Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-hqlzj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-01T03:05:28.139Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ammonia-nitrogen turnover in the rabbit caecum and exchange with plasma urea-N

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

S. J. Forsythe  and
D. S. Parker
S. J. Forsythe
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Biochemistry and Nutrition, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU
D. S. Parker
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Biochemistry and Nutrition, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Continuous infusion and single-shot administration of 15NH4Cl into the caecum of the conscious rabbit was used to measure caecal ammonia flux.

2. Continuous infusion of 15NH4Cl and sampling from both the caecal ammonia and blood urea pools indicated that 0.27 of plasma urea-nitrogen was derived from caecal ammonia-N.

3. Values from intravenous [15N]urea and intracaecal 15NH4Cl infusions were used to produce two models of the movement of N between these two metabolic pools.

4. Further analysis of the results suggested an alternative model involving a third pool associated with the caecal mucosa and values for this model are also presented.

Information

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 54 , Issue 1 , July 1985 , pp. 285 - 292
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1985

References

Depocas, F. & DeFreitas, A. S. W. (1970). Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology 48, 557–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. & Milligan, L. P. (1984). Canadian Journal of Animal Science 64, 103–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. & Nolan, J. V. (1983). British Journal of Nutrition 50, 757–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forsythe, S. J. & Parker, D. S. (1985 a). British Journal of Nutrition 53, 183–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forsythe, S. J. & Parker, D. S. (1985 b). Journal of Applied Bacteriology 58, 363–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forsythe, S. J., Parker, D. S., Montgomery, I. & Salter, D. N. (1983). Proceedings of the IV International Symposium on Protein Metabolism. European Association for Animal Production, Publication no. 31, pp. 347–350.Google Scholar
Goulden, J. D. S. & Salter, D. N. (1979). Analyst, London 104, 756&765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, C. S. & Parker, D. S. (1978). Biochemical Journal 174, 291–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolan, J. V., Norton, B. W. & Leng, R. A. (1976). British Journal of Nutrition 35, 127–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, D. S. & McMillan, R. T. (1976). British Journal of Nutrition 35, 365–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somogyi, M. (1945). Journal of Biological Chemistry 16, 69–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weatherburn, M. W. (1967). Analytical Chemistry 39, 971–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wrong, O.M. & Vince, A. (1984). Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 43, 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar