Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-5jtmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-20T14:28:36.990Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of protein on abomasal secretion of acid in sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

J. Van Bruchem  and
A. Th. Van 'T Klooster
J. Van Bruchem
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Physiology, Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
A. Th. Van 'T Klooster
Affiliation:
Zootechnical Institute, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, State University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The relationship between protein content of abomasal digesta and abomasal secretion of acid was studied in sheep fitted with re-entrant cannulas in the proximal duodenum.

2. A close relationship was found between the rate of passage of protein through the abomasum and acid secretion, both after varying the protein content of the rations supplied, and after direct introduction of proteins into the abomasum (infusion tube).

3. It is concluded that proteins stimulate abomasal secretion of acid.

Information

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 44 , Issue 3 , November 1980 , pp. 307 - 312
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1980

References

REFERENCES

Ash, R. W. (1961). J. Physiol., Lond., 157, 185.Google Scholar
Ash, R. W. (1962). J. Physiol., Lond., 164, 25P.Google Scholar
Davenport, H. W. (1967). Handbook Of Physiology, Section 6: Alimentary Canal, vol.2, p. 759 [Code, C. F., editor]. Washington, DC: American Physiological Society.Google Scholar
Hill, K. J. (1955). Q. Jl exp. Physiol. 40, 32.Google Scholar
Hill, K. J. (1960). J. Physiol., Lond. 154, 115.Google Scholar
Konturek, S. J., Tasler, J., Obtulowicz, W. & Cieskowski, M. (1976). Gastroenterology 70, 66.Google Scholar
McLeay, L. M. & Titchen, D. A. (1970). J. Physiol., Lond. 206, 605.Google Scholar
McLeay, L. M. & Titchen, D. A. (1977). J. Physiol., Lond. 264,215.Google Scholar
Reynolds, G. W., Stiffe, G. E., Hansky, J. & Titchen, D. A. (1978). Proc. Aust. Physiol. Pharmac. Soc. 9,18p.Google Scholar
Saint Hilaire, S., Lavers, M. K., Kennedy, J. & Code, C. F. (1960). Gastroenterology 39, 1.Google Scholar
Ulyatt, M. J. & MacRae, J. C. (1974). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 82, 295.Google Scholar
Van Bruchem, J. (1977). Agric. Res. Rep. (versl. Landbouwk. Onderz.) 868.Google Scholar
Van Bruchem, J., De Swart, J. G. & Bangma, G. A. (1979). Ann. Rech. Vét. 10, 192.Google Scholar
Van 't Klooster, A. Th., Kemp, A., Geurink, J. A. & Rogers, P. A. M. (1972). Neth. J. agric. Sci. 20, 314.Google Scholar
Von Engelhardt, W., Ehrlein, H. J. & Hörnicke, H. (1968). Q. Jl exp. Physiol. 53, 282.Google Scholar
Von Engelhardt, W. & Hauffe, R. (1975). Zentralbl. Veterinaermed. A. 22. 363.Google Scholar