Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-p5m67 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-31T10:55:27.624Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Business Ethics from the Standpoint of Redemption: Adorno on the Possibility of Good Work

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2021

Craig Reeves  and
Matthew Sinnicks
Craig Reeves
Affiliation:
Birkbeck College, London
Matthew Sinnicks
Affiliation:
University of York
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Given his view that the modern world is “radically evil,” Theodor Adorno is an unlikely contributor to business ethics. Despite this, we argue that his work has a number of provocative implications for the field that warrant wider attention. Adorno regards our social world as damaged, unfree, and false, and we draw on this critique to outline why the achievement of good work is so rare in contemporary society, focusing in particular on the ethical demands of roles and the ideological nature of management’s self-understanding. Nevertheless, we show that Adorno’s comments on activities such as art and philosophy mean that it is possible to draw on his work in a way that contributes constructively to the conversation about good and meaningful work within business ethics.

Keywords

Adornobusiness ethicsmeaningful workcritical theoryrole ethics

Information

Type
Special Issue
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 31 , Issue 4 , October 2021 , pp. 500 - 523
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for Business Ethics

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Abend, G. 2013. The origins of business ethics in American universities, 1902–1936. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(2): 171–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abend, G. 2014. The moral background: An inquiry into the history of business ethics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adorno, T. W. 1973a. Negative dialectics. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Adorno, T. W. 1973b. The concept of sociology. In Frankfurt Institute for Social Research (Ed.), Aspects of sociology: 1–15. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Adorno, T. W. 1976. Introduction. In Adorno, T. W., Albert, H., Dahrendorf, R., Habermas, J., Pilot, H., & Popper, K. (Eds.), The positivist dispute in German sociology: 1–67. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Adorno, T. W. 1993. Hegel: Three studies. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Adorno, T. W. 2000. Problems of moral philosophy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Adorno, T. W. 2005a. Minima moralia: Reflections on a damaged life. London: Verso Books.Google Scholar
Adorno, T. W. 2005b. Free time. In Pickford, H (Trans.), Critical models: 167–76. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Adorno, T. W. 2005c. Note on human science and culture. In Pickford, H. (Trans.), Critical models: 37–40. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Adorno, T. W. 2005d. Why still philosophy. In Pickford, H. (Trans.), Critical models: 5–18. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Adorno, T. W. 2006. History and freedom: Lectures 1964–1965. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Adorno, T. W. 2008. Lectures on negative dialectics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Adorno, T. W. 2017a. An introduction to dialectics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Adorno, T. W. 2017b. Theses on need (Shuster, M. & Macdonald, I., Trans.). Adorno Studies, 1(1): 101–4.Google Scholar
Adorno, T. W., & Horkheimer, M. 2019. Towards a new manifesto. London: Verso Books.Google Scholar
Anderson, E. 2017. Private government: How employers rule our lives (and why we don’t talk about it). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Arendt, H. 1958. The human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Audi, R. 2012. Virtue ethics as a resource in business. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(2): 273–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aylsworth, T. 2020. Autonomy and manipulation: Refining the argument against persuasive advertising. Journal of Business Ethics. DOI:10.1007/s10551-020-04590-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baeza, N. 2015. The normative role of negative affect and bodily experience in Adorno. Constellations, 22(3): 354–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beadle, R., & Knight, K. 2012. Virtue and meaningful work. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(2): 433–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benton, T. 1977. Philosophical foundations of the three sociologies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bowie, N. E., & Werhane, P. H. 2004. Management ethics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Brenkert, G. G. 2019. Mind the gap! The challenges and limits of (global) business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 155(4): 917–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, A. B. 2000. Ethical challenges for business in the new millennium: Corporate social responsibility and models of management morality. Business Ethics Quarterly, 10(1): 33–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, D. 2001. Adorno, ideology and ideology critique. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 27(1): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, C. (Ed.). 2013. Social networking and impression management: Self-presentation in the digital age. