Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-plnhv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-08-22T04:57:32.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A mathematical analysis of wind effects on a long-jumper

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Neville de Mestre
Neville de Mestre
Affiliation:
School of Information and Computing Sciences, Bond University Qld.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A perturbation model is used to predict the distance jumped by a long-jumper for a range of tailwinds and headwinds. The zeroth-order approximation is based on gravity being the only force present, the effects of drag and lift only being included in the first-order corrections. The difference in predicted distances produced by the zeroth and first-order approximations is less than 2% for headwinds or tailwinds upto 4 ms−1. Most increases or decreases due to wind are caused by changes in the run-up speed, and consequently the take-off angle and speed.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The ANZIAM Journal , Volume 33 , Issue 1 , July 1991 , pp. 65 - 76
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1991

References

[1]Bartlett, R. M., “A biomechanical evaluation of the long jump take offs of four decathletes”, (Div. Sport, Science and Env. Stud., Crewe and Alsager Coll. of Higher Edu., 1982).Google Scholar
[2]Brearley, M. N., “The long jump at Mexico City”, Function (Monash Univ.) 3 (1979) 16–19.Google Scholar
[3]Burghes, D. N., Huntley, I. and McDonald, J., Applying Mathematics (Ellis Horwood, Chichester, UK, 1982).Google Scholar
[4]de Mestre, N., “The long jump record revisited”, J. Austral. Soc. Ser. B.28 (1986) 246–259.Google Scholar
[5]Frohlich, C., “Effect of wind and altitude on record performances in foot races, pole vault and long jump”, Amer. J. Phys. