Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-dbm8p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-03T15:43:32.855Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

“Public Hospitals in Critical Condition”: Death and Love as Embodied Care and Political Mobilization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2025

Ludivine Perray-Redslob
Affiliation:
emlyon business school , France
Nathalie Clavijo
Affiliation:
TBS Business School , France
Agathe Morinière
Affiliation:
emlyon business school , France

Abstract

This article examines how hospital workers engage in embodied mobilizations drawing on the life-affirming power of death and love to resist the demise of the French public hospital system. Drawing on Butler’s work on “What is a livable life” (2022a, 2022b) and Notes toward a performative theory of assembly (2015), the study analyses a four-year data collection of Facebook posts, from two activist collectives of hospital workers. Our findings highlight three forms of ethical resistance. First, hospital workers mobilize the symbolism of death to denounce the erosion of public healthcare infrastructure and to urge the public to help save it. Second, they use this symbolism to shed light on the precariousness of their working conditions and to elicit compassionate care from citizens. Third, they make the symbolism of love for public healthcare visible, prompting reflection on the importance of public service values in a society rooted in solidarity and mutual care. This work contributes to the literature at the intersection of social mobilization and ethics of care: first, it brings to the front death and love as symbols that illuminate the radical political potential of care in social movements; second, it advances the theoretical construct of “ethics of publicness.”