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Dawkins, C. E. 2019. A normative argument for independent voice and labor unions. Journal of Business Ethics, 155(4): 1153–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deery, S., Kolar, D., & Walsh, J. 2019. Can dirty work be satisfying? A mixed method study of workers doing dirty jobs. Work, Employment, and Society, 33(4): 631–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, T. 2000. Are business managers “professionals”? Business Ethics Quarterly, 10(1): 83–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, J. 1983. Sour grapes: Studies in the subversion of rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, P. 2015. The mythology of work: How capitalism persists despite itself. London: Pluto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flyverbom, M., Deibert, R., & Matten, D. 2019. The governance of digital technology, big data, and the internet: New roles and responsibilities for business. Business and Society, 58(1): 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, R. E., & Newkirk, D. 2009. Business as a human enterprise. In Gregg, S. & Stoner, J. R. (Eds.), Rethinking business management: Examining the foundations of business education: 139–43. Princeton, NJ: ISI.Google Scholar
Freyenhagen, F. 2013. Adorno’s practical philosophy: Living less wrongly. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freyenhagen, F. 2018. Critical theory and social pathology. In Hammer, E., Honneth, A., & Gordon, P. (Eds.), Routledge companion to the Frankfurt School: 410–23. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geuss, R. 2005. Suffering and knowledge in Adorno. In Outside ethics: 111–30. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Goodman, J., & Arenas, D. 2015. Engaging ethically: A discourse ethics perspective on social shareholder engagement. Business Ethics Quarterly, 25(2): 163–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorz, A. 1985. Paths to paradise: On the liberation from work. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1987. Theory of communicative action: Vol. 2. Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Harcourt, E. 2018. Containment and “rational health”: Moran and psychoanalysis. European Journal of Philosophy, 26(2): 798–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, J. 2014. Morality, competition, and the firm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1991. Elements of the philosophy of right. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hempel, C., & Oppenheim, P. 1948. Studies in the logic of explanation. Philosophy of Science, 12: 135–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, E. C. 1951. Work and the self. In Rohrer, J. & Sherif, M. (Eds.), Social psychology at the crossroads: 313–23. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Hulatt, O. 2016. Adorno’s theory of philosophical and aesthetic truth. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Islam, G. 2012. Recognition, reification, and practices of forgetting: Ethical implications of human resource management. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(1): 37–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jager, L. 2003. Adorno: A political biography. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Jeffries, S. 2016. Grand hotel abyss: The lives of the Frankfurt School. New York: Verso Books.Google Scholar
Jeske, D., & Shultz, K. S. 2016. Using social media content for screening in recruitment and selection: pros and cons. Work, Employment, and Society, 30(3): 535–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jutten, T. 2010. Adorno on Kant, freedom and determinism. European Journal of Philosophy, 20(4): 548–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keat, R. 1981. The politics of social theory: Habermas, Freud and the critique of positivism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Klikauer, T. 2015. Critical management studies and critical theory: A review. Capital and Class, 39(2): 197–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Léné, A. 2019. Job satisfaction and bad jobs: Why are cleaners so happy at work? Work, Employment, and Society, 33(4): 666–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippke, R. L. 1999. The “necessary evil” defense of manipulative advertising. Business & Professional Ethics Journal, 18(1): 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacIntyre, A. 2007. After virtue (3rd ed.). London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Marcoux, A. 2009. Business-focused business ethics. In Smith, J. (Ed.), Normative theory and business ethics: 17–34. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Marx, K. 1978. Economic and philosophic manuscripts of 1844, in Tucker, R. C. (Ed.), The Marx–Engels reader (2nd ed.): 66–125. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Melé, D. 2001. Loyalty in business: Subversive doctrine or real need? Business Ethics Quarterly, 11(1): 11–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, G. 2008. Re-imagining the morality of management: A modern virtue ethics approach. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(4): 483–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller-Doohm, S. 2003. Adorno. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Munro, I., & Thanem, T. 2018. The ethics of affective leadership: Organizing good encounters without leaders. Business Ethics Quarterly, 28(1): 51–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musílek, K., Jamie, K., & McKie, L. 2020. Cold winds and warm attachments: Interrogating the personal attachment to neoliberal work and economy. Work, Employment, and Society, 34(3): 514–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neurath, O. 1973. Empirical sociology. In Cohen, R. & Neurath, M. (Eds.), Empiricism and sociology: 319–421. Dordrecht, Netherlands: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nevasto, J. 2019. The concept of need in the thought of Theodor Adorno. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Essex.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. 2001. Adaptive preferences and women’s options. Economics and Philosophy, 17(1): 67–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Connor, B. 2004. Adorno’s negative dialectic: Philosophy and the possibility of critical rationality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Outhwaite, W. 1987. New philosophies of social science. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, M. 2003. Business, ethics and business ethics: Critical theory and negative dialectics. In Alvesson, M. & Willmott, H. (Eds.), Studying management critically: 197–219. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popper, K. 2002. The logic of scientific discovery. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Raz, J. 1986. The morality of freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reeves, C. 2009a. Causality and critical theory. Journal of Critical Realism, 8(3): 316–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeves, C. 2009b. “Exploding the limits of the law”: Judgement and freedom in Arendt and Adorno. Res Publica, 15(2): 137–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeves, C. 2016a. Adorno, freedom and criminal law. Law and Critique, 27(3): 323–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeves, C. 2016b. Beyond the postmetaphysical turn: Ethics and metaphysics in critical theory. Journal of Critical Realism, 15(3): 217–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Root, T., & McKay, S. 2014. Student awareness of the use of social media screening by prospective employers. Journal of Education for Business, 89: 202–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubery, J., Grimshaw, D., Keizer, A., & Johnson, M. 2018. Challenges and contradictions in the “normalising” of precarious work. Work, Employment, and Society, 32(3): 509–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Satz, D. 2010. Why some things should not be for sale: The moral limits of markets. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayer, A. 1992. Method in social science. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Scherer, A. G. 2015. Can hypernorms be justified? Insights from a discourse–ethical perspective. Business Ethics Quarterly, 25(4): 489–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. 2007. Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(4): 1096–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, W. H. 2009. Marxism, business ethics, and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(4): 565–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinnicks, M. 2018. Leadership after virtue: Macintyre’s critique of management reconsidered. Journal of Business Ethics, 147(4): 735–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinnicks, M. 2020. “We ought to eat in order to work, not vice versa”: MacIntyre, practices, and the best work for humankind. Journal of Business Ethics. DOI:10.1007/s10551-020-04603-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sison, A. J. G., Ferrero, I., & Guitián, G. 2016. Human dignity and the dignity of work: Insights from Catholic social teaching. Business Ethics Quarterly, 26(4): 503–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slovensky, R., & Ross, W. H. 2012. Should human resource managers use social media to screen job applicants? Managerial and legal issues in the USA. info, 14(1): 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, E. 2000. Just business: Business ethics in action (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sykes, G., & Matza, D. 1957. Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22: 664–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsoukas, H. 2019. Philosophical organization theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van Iddekinge, C. H., Lanivich, S. E., Roth, P. L., & Junco, E. 2016. Social media for selection? Validity and adverse impact potential of a Facebook-based assessment. Journal of Management, 42(7): 1811–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varelius, J. 2009. Is whistle-blowing compatible with employee loyalty? Journal of Business Ethics, 85(2): 263–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visser, M. 2019. Pragmatism, critical theory and business ethics: Converging lines. Journal of Business Ethics, 156(1): 45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Kriegstein, H. 2016. Professionalism, agency, and market failures. Business Ethics Quarterly, 26(4): 445–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wicks, A. C., Werhane, P. H., Elms, H., & Nolan, J. 2020. Spheres of influence: A Walzerian approach to business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics. DOI:10.1007/s10551-020-04616-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiggerhaus, R. 1994. The Frankfurt School: Its history, theories and political significance. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Yeoman, R. 2014. Conceptualising meaningful work as a fundamental human need. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(2): 235–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuidervaart, L. 1991. Adorno’s aesthetic theory: The redemption of illusion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Zuidervaart, L. 2007. Social philosophy after Adorno. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar