Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Hoyenga, Katharine Blick
1990.
Some of the pathological assumptions in the sciences of gender.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 13,
Issue. 1,
p.
194.
Petersen, Anne C.
Crockett, Lisa J.
and
Graber, Julia
1990.
Issues in the development of mathematical precocity.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 13,
Issue. 1,
p.
192.
Eliot, John
1990.
Spatial ability: Not enough space to make a sex difference.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 13,
Issue. 1,
p.
196.
Bouchard, Thomas J.
and
Segal, Nancy L.
1990.
Advanced mathematical reasoning ability: A behavioral genetic perspective.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 13,
Issue. 1,
p.
191.
Rushton, J. Philippe
1990.
Sex, ethnicity, and hormones.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 13,
Issue. 1,
p.
194.
Boomsma, Dorret I.
1990.
Does every smart boy have a smart sister?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 13,
Issue. 1,
p.
192.
Benbow, Camilla Persson
1990.
Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability among the intellectually talented: Further thoughts.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 13,
Issue. 1,
p.
196.
Borkowski, John G.
1990.
“Small” gender differences on the SAT: A scenario about social origins.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 13,
Issue. 1,
p.
190.
Richardson, Ken
1990.
Go back to cognitive theory.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 13,
Issue. 1,
p.
193.
Thomas, Hoben
1993.
A theory explaining sex differences in high mathematical ability has been around for some time.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 1,
p.
187.
Sherman, Julia A.
1996.
Spatial visualization and sex-related differences in mathematical problem solving.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 2,
p.
262.
Gillger, Jeffrey W.
1996.
Sex differences in mathematical abllity: Genes, environment, and evolution.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 2,
p.
255.
Foss, Jeffrey
1996.
Arithmetic and old lace.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 2,
p.
252.
Stanley, Julian C.
and
Stumpf, Heinrich
1996.
Able youths and achievement tests.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 2,
p.
263.
Newcombe, Nora
and
Baenninger, Mary Ann
1996.
Sexual-selection accounts of human characteristics: Just So Stories or scientific hypotheses?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 2,
p.
259.
Frith, Uta
and
Happé, Francesca
1996.
Mary has more: Sex differences, autism, coherence, and theory of mind.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 2,
p.
253.
Kimball, Meredith M.
1996.
Some problematic links between hunting and geometry.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 2,
p.
258.
Rowe, David C.
1996.
The twain shall meet: Uniting the analysis of sex differences and within-sex variation.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 2,
p.
262.
Proudfoot, Diane
1996.
The logic of the sociobiological model Geary-style.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 2,
p.
261.
Epstein, Herman T.
1996.
Omissions relevant to gender-linked mathematical abilities.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 2,
p.
251.