Information

Type
Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for Business Ethics

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Alakavuklar, O. N., & Alamgir, F. 2018. Ethics of resistance in organisations: A conceptual proposalJournal of Business Ethics149: 3143.10.1007/s10551-017-3631-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldossari, M., & Calvard, T. 2022. The politics and ethics of resistance, feminism and gender equality in Saudi Arabian organizationsJournal of Business Ethics181(4): 873890.10.1007/s10551-021-04949-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barros, M. 2018. Digitally crafting a resistant professional identity: The case of Brazilian ‘dirty’ bloggers. Organization, 25(6): 755783.10.1177/1350508418759185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, E. 2012. Ways of seeing organisational death: A critical semiotic analysis of organisational memorialisationVisual Studies27(1): 417.10.1080/1472586X.2012.642954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, E., & Taylor, S. 2015. Vernacular mourning and corporate memorialization in framing the death of Steve JobsOrganization23(1): 114–32.10.1177/1350508415605109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, E., Meriläinen, S., Taylor, S., & Tienari, J. 2019. Time’s up! Feminist theory and activism meets organization studiesHuman relations72(1) : 422.Google Scholar
Bizouarn, P. & Crozier, S. 2022. Hôpital public: une minute de silence pour se faire entendre. Libération, January 26. https://www.liberation.fr/idees-et-debats/tribunes/hopital-public-une-minute-de-silence-pour-se-faire-entendre-20220126_UC4ACT57FBENRK5VFGW5CRAOX4/.Google Scholar
Blanc, S., & Al-Amoudi, I. 2013. Corporate institutions in a weakened welfare state: A Rawlsian perspective. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(4): 497525.Google Scholar
Branicki, L. 2020. COVID-19, ethics of care and feminist crisis management. Gender, Work and Organizations, 27(5): 872–83.Google ScholarPubMed
Butler, J. 2004. Precarious life: The powers of mourning and violence. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Butler, J. 2015. Notes toward a performative theory of assembly. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674495548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, J. 2016. Rethinking vulnerability in resistance. In Butler, J., Gambetti, Z., & Sabsay, L. (Eds.), Vulnerability in Resistance: 1227. Durham, NC: Duke University Press 10.1215/9780822373490-002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, J. 2022a. A livable life? An inhabitable world? Scheler on the tragic. Puncta, 5(2): 827.10.5399/pjcp.v5i2.2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, J. 2022bWhat world is this? A pandemic phenomenology. New York: Columbia University Press.10.7312/butl20828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courpasson, D., & Marti, I. 2019. Collective ethics of resistance: The organization of survival in the Warsaw GhettoOrganization26(6): 853–72.10.1177/1350508418820993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daskalaki, M., & Fotaki, M. 2024. Resisting extractivism as a feminist critical socio‐spatial practiceGender, Work & Organization31(3): 9831011.10.1111/gwao.13042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Bakker, F. G., Den Hond, F., King, B., & Weber, K. 2013. Social movements, civil society and corporations: Taking stock and looking aheadOrganization studies34(5–6): 573–93.10.1177/0170840613479222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, W. M., & Wiebe, E. 2010. Praxis makes perfect: Recovering the ethical promise of critical management studiesJournal of Business Ethics94: 271–83.Google Scholar
Fotaki, M. 2017. Relational ties of love: A psychosocial proposal for ethics of compassionate care in health and public services. Psychodynamic Practice, 23(2): 181–89.10.1080/14753634.2016.1238159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fotaki, M. 2021. Feminist research changing organizations and societies: Taking stock and looking to the future. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 30(3): 390–99.10.1080/1359432X.2020.1765862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fotaki, M. 2023. Why do we desire and fear care: Toward developing a holistic political approach. Organization Theory, 4(1): 123.10.1177/26317877231159683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fotaki, M., & Daskalaki, M. 2020. Politicizing the body in the anti-mining protest in GreeceOrganization Studies42(8): 1265–90.10.1177/0170840619882955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fotaki, M., & Harding, N. 2017. Gender and the organization: Women at work in the 21st century. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.10.4324/9780203073933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fotaki, M., & Kenny, K. 2020. Coronavirus shows the dangers of letting market forces govern health and social care. The Conversation, July 14. https://theconversation.com/coronavirus-shows-the-dangers-ofletting-market-forces-govern-health-and-social-care-139573.Google Scholar
Fotaki, M., & Pullen, A. 2024. Feminist theories and activist practices in organization studiesOrganization Studies45(4): 593616.10.1177/01708406231209861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, B. 2008. Putting emotion and reflexivity to work in researching migration. Sociology, 42(5): 935–52.10.1177/0038038508094571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansson, J., & Wickström, A. 2023. Constructing a “different” strength: A feminist exploration of vulnerability, ethical agency and careJournal of Business Ethics184(2): 317–31.10.1007/s10551-022-05121-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, K. 2018. Censored: Whistleblowers and impossible speech. Human Relations, 71(8): 1025–48.10.1177/0018726717733311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, K. 2024. Feminist social movements and whistleblowing disclosures: Ireland’s Women of Honour. Gender, Work & Organization, 31(3) : 961–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Theule, M. A., Lambert, C., & Morales, J. 2020. Governing death: Organizing end-of-life situationsOrganization Studies41(4): 523–42.10.1177/0170840618800107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Theule, M. A., Lambert, C., & Morales, J. 2023. Accounting to the end of life. Scarcity, performance and death, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 90: 102377.10.1016/j.cpa.2021.102377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, K. 2022. Care and capitalism: Why affective equality matters for social justice. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Mandalaki, E. 2022. Affective diaries of quarantine: Writing as mourning. Organization, 31(2): 335–57.10.1177/13505084221115839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandalaki, E., & Fotaki, M. 2020. The bodies of the commons: Towards a relational embodied ethics of the commons. Journal of Business Ethics, 166(4): 745–60.10.1007/s10551-020-04581-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, L., & Glozer, S. 2021. Heart, mind and body: #NoMorePage3 and the replenishment of emotional energy. Organization Studies, 43(3): 369–94.10.1177/0170840621994501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMurray, R., Pullen, A., & Rhodes, C. 2011. Ethical subjectivity and politics in organizations: A case of health care tendering. Organization, 18(4): 541–61.10.1177/1350508410388336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morinière, A. 2023. Ethical implications of acceleration: Perspectives from health professionals. Journal of Business Ethics, 188(4), 741–58.10.1007/s10551-023-05499-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morinière, A., & Georgescu, I. 2022. Hybridity and the use of performance measurement: facilitating compromises or creating moral struggles? Insights from healthcare organizations. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 35(3): 801–29.10.1108/AAAJ-12-2019-4309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, M. 2003. Introduction: Ethics, politics and organizingOrganization10(2): 187203.10.1177/1350508403010002001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, M., Cheney, G., Fournier, V., & Land, C. 2014. The question of organization: A manifesto for alternativesEphemera Theory & Politics in Organization14(4): 623–38.Google Scholar
Pullen, A., & Rhodes, C. 2014. Corporeal ethics and the politics of resistance in organizations. Organization, 21(6): 782–96.10.1177/1350508413484819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pullen, A., & Rhodes, C. 2015. Ethics, embodiment and organizations. Organization, 22(2): 159–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pullen, A., & Rhodes, C. 2022. Organizing corporeal ethics: A research overview. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Reedy, P., King, D., & Coupland, C. 2016. Organizing for individuation: Alternative organizing, politics and new identitiesOrganization Studies37(11): 1553–73.10.1177/0170840616641983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhodes, C., Pullen, A., & Clegg, S. R. 2010. “If I should fall from grace…”: Stories of change and organizational ethicsJournal of Business Ethics91: 535–51.Google Scholar
Rhodes, C., & Wray-Bliss, E. 2012. The ethical difference of organization. Organization, 20(1): 3950.10.1177/1350508412460999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skeggs, B. 2001. The toilet paper: Femininity, class and mis-recognition. Women’s Studies International Forum, 24(3–4): 295307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smolović-Jones, N., Johansson, M., Pullen, A., & Giritli-Nygren, K. 2024. Feminism and social movements: Notes on hope and despairGender, Work and Organization31(3): 954–60.10.1111/gwao.13121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thanem, T., & Knights, D. 2019Embodied research methods. London: Sage.10.4135/9781529716672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, M. 2018. Reassembling difference? Rethinking inclusion through/as embodied ethics. Human Relations, 72(1): 4868.10.1177/0018726718764264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vachhani, S. J. 2020. Envisioning a democratic culture of difference: Feminist ethics and the politics of dissent in social movementsJournal of Business Ethics164(4): 745–57.Google Scholar
Vachhani, S. 2024. Networked feminism in a digital age—mobilizing vulnerability and reconfiguring feminist politics in digital activism. Gender, Work and Organizations, 31(3): 1031–48.10.1111/gwao.13097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vachhani, S. J., & Pullen, A. 2018. Ethics, politics and feminist organizing: Writing feminist infrapolitics and affective solidarity into everyday sexism. Human Relations, 72(1): 2347.10.1177/0018726718780988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiskopf, R., & Willmott, H. 2013. Ethics as critical practice: the “Pentagon Papers,” deciding responsibly, truth-telling, and the unsettling of organizational moralityOrganization Studies34(4): 469–93.10.1177/0170840612470256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Younes, D., Courpasson, D., & Jacob, M. R. 2020. Ethics from below: Secrecy and the maintenance of ethicsJournal of Business Ethics163(3): 451–66.10.1007/s10551-018-4029-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar