No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Transitional Justice: At Multiple Cross-Roads
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 September 2025
Abstract
Transitional justice’s nature has continued to evolve and, consequently, its scope has significantly widened, raising various unsettled issues. As this review essay observes, transitional justice itself has become conceptually “transitional”, undergoing profound transitions and doing so within an also increasingly and profoundly changing context. Also, as this essay contends, the orientation of those transitions lies at the core of competing visions for transitional justice as a whole. In this vein, as this essay further argues, two major trends seem to be emerging and giving shape to transitional justice’s ongoing transitions: firstly, a trend towards focusing on the (infra)structural dimension of transitional justice processes and thus aiming to reorient transitional justice towards addressing “(infra)structural” factors of (societal) change; and, secondly, a trend towards increasingly relying on public law, in both international and internal legal orders, as a framework to conceptually articulate and implement (infra)structural processes of change.
Keywords
Information
- Type
- Notes and Comments
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Asian Society for International Law.
References
1 Cheryl LAWTHER and Luke MOFFETT, eds., Research Handbook on Transitional Justice, 2nd ed. (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2023); Daniëlla DAM-DE JONG and Britta SJÖSTEDT, eds., Research Handbook on International Law and Environmental Peacebuilding (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2023); David BILCHITZ and Raisa CACHALIA, eds., Transitional Justice, Distributive Justice, and Transformative Constitutionalism: Comparing Colombia and South Africa (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023).
2 Lawther and Moffett, supra note 1 at 9–139, 141–211, 212–380, and 382–508, respectively.
3 Dam-de Jong and Sjöstedt, supra note 1 at 17–150, 152–303, and 304–426, respectively.
4 Bilchitz and Cachalia, supra note 1 at 33–194, 195–308, and 309–468, respectively.
5 David BILCHITZ and Raisa CACHALIA, “Developing a Conceptual Framework for Global South Comparisons: Colombian and South African Contributions” in Bilchitz and Cachalia, supra note 1, 1 at 21.
6 Thomas Obel HANSEN, “The Time and Space of Transitional Justice” in Lawther and Moffett, supra note 1, 9 at 11, 16, and 21.
7 Ibid., at 24.
8 Cheryl LAWTHER and Luke MOFFETT, “Researching Transitional Justice: Editors’ Introduction” in Lawther and Moffett, supra note 1, 1 at 1, 3.
9 Maya SCHKOLNE and Hugo VAN DER MERWE, “Civil Society and Transitional Justice: Building An Expanded Vision from Below” in Lawther and Moffett, supra note 1, 158 at 158–164 and 173.
10 Catherine TURNER and Maja DAVIDOVIĆ, “Transitional Justice: An Interdisciplinary Landscape?” in Lawther and Moffett, supra note 1, 26 at 42.
11 Pablo DE GREIFF, “Foreword” in Lawther and Moffett, supra note 1, xix at xxii (warning against their “colonization”).
12 Adam KOCHANSKI, “Truth Commissions” in Lawther and Moffett, supra note 1, 246 at 248–50 and 255–61.
13 Ibid., at 249.
14 Taddeus METZ and Nathalia BAUTISTA PIZARRO, “Joint Reflection: Economic Goods and Communitarian Values” in Bilchitz and Cachalia, supra note 1, 76 at 77–9 and 81–2.
15 Nathalia BAUTISTA PIZARRO, “Building Peace and Restoring Law upon the Ethos: A Comparison Between South Africa and Colombia” in Bilchitz and Cachalia, supra note 1, 54 at 61–9 and 74–5.
16 Pádraig MCAULIFFE, “Casual and Causal Links to the Rule of Law” in Lawther and Moffett, supra note 1, 44 at 44, 50, and 59.
17 Ibid., at 54.
18 Sindiso MNISIWEEKS and Diana Carolina RIVERA-DRAGO, “Joint Reflection: The South African and Colombian ‘Peace Agreements’: Restoration of Rights or Continuing Difficulties for Indigenous Peoples?” in Bilchitz and Cachalia, supra note 1, 349 at 351–58.
19 Cynthia M HORNE, “Transitional justice: vetting and lustration” in Lawther and Moffett, supra note 1, 324 at 325–27, 330–34, and 338–40.
20 Raisa CACHALIA and Irit MILKES, “Joint Reflection: Comparative Reflections on Transitional Justice and Political Inclusion in South Africa and Colombia” in Bilchitz and Cachalia, supra note 1, 406 at 407–8, 412–13, and 416–17.
21 Raisa CACHALIA, “Exploring the Relationship Between Violent Protest and Procedural Injustice in South Africa’s Democratic Transition” in Bilchitz and Cachalia, supra note 1, 363 at 366–72 and 376–83.
