Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-pvkqz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-09T14:42:44.816Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Business Ethics Assessment Criteria: Business V. Philosophy—Survey Results

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Donald Morris
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

This paper presents the results of and conclusions from a survey of 2,830 college and university undergraduate business and philosophy departments regarding their business ethics offerings. The impetus for this survey included seeking a better understanding of the problems for which business ethics courses are the solution. It was proposed that, if we knew what it is that professors teaching business ethics believe they are teaching—not in terms of content or methods, but in terms of what criteria they are using to assess students’ achievement of the course objectives—we would have a better understanding of what issues business ethics attempts to resolve. The survey focused on ranking six possible assessment criteria drawn from the literature on teaching business ethics.

In addition to disclosing the specific survey results, the paper draws conclusions based on the fact that there are statistically significant differences between the rankings assigned to the six assessment criteria by business professors as contrasted with philosophy professors. The results of the survey indicate that there is more uniformity expressed in the responses by the philosophy professors teaching business ethics than by the business professors.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 11 , Issue 4 , October 2001 , pp. 623 - 650
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Baier, Kurt. 1995. The Rational and the Moral Order. Peru, Ill.: Open Court.Google Scholar
Bearchamp, Tom L. and Bowie, Norman E. 1997. Ethical Theory and Business, 5th ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Boomer, Michael, Gratto, Clarence, Gravander, Jerry, and Tuttle, Mark. 1987. “A Behavioral Model of Ethical and Unethical Decision Making.” Journal of Business Ethics 6: 265–280.Google Scholar
Brady, F. Neil. 1999. “A Systematic Approach to Teaching Business Ethics.” Journal of Business Ethics 19: 309–318.Google Scholar
Callahan, Daniel. 1980. “Goals in the Teaching of Ethics.” Ethics Teaching in Higher Education, ed. Callahan, D. and Bok, S.New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caplan, Arthur L. 1980. “Evaluation and the Teaching of Ethics.” Ethics Teaching in Higher Education, ed. Callahan, D. and Bok, S.New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Collins, Denis. 2000. “The Quest to Improve the Human Condition: The First 1500 Articles Published in the Journal of Business Ethics.” Journal of Business Ethics 26: 1–73.Google Scholar
Collins, Denis and Wartick, Steven L. 1995. “Business and Society/Business Ethics Courses: Twenty Years at the Crossroads.” Business and Society 34 (1): 51–89.Google Scholar
DeGeorge, Richard T. 1999. Business Ethics, 5th ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Derry, Robbin and Green, Ronald M. 1989. “Ethical Theory in Business Ethics: A Critical Assessment.” Journal of Business Ethics 8: 521–533.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1950. Human Nature and Conduct. New York: The Modern Library.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Thomas and Werhane, Patricia H. 1996. Ethical Issues in Business, 5th ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Duska, Ronald F. 1991. “What’s the Point of a Business Ethics Course?” Business Ethics Quarterly 1(4): 335–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gautschi, Frederick H., Ill and Jones, Thomas M. 1998. “Enhancing the Ability of Business Students to Recognize Ethical Issues: An Empirical Assessment of the Effectiveness of a Course in Business Ethics.” Journal of Business Ethics 17: 205–216.Google Scholar
George, Richard J. 1987. “Teaching Business Ethics: Is There a Gap Between Rhetoric and Reality?” Journal of Business Ethics 6: 513–518.Google Scholar
Hare, R. M. 1981. Moral Thinking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hartman, Edwin M. 1994. “The Status of Business Ethics.” Business & Professional Ethics Journal 13(4): 3–30.Google Scholar
Herndon, N. C. 1986. “A New Context for Ethics Education Objectives in a College of Business: Ethical Decision-Making Models.” Journal of Business Ethics 15: 501–510.Google Scholar
Hoffman, W. Michael and Moore, Jennifer Mills. 1982. “Results of a Business Ethics Curriculum Survey Conducted by the Center for Business Ethics.” Journal of Business Ethics 1: 81–83.Google Scholar
Holt, D., Heischmidt, K., Hill, H.Hammer, Robinson B., and Wiles, J. 1998. “When Philosophy and Business Professors Talk: Assessment of Ethical Reasoning in a Cross Disciplinary Business Ethics Course.” Teaching Business Ethics 1: 253–268.Google Scholar
Hosmer, LaRue T. 1985. “The Other 338: Why a Majority of Our Schools of Business Administration Do Not Offer a Course in Business Ethics.” Journal of Business Ethics 4: 17–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, E. R. 1998. “The One Necessary Condition for a Successful Business Ethics Course: The Teacher Must be a Philosopher.” Business Ethics Quarterly 8(3): 561–574.Google Scholar
Kohlberg, Lawrence. 1969. “Stage and Sequence: The Cognitive Development Approach to Socialization.” Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research, ed. Goslin, D. A.Chicago: Rand McNally, 347–480.Google Scholar
Kracher, Beverly. 1999. “What Does it Mean When Mitchell Gets an ‘A’ in Business Ethics? Or the Importance of Service Learning.” Teaching Business Ethics 2: 1991–303.Google Scholar
McDonald, Gael M. and Donleavy, Gabriel D. 1995. “Objections to the Teaching of Business Ethics.” Journal of Business Ethics 14(10): 839–853.Google Scholar
McDonald, Ross A. 1997. “Information and Transformation in Teaching Business Ethics.” Teaching Business Ethics 1: 151–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nash, Laura L. 1981. “Ethics Without the Sermon.” Harvard Business Review (Nov.-Dec).Google Scholar
Oddo, Alfonso R. 1997. “A Framework for Teaching Business Ethics.” Journal of Business Ethics 16 (3): 293–297.Google Scholar
Plato. 1965. Plato’s Meno. Ed. Sesonske, A. and Fleming, N.Wadsworth Publishing Company, Inc.: Belmont California.Google Scholar
Pamental, George L. 1991. “The Course in Business Ethics: Why Don’t Philosophers Give Business Students What They Need?” Business Ethics Quarterly 1(4): 385–393.Google Scholar
Randall, D. M. and Gibson, A. M. 1990. “Methodology in Business Ethics Research: A Review and Critical Assessment.” Journal of Business Ethics 9: 457–471.Google Scholar
Schoenfeldt, Lyle E, McDonald, Don M., and Youngblood, Stuart A. 1991. “The Teaching of Business Ethics: A Survey of AACSB Member Schools.” Journal of Business Ethics 10: 237–241.Google Scholar
Seshardri, Srivatsa, Broekemier, Greg M., and Nelson, Jon W. 1997. “Business Ethics—To Teach or not to Teach.” Teaching Business Ethics 1: 301–313.Google Scholar
Shaw, William H. 1996. “Business Ethics Today: A Survey.” Journal of Business Ethics 15: 489–500.Google Scholar
Sims, Ronald R. and Sims, Serbrenia J. 1991. “Increasing Applied Business Ethics Courses in Business School Curricula.” Journal of Business Ethics 10: 211–219.Google Scholar
Smith, Michael. 1995. The Moral Problem. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Trevino, Linda Klebe. 1992. “Moral Reasoning and Business Ethics: Implications for Research, Education and Management.” Journal of Business Ethics. 11 (5, 6): 445–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trevino, Linda Klebe and Weaver, Gary R. 1994. “Business ETHICS/BUSINESS Ethics: One Field or Two?” Business Ethics Quarterly 4: 113–128.Google Scholar
Velasquez, Manuel G. 1998. Business Ethics Concepts and Cases, 4th ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Victor, Bart and Stephens, Carroll Underwood. 1994. “Business Ethics: A Synthesis of Normative Philosophy and Empirical Social Science.” Business Ethics Quarterly 4: 145–155.Google Scholar
Walvoord, Barbara E. and Anderson, Virginia Johnson. 1998. Effective Grading, A Tool for Learning and Assessment. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
Weaver, Gary R. and Trevino, Linda Klebe. 1994. “Normative and Empirical Business Ethics: Separation, Marriage of Convenience, or Marriage of Necessity?” Business Ethics Quarterly 4: 129–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, Art. 1991. “Reflections on Business Ethics: What is It? What Causes It? And, What Should a Course in Business Ethics Include? Business Ethics Quarterly 1(4): 409–439.Google Scholar