaca mulatta) attribute knowledge and ignorance to others? Journal of Comparative Psychology 105, 318–25CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Renfrew, C, 1991. Before Babel: speculations on the origins of linguistic diversity. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 1, 3–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savage-Rumbaugh, E.S., 1986. Ape Language: from Conditioned Response to Symbol. New York: Columbia University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ucko, P.J. & Rosenfeld, A., 1967. Palaeolithic Cave Art. London: Weidenfeld and NicolsonGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L.S., 1930. Mastery of memory and thinking, reprinted in Mind in Society, eds. Cole, M., John-Steiner, V., Scribner, S. & Souberman, E.. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, (1978), 38–51Google Scholar
Wynn, T. & McGrew, W.C, 1989. An ape's eye view of the Oldowan. Man. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 24, 383–98Google Scholar