22 Julián Andrés PIMIENTO ECHEVERRI and Irit MILKES, “Beyond Democracy: Meaningful Public Participation as a New Approach to Public Decision-Making in the Context of Colombia’s Transitional Justice Process” in Bilchitz and Cachalia, supra note 1, 385 at 386–90 and 401–4.
23 Ron DUDAI, “Transitional Justice, Denial and Social Control” in Lawther and Moffett, supra note 1, 110 at 112, 118.
24 Ibid., at 118.
25 Dustin N SHARP, “Transitional Justice and ‘Local’ Justice” in Lawther and Moffett, supra note 1, 60 at 62, 65, 67, 69, 72, and 75.
26 Ibid., at 73.
27 Lavinia STAN, “Transitional Justice and Religion” in Lawther and Moffett, supra note 1, 125 at 126–27, 138–39.
28 Megan L MANION and Alison DAVIDIAN, “The United Nations Aad Transitional Justice: An Enduring Human Rights Priority, Remedy to Securitization and Path to Sustainable Peace” in Lawther and Moffett, supra note 1, 141 at 141–42, 145–46, 153–54, and 156–57.
29 Daniëlla DAM-DE JONG, “The Contribution of the UN Security Council to Environmental Peacebuilding” in Dam-de Jong and Sjöstedt, supra note 1, 183 at 184–88, and 192–97.
30 Schkolne and van der Merwe, supra note 9 at 162 (focusing on civil society’s roles, notably at “global-local” developments’ intersection.)
31 Catherine O’ROURKE, “Transitional Justice and Gender” in Lawther and Moffett, supra note 1, 76 at 79–83, 89–90, 93.
32 Sarah MEAD and Marie JACOBSSON, “Integrating Gender, Peace and Environment: The Gender Dimension of Environmental Peacebuilding” in Dam-de Jong and Sjöstedt, supra note 1, 381 at 387–91 and 395–99.
33 Brandon HAMBER, Philipp SCHULZ, and Giulia MESSMER, “Transitional Justice and Masculinities” in Lawther and Moffett, supra note 1, 94 at 95–7, 101, 108–9.
34 Cheryl LAWTHER, “Transitional Justice and Constructing Victims and Victimhood” in Lawther and Moffett, supra note 1, 174 at 175–180, 183, 186, and 190.
35 Benjamin THORNE, “Witnessing and Remembering Mass Rights Violations: The Possibilities and Conditions of Becoming a Witness” in Lawther and Moffett, supra note 1, 191 at 193–95, 200–01, and 208–09.
36 Ibid., at 199 (referring to the Eichmann trial as such a space “in respect to the construction of a legal collective memory”.)
37 Joanna R QUINN, “The Psychosocial Dimensions of Transitional Justice” in Lawther and Moffett, supra note 1, 436 at 437–38 and 447–51.
38 Nancy Rocío RUEDA ESTEBAN, Emilia POTENZA, and Adriénne VAN DEN HEEVER, “Joint Reflection: Journey to a New Space: A Comparative Analysis of Museum Exhibitions Within the Context of Restorative and Transitional Justice” in Bilchitz and Cachalia, supra note 1, 181 at 186–90.
39 Adriénne VAN DEN HEEVER and Emilia POTENZA, “Journey to a New Space: The Apartheid Museum’s Truth and Reconciliation Exhibition within the Context of Restorative and Transitional Justice” in Bilchitz and Cachalia, supra note 1, 140 at 141–47 and 159–62.
40 Nancy Rocío RUEDA ESTEBAN, “Exploring Visitor Expectations and Experiences of Conflict and Transitional Justice Exhibitions in Bogotá, Colombia” in Bilchitz and Cachalia, supra note 1, 163 at 164–67 and 171–78.
41 Julia VIEBACH, Dagmar HOVESTÄDT and Ulrike LÜHE, “Transitional Justice and Archives” in Lawther and Moffett, supra note 1, 341 at 343–52 and 356–58.
42 Kim BERMAN, Michelle LEBARON, and Yolanda SIERRA LEÓN, “Joint Reflection: How Do the Arts Function in Symbolic Reparations? A Comparative Reflection Between Colombia and South Africa” in Bilchitz and Cachalia, supra note 1, 131 at 132–33 and 136–38.
43 Kim BERMAN and Michelle LEBARON, “Aesthetic Negotiation and Artefactual Agency: Key Processes for Symbolic Repair in Transitional Justice” in Bilchitz and Cachalia, supra note 1, 87 at 88–92, 100–02. and 109–10.
