Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-rz4zl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-04T12:28:10.748Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Food wasting behaviour in Türkiye: adaptation of the Food Wasting Behaviours Questionnaire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2025

Gamze Kendirli
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Nuh Naci Yazgan University, Kayseri, Türkiye
Gizem Aytekin-Sahin*
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Nuh Naci Yazgan University, Kayseri, Türkiye Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
Ozge Mengi Celik
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Gulhane Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Türkiye
Michal Misiak
Affiliation:
IDN Being Human, Institute of Psychology, University of Wroclaw, Wroclaw, Poland School of Anthropology & Museum Ethnography, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
*
Corresponding author: Gizem Aytekin-Sahin; Email: gasahin@nny.edu.tr

Abstract

Understanding consumers’ food wasting behaviours is crucial to reducing food waste. This study aimed to adapt the Food Wasting Behaviours Questionnaire (FWBQ) to Turkish and evaluate its validity and reliability. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 421 adults, preceded by a pilot study with thirty individuals to assess the intelligibility of the questionnaire. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed on a subsample of 219 participants, followed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on an independent subsample of 202 participants. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha (CA), and test-retest reliability was evaluated with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) in a separate group of 100 participants. As a result of EFA, a six-factor structure emerged – diverging from the original five-factor model of the FWBQ – indicating that in the Turkish context, planning meals and planning shopping behaviours formed distinct dimensions. Three items with low factor loadings (< 0·30) were excluded, and the final version included twenty-seven items with a total explained variance of 57·3 %. CFA confirmed good model fit, and internal consistency was strong (CA = 0·700 to 0·924). Test-retest reliability was also high (ICC = 0·787 to 0·896). In conclusion, the Turkish version of the FWBQ is a valid and reliable tool for assessing a wide range of food wasting behaviours. The emergence of a sixth factor highlights the importance of cultural context in shaping food management routines and has implications for cross-cultural comparisons and future adaptations.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Mbow, C, Rosenzweig, C, Barioni, LG, et al. (2019) Food security. In Climate Change and Land: An IPCC Special Report on Climate Change, Desertification, Land Degradation, Sustainable Land Management, Food Security, and Greenhouse Gas Fluxes in Terrestrial Ecosystems, pp. 437550 [Shukla, PR, Skea, J, Calvo Buendia, E, et al., editors]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
United Nations Environment Programme (2024) Food Waste Index Report 2024. Think Eat Save: Tracking Progress to Halve Global Food Waste. https://wedocs.unep.org/20.500.11822/45230 (accessed March 2024).Google Scholar
Roodhuyzen, DMA, Luning, PA, Fogliano, V, et al. (2017) Putting together the puzzle of consumer food waste: towards an integral perspective. Trends Food Sci Technol 68, 3750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization-FAO (2019) The State of Food and Agriculture. Moving Forward on Food Loss and Waste Reduction. Rome. https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/11f9288f-dc78–4171–8d02–92235b8d7dc7/content (accessed May 2024).Google Scholar
Quested, TE, Marsh, E, Stunell, D, et al. (2013) Spaghetti soup: the complex world of food waste behaviours. Resour Conserv Recycl 79, 4351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Principato, L, Mattia, G, Di Leo, A, et al. (2021) The household wasteful behaviour framework: a systematic review of consumer food waste. Industrial Marketing Manage 93, 641649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schanes, K, Dobernig, K & Gözet, B (2018) Food waste matters – a systematic review of household food waste practices and their policy implications. J Clean Prod 182, 978991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghinea, C & Ghiuta, OA (2019) Household food waste generation: young consumers behaviour, habits and attitudes. Int J Environ Sci Technol 16, 21852200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stefan, V, van Herpen, E, Tudoran, AA, et al. (2013) Avoiding food waste by Romanian consumers: the importance of planning and shopping routines. Food Qual Prefer 28, 375381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aydin, AE & Yildirim, P (2021) Understanding food waste behavior: the role of morals, habits and knowledge. J Clean Prod 280, 124250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babbitt, CW, Babbitt, GA & Oehman, JM (2021) Behavioral impacts on residential food provisioning, use, and waste during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustain Prod Consum 28, 315325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stancu, V, Haugaard, P & Lähteenmäki, L (2016) Determinants of consumer food waste behaviour: two routes to food waste. Appetite 96, 717.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Misiak, M, Sobol, M, Sakowski, L, et al. (2023) Five ways to waste food: food wasting behaviours questionnaire. Br Food J 125, 34373455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank (2024) World Bank Country and Lending Groups. https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519-world-bank-country-and-lending-groups (accessed November 2024).Google Scholar
Chen, C, Chaudhary, A & Mathys, A (2020) Nutritional and environmental losses embedded in global food waste. Resour Conserv Recycl 160, 104912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations Environment Programme (2021) Food Waste Index Report 2021. Nairobi. https://www.unep.org/resources/report/unep-food-waste-index-report-2021 (accessed March 2024).Google Scholar
