No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 April 2025
We examine the similarities and differences between Moffett's conceptualization of society and the core configuration model of social groupings. Anonymous societies correspond to the macrodeme level of coordination in the core configuration model, and recognizing that identity-based groups are defined by shared distinctiveness rather than territory encourages a more organic understanding of social groups.
Target article
What is a society? Building an interdisciplinary perspective and why that's important
Related commentaries (16)
A nation by any other name: A failure to focus on function
Definitions and cultural dynamics in understanding “societies”
Do boundaries matter so much for societies?
How an interdisciplinary study of societies can develop a comprehensive understanding of the function of deceptive behavior
Identity groups, perceived group continuity, and schism
Identity is probably too complicated to serve as a useful criterion for defining society
Psychological mechanisms for individual recognition- and anonymous-societies in humans and other animals
Societies have functions for individuals and collectives
Societies of the open ocean without territories
Societies, identities, and macrodemes
Society: An anthropological perspective
The family as the primary social group
Understanding the jaggedness in social complexity is more important
Vocalizations are ideal identity signals
What is a society in the case of multilevel societies?
Why societies are important and grow so large: Tribes, nations, and teams