44 Yolanda SIERRA LEÓN, “Aesthetic Litigation as a Mechanism for Building the Truth in the Colombian Truth Commission” in Bilchitz and Cachalia, supra note 1, 111 at 115–19 and 129–30.
45 David BILCHITZ and Raisa CACHALIA, “Preface” in Bilchitz and Cachalia, supra note 1, vii at viii.
46 Meghan FINN and Andrés Mauricio GUTIÉRREZ BELTRÁN, “Joint Reflection: Litigating for a Collective: Structural Judgments and Class Actions in Colombia and South Africa” in Bilchitz and Cachalia, supra note 1, 296 at 299–304.
47 Meghan FINN, “Class Actions and the Scarce Resource of the Law” in Bilchitz and Cachalia, supra note 1, 257 at 258–60 and 270–74.
48 Andrés Mauricio GUTIÉRREZ BELTRÁN, “Forced Displacement and Social Change: Light and Shadows in the Implementation of the Judgment T-025 of 2004” in Bilchitz and Cachalia, supra note 1, 276 at 280–83, 287–88, and 294–95.
49 James GALLEN, “Transitional Justice and Non-Paradigmatic Transitions” in Lawther and Moffett, supra note 1, 382 at 383–4, 387–92, and 398.
50 Nevin T AIKEN, “Structural Violence and Transitional Justice” in Lawther and Moffett, supra note 1, 452 at 453–57, 460–61, and 469–72.
51 Colleen MURPHY and Kelebogile ZVOBGO, “Transitional Justice for Historical Injustice” in Lawther and Moffett, supra note 1, 421 at 424–26 and 428–35.
52 Hakeem O YUSUF, “Transitional Justice and Colonialism” in Lawther and Moffett, supra note 1, 405 at 411–16 and 420.
53 Peter DIXON, “Transitional Justice and Development” in Lawther and Moffett, supra note 1, 359 at 361–63, 366–71 and 377–80.
54 Taddeus METZ, “The Role of Economic Goods in National Reconciliation: Evaluating South Africa and Colombia” in Bilchitz and Cachalia, supra note 1, 33 at 35–8, 41–4, and 48–9.
55 David BILCHITZ and Magdalena Inés CORREA HENAO, “Joint Reflection: The Difference History Makes: Comparative Reflections on Socio-Economic Rights and Historical Consciousness in South Africa and Colombia” in Bilchitz and Cachalia, supra note 1, 244 at 244–45 and 255.
56 David BILCHITZ, “Does History Make a Difference? The Role of History in the Interpretation of Socio-Economic Rights in South Africa” in Bilchitz and Cachalia, supra note 1, 195 at 195–200 and 212–15.
57 Magdalena Inés CORREA HENAO, “Historical Injustice and Socio-Economic Rights in Colombian Constitutional Jurisprudence: The Case of Victims of Forced Displacement” in Bilchitz and Cachalia, supra note 1, 216 at 218–21, 230–35, and 240–43.
58 Daniëlla DAM-DE JONG and Britta SJÖSTEDT, “The International Legal Dimensions of Environmental Peacebuilding” in Dam-de Jong and Sjöstedt, supra note 1, 1 at 7–12.
59 Giulia PINZAUTI and Merryl LAWRY-WHITE, “To Repair or Not to Repair: What are the Questions?” in Dam-de Jong and Sjöstedt, supra note 1, 253 at 259–63 and 274–76.
60 Luke MOFFETT, “Reparations in Transitional Societies” in Lawther and Moffett, supra note 1, 283 at 290–91, 294–98, and 304–05.
61 Kieran MCEVOY and Anna BRYSON, “Apologies in Transitional Justice” in Lawther and Moffett, supra note 1, 306 at 307–12, 316–17, and 321–23.
62 Louise MALLINDER, “Amnesties and Transitional Justice” in Lawther and Moffett, supra note 1, 262 at 266–267, 269, 273–77, and 281–82.
63 Catherine HARWOOD, “The Contributions of International Commissions of Inquiry to Transitional Justice” in Lawther and Moffett, supra note 1, 228 at 233–37 and 244–45.
64 Anne CHARBORD and Fionnuala NÍ AOLÁIN, “Transitional Justice (Increasingly) Meets Counterterrorism” in Lawther and Moffett, supra note 1, 473 at 477–81, 484–87, and 490.
65 Onita DAS, “Sustainable Development and Environmental Peacebuilding” in Dam-de Jong and Sjöstedt, supra note 1, 17 at 23–31 and 40–1.
66 Carl BRUCH and Isabelle MORLEY, “Environmental Peacebuilding and Environmental Rule of Law: Linkages, Lessons, and Looking Forward” in Dam-de Jong and Sjöstedt, supra note 1, 105 at 106–111 and 118–24.
