Hostname: page-component-6bb9c88b65-2jdt9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-23T17:21:00.881Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Accepted manuscript

Inequity and food insecurity and effects on obesity and associated co-morbidities: meeting report and research priorities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 July 2025

CHS Ruxton
Affiliation:
Nutrition Communications, Cupar, UK
M Bateson
Affiliation:
Biosciences Institute/Centre for Behaviour and Evolution, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
N Garner
Affiliation:
Norwich Medical School and Norwich Institute of Healthy Ageing (NIHA), University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
K Harvey
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, The University of Reading, PO Box 217, Reading, UK
H Lambie-Mumford
Affiliation:
Department of Politics, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
L Levy
Affiliation:
Department of Politics, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
A McDonald
Affiliation:
Expert Adviser, Office of Health Improvement and disparities, Department of Health and Social Care, UK; Honorary Visiting Professor, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Society, University of Chester, UK; Food Standards Scotland, Aberdeen, UK
HM Parretti
Affiliation:
Norwich Medical School and Norwich Institute of Healthy Ageing (NIHA), University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
A.W. Walker
Affiliation:
Rowett Institute, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
F Thies
Affiliation:
Rowett Institute, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
AM Minihane
Affiliation:
Norwich Medical School and Norwich Institute of Healthy Ageing (NIHA), University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
S Fairweather-Tait
Affiliation:
Norwich Medical School and Norwich Institute of Healthy Ageing (NIHA), University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
JV Woodside
Affiliation:
Centre for Public Health, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK;
JA Lovegrove
Affiliation:
Hugh Sinclair Unit of Human Nutrition and the Institute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Research, Department of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
BM Corfe*
Affiliation:
Human Nutrition and Exercise Research Centre, Population and Health Science Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK;
*
*Author for Correspondence: Prof Bernard Corfe, Human Nutrition and Exercise Research Centre, Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, NE2 4HH; email: bernard.corfe@newcastle.ac.uk; Tel: +44 (0)114 215 9044; fax: +44 (0)114 271 3314
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A Rank Forum was convened to discuss the evidence around food insecurity (FIS), its impact on health, and interventions which could make a difference both at individual and societal level, with a focus on the UK. This paper summarises the proceedings and recommendations. Speakers highlighted the growing issue of FIS due to current economic and social pressures. It was clear that the health implications of FIS varied geographically since food insecure women in higher income regions tend to be living with overweight or obesity, in contrast to those living in low-to-middle income countries. This paradox could be due to stress and/or metabolic or behavioural responses to an unpredictable food supply. The gut microbiota may play a role given the negative effects of low fibre diets on bacterial diversity, species balance and chronic disease risk. Solutions to FIS involve individual behavioural change, targeted services and societal/policy change. Obesity-related services are currently difficult to access. Whilst poverty is the root cause of FIS, it cannot be solved simply by making healthy food cheaper due to various ingrained beliefs, attitudes and behaviours in target groups. Person-centred models, such as Capability-Opportunity-Motivation Behavioural Change Techniques and Elicit-Provide-Elicit communication techniques are recommended. Societal change or improved resilience through psychological support may be more equitable ways to address FIS and can combine fiscal or food environment policies to shift purchasing towards healthier foods. However, policy implementation can be slow to enact due to the need for strong evidence, consultation and political will. Eradicating FIS must involve co-creation of interventions and policies to ensure that all stakeholders reach a consensus on solutions.

Information

Type
Workshop Report
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society