Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-p5m67 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-24T18:09:59.790Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Differential Reinforcement of Incompatible Responses in the Reduction of Self-Injurious Behaviour: A Pilot Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2009

Robert S. P. Jones  and
L. J. V. Baker
Robert S. P. Jones
Affiliation:
University College of North Wales Trinity College, Dublin
L. J. V. Baker
Affiliation:
University College of North Wales Trinity College, Dublin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The latency of the self-injurious behaviour of a severely handicapped, Down's-syndrome boy, aged 9 years, was increased by a factor greater than three. Vibration was presented as the reinforcer in a discrete-trial, DRI-schedule procedure in which the incompatible response was physically prompted. A single-subject, ABAB design was used. It is suggested that the DRI schedule used in this way is a valuable initial procedure for decreasing self-injurious behaviour to a level where other procedures may then be applied.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , October 1988 , pp. 323 - 328
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Baumeister, A. A. and Rollings, J. P. (1976). Self-injurious behavour. in International Review of Research in Mental Retardation, Vol. 8, Ellis, N. R. (Ed.), New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Corte, H. E., Wolf, M. M. and Locke, B. J. (1971). A comparison of procedures for eliminating self-injurious behaviour of retarded adolescents. Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis 4, 201–213.Google Scholar
Frankel, F., Moss, D., Schofield, S. and Simmonds, J. Q., (1976). Case study: use of differential reinforcement to suppress self-injurious and aggressive behaviour. Psychological Reports 39, 843–849.Google Scholar
Foxen, T. and McBrien, J. (1981). Training Staff in Behavioural Methods: Trainee Workbook. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Horner, R. D. and Barton, E. S. (1980). Operant techniques in the analysis and modification of self-injurious behaviour: a review. Behaviour Research of Severe Developmental Disabilities 1, 61–91.Google Scholar
Jones, R. S. P. (1987). The relationship between stereotyped and self-injurious behaviour. British Journal of Medical Psychology 60, 287–289.Google Scholar
Jones, R. S. P., and Baker, L. J. V. (1985). The differential reinforcement of incompatible responses in the reduction of stereotyped behaviour.Paper presented at the Sixteenth Annual Conference of the Psychological Society of Ireland, Ennis, Co. Clare,Ireland.Google Scholar
Murphy, G. and Wilson, B.Self-Injurious Behaviour. Bristol: B.I.M.H. Publications.Google Scholar
Peterson, R. and Peterson, L. (1968). The use of positive reinforcement in the control of self-destructive behaviour in a retarded boy. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 6, 351–360.Google Scholar
Tarpley, H. D. and Schroeder, S. R. (1979). Comparison of DRO and DRI on rate of suppression of self-injurious behaviour. American Journal of Mental Deficiency 84, 188–194.Google Scholar
Young, J. A. and Wincze, J. P. (1974). The effects of the reinforcement of compatible and incompatible behaviours on the self-injurious and related behaviours of a profoundly retarded female adult. Behaviour Therapy 5, 614–623.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.