Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-hn9fh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-25T02:28:50.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

When Integration Fails: The Logic of Prescription and Description in Business Ethics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Thomas Donaldson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In an engaging and provocative paper, Linda Trevino and Gary Weaver spell out the differences between the methodological approach characteristic of the natural sciences on the one hand and that of normative inquiry on the other (Trevino and Weaver, 1991). Near the end of their paper they raise a haunting question that will have increasing significance as the management literature in ethics evolves: namely, “Can the two approaches be integrated?”

As C. P. Snow (1962) noted, no one can deny either the stark differences between the two worlds of normative and empirical inquiry, or the mutual suspicion shown by their inhabitants. The methodology of natural science implies a non-normative, thoroughly descriptive vision of the world in which reality awaits discovery by the scientist prepared to use increasingly sophisticated techniques. In contrast, the methodology of normative inquiry, i.e., that of traditional moral philosophy, implies a world-vision in which most important issues are allocated to ethics, where empirical pursuits are frequently trivial and always require ethical guidance, and where empirical theories contain normative presuppositions unrecognized as normative even by their scientific adherents.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , April 1994 , pp. 157 - 169
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aristotle. 1976. Ethica: The Ethics of Aristotle. Thompson, J. A. K., trans. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. 1789. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation.Google Scholar
Bok, Sissela. 1978. Lying: Moral Choice in Public and Private Life. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Bowie, Norman E. 1982. Business Ethics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Copp, David. 1992. Metaethics. In Becker, Lawrence D. and Becker, Charlotte B. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Ethics, Vol. II. (New York and London: Garland Publishing, Inc., 1992), pp. 790–98.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Thomas. Corporation and Morality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Thomas. 1989. The Ethics of International Business. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Thomas, and Dunfee, Thomas. “Toward a Unified Conception of Business Ethics: Integrative Social Contracts Theory,” Academy of Management Review, 19, 1994.Google Scholar
Dunfee, Thomas W. 1991. “Business Ethics and Extant Social Contracts.” Business Ethics Quarterly 1 (1): 23–51.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emil. 1985. Les Regles de la Méthode Sociologique. Paris: Felix Alean.Google Scholar
Frederick, William C. 1991. “Anchoring values in Nature: Toward a Theory of Business Values,” presented as the presidential address to the Society for Business Ethics, Miami Beach, Florida, August 10, 1991.Google Scholar
Gauthier, David. 1986. Morals By Agreement. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1651. Leviathan.Google Scholar
Hume, David. 1737. A Treatise of Human Nature.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1939. Perpetual Peace. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, trans. Beck, L. W.. 1959. Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals. New York: Liberal Arts Press.Google Scholar
Kohlberg, Lawrence. Moral Stages: A Current Formulation and a Response to Critics. New York: Karger, 1983.Google Scholar
Maslow, Abraham H. 1959. New Knowledge in Human Values. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. 1959 [1903]. Principia Ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Perry, Ralph Barton. 1926. General Theory of Value. New York: Longmans, Green, 1926.Google Scholar
Plato. 1968. The Republic. Tran., Bloom, Allan. New York: Basic Books. Book I.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Searle, John R.Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Snow, C. P. 1962. Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Stevenson, Charles L. 1944. Ethics and Language. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Trevino, Linda Klebe, and Weaver, Gary R. 1991. “Business ETHICS/BUSINESS Ethics: One Field Or Two?” (in press).Google Scholar
Wilson, Edward O. 1978. Sociobiology. Harvard University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Van Luijk, Henk. 1992. “Rights and Interests in a Participatory Market Society,” pp. 01–31. Unpublished paper presented at INSEAD, February 10, 1992.Google Scholar
Wood, Donna J. 1991. “Corporate Social Performance Revisited,” in Academy of Management Review, pp. 691–718.Google Scholar