Salihoglu, G, Salihoglu, NK, Ucaroglu, S, et al. (2018) Food loss and waste management in Turkey. Bioresour Technol 248, 8899.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
COMCEC (2017) Reducing Food Waste in the OIC Countries. Standing Committee for Economic and Commercial Cooperation of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation. Ankara: COMCEC Coordination Office.Google Scholar
Secer, A, Masotti, M, Iori, E, et al. (2023) Do culture and consciousness matter? A study on motivational drivers of household food waste reduction in Turkey. Sustain Prod Consum 38, 6979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aydin, H & Aydin, C (2022) Investigating consumers’ food waste behaviors: an extended theory of planned behavior of Turkey sample. Cleaner Waste Syst 3, 100036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daysal, H & Demirbaş, N (2021) Determination of consumers’ attitude and behavior on food waste prevention: The case of İzmir. Ege ÜnivZiraat Fak Derg 58, 253262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gönültaş, H, Kızılaslan, H & Kızılaslan, N (2020) Behavioral determinants of food waste; example of Tokat province. Gaziosmanpaşa Bilimsel Araştırma Dergisi 9, 1424.Google Scholar
Karakas, G (2019) Behavioral determinants of food waste; the case of Çorum province. Turk J Agric – Food Sci Technol 7, 467474.Google Scholar
Osborne, JW & Costello, AB (2004) Sample size and subject to item ratio in principal components analysis. Pract Assess Res Eval 9, 11.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2010) A Healthy Lifestyle – WHO Recommendations. https://www.who.int/europe/news-room/fact-sheets/item/a-healthy-lifestyle---who-recommendations (accessed May 2024).Google Scholar
Ammann, J, Osterwalder, O, Siegrist, M, et al. (2021) Comparison of two measures for assessing the volume of food waste in Swiss households. Resour Conserv Recycl 166, 105295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visschers, VHM, Wickli, N & Siegrist, M (2016) Sorting out food waste behaviour: a survey on the motivators and barriers of self-reported amounts of food waste in households. J Environ Psychol 45, 6678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, LL (1992) Instrument review: getting the most from a panel of experts. Appl Nurs Res 5, 194197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, HF & Rice, J (1974) Little Jiffy, Mark IV. Educ Psychol Meas 34, 111117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrestha, N (2021) Factor analysis as a tool for survey analysis. Am J Appl Math Stat 9, 411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Güngör, D (2016) Summary a guide to scale development and adaptation in psychology. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları 19, 104112.Google Scholar
Erkorkmaz, Ü, EtIkan, I, Demir, O, et al. (2013) Confirmatory factor analysis and fit indices: review. Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci 33, 210223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karakoç, FY & Dönmez, L (2014) Basic principles of scale development. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası 13, 39–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koo, TK & Li, MY (2016) A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 15, 155163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, J (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Hoek, AC, Pearson, D, James, SW, et al. (2017) Shrinking the food-print: a qualitative study into consumer perceptions, experiences and attitudes towards healthy and environmentally friendly food behaviours. Appetite 108, 117131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, H, Wikström, F, Otterbring, T, et al. (2012) Reasons for household food waste with special attention to packaging. J Clean Prod 24, 141148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondéjar-Jiménez, JA, Ferrari, G, Secondi, L, et al. (2016) From the table to waste: an exploratory study on behaviour towards food waste of Spanish and Italian youths. J Clean Prod 138, 818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Secondi, L, Principato, L & Laureti, T (2015) Household food waste behaviour in EU-27 countries: a multilevel analysis. Food Policy 56, 2540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Geffen, L, van Herpen, E & van Trijp, H (2016) Causes & Determinants of Consumers Food Waste. REFRESH Deliverable 1.1. https://eu-refresh.org/causes-determinants-consumers-food-waste.html (accessed March 2024).Google Scholar
Jörissen, J, Priefer, C & Bräutigam, KR (2015) Food waste generation at household level: results of a survey among employees of two European research centers in Italy and Germany. Sustainability 7, 26952715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganglbauer, E, Fitzpatrick, G & Comber, R (2013) Negotiating food waste: using a practice lens to inform design. ACM Trans Comput Hum Interact 20, 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, EJ, Lee, K-R & Kim, J-Y (2020) Analysis of differences in eating alone attitude of Koreans by dietary habits and age. Appetite 152, 104695.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lazell, J (2016) Consumer food waste behaviour in universities: sharing as a means of prevention. J Consum Behav 15, 430439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, D (2012) Binning, gifting and recovery: the conduits of disposal in household food consumption. Environ Plan D 30, 11231137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farr-Wharton, G, Foth, M & Choi, JHJ (2014) Identifying factors that promote consumer behaviours causing expired domestic food waste. J Consum Behav 13, 393402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Kendirli et al. supplementary material 1

Kendirli et al. supplementary material
Download Kendirli et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 21.2 KB
Supplementary material: File

Kendirli et al. supplementary material 2

Kendirli et al. supplementary material
Download Kendirli et al. supplementary material 2(File)
File 15.4 KB