Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-hqlzj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-21T05:53:18.116Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

CREDIT WHERE CREDIT’S DUE: GUIDELINES ON AUTHORSHIP

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2019

F. Katharina Reichelt ,
Ian A James  and
Derek L. Milne
F. Katharina Reichelt
Affiliation:
Newcastle City Health NHS Trust, U.K.
Ian A James
Affiliation:
Newcastle City Health NHS Trust, U.K.
Derek L. Milne
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle upon Tyne, U.K.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The thorny issue of inappropriate authorship is a well recognized problem inresearch (Epstein, 1993). Recent editorials and articles in theBritish Medical Journal (BMJ), Lancet and Journal of AmericanMedical Association (JAMA) have raised its profile amongst our medicalcolleagues. The current authors feel that clinical psychologists, nursesand other mental health professionals need to be more aware of thecomplexities of the area. Hence this paper intends to clarify the majorconcerns regarding proper accreditation and gives some recommendationsand guidelines.

Keywords

Authorshippublicationsreferencingresponsibilityaccreditationcitation

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy , Volume 26 , Issue 4 , November 1998 , pp. 339 - 344
Copyright
1998 British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.