67 Jens IVERSON, “Managing the Tensions Between a Maximalist Approach to Environmental Protection and Anthropocentric Peacebuilding” in Dam-de Jong and Sjöstedt, supra note 1, 89 at 91–5 and 100–04.
68 Marja LEHTO, “Foreword” in Dam-de Jong and Sjöstedt, supra note 1, ix at x.
69 Britta SJÖSTEDT, “Contribution of Multilateral Environmental Agreements and their Institutional Mechanisms to Environmental Peacebuilding” in Dam-de Jong and Sjöstedt, supra note 1, 200 at 202–05, 210–12, and 217–18.
70 Virginie BARRAL, “The Contribution of Equity to Environmental Peacebuilding” in Dam-de Jong and Sjöstedt, supra note 1, 42 at 44–8 and 52–7.
71 Albert MARTINEZ and David JENSEN, “Environmental Peacebuilding and Sustaining Peace: The United Nations and integrated approaches” in Dam-de Jong and Sjöstedt, supra note 1, 152 at 154–55, 167–71, and 176–80.
72 Sonja KLINSKY, “Transitional Justice for Climate Change: Transformation through Solidarity” in Lawther and Moffett, supra note 1, 491 at 495–502, and 507–08.
73 Brianne MCGONIGLE LEYH, “Transitional Justice and International Criminal Justice” in Lawther and Moffett, supra note 1, 212 at 218–19, 221–22, and 226
74 Mispa ROUX and Natalia SILVA SANTAULARIA, “Joint Reflection: South Africa and Colombia as Transitional Justice Societies” in Bilchitz and Cachalia, supra note 1, 463 at 464–65.
75 Mispa ROUX, “South Africa and the International Criminal Court: Perpetuating the Legacy of Overlooking the Ergo Omnes Obligation to Prosecute International Crimes by Prioritising Peace” in Bilchitz and Cachalia, supra note 1, 419 at 424–29 and 433–37.
76 Natalia SILVA SANTAULARIA, “Colombia and the International Criminal Court: A Case of Positive Complementarity in Transitional Justice Contexts” in Bilchitz and Cachalia, supra note 1, 440 at 454–61.
77 Karen HULME, “Assessing the contribution of human rights actors to environmental peacebuilding” in Dam-de Jong and Sjöstedt, supra note 1, 230 at 232–37, 241 and 251–52.
78 Bas ROMBOUTS, “Environmental Peacebuilding and Indigenous Peoples’ Rights to Lands and Resources” in Dam-de Jong and Sjöstedt, supra note 1, 401 at 404–08 and 415–21.
79 Elisa MORGERA, “The Role of Fair and Equitable Benefit-Sharing in Environmental Peacebuilding” in Dam-de Jong and Sjöstedt, supra note 1, 62 at 63–72, 74–7 and 84–6.
80 Mara TIGNINO and Tadesse KEBEBEW, “Access to Water and Peacebuilding” in Dam-de Jong and Sjöstedt, supra note 1, 328 at 336–42 and 346–51.
81 Daniëlla DAM-DE JONG, “Addressing Land Inequality, Rehabilitation and Competing Uses” in Dam-de Jong and Sjöstedt, supra note 1, 304 at 305–07, 314, and 325–27.
82 Sindiso MNISIWEEKS, “Twenty-Five Years of Democracy: The Consequences of South Africa’s Post-Apartheid Constitution and Political Economy for Traditional Peoples” in Bilchitz and Cachalia, supra note 1, 309 at 314–19 and 324–27.
83 Diana Carolina RIVERA-DRAGO and Filipo Ernesto BURGOS GUZMAN, “Evaluating the Impact of the Peace Agreement on the Indigenous Peoples of Colombia: Land Rights and Compensation” in Bilchitz and Cachalia, supra note 1, 330 at 337–39, 343–45, and 347–48
84 Naomi ROHT-ARRIAZA, “Natural Resources, Transitional States and Grand Corruption” in Dam-de Jong and Sjöstedt, supra note 1, 127 at 128–31, 136–42, and 148–50.
85 Ole Kristian FAUCHALD, “Environmental Peacebuilding and Natural Resources Management: The Role of International Investment Law” in Dam-de Jong and Sjöstedt, supra note 1, 277 at 279–82 and 294–300.
86 Marco PERTILE and Sondra FACCIO, “Extractive Industry for Sustainable Development? Some Reflections on the Role of Investment Contracts in Ensuring Benefit Sharing and Community Participation in Natural Resource Governance” in Dam-de Jong and Sjöstedt, supra note 1, 355 at 363–66 and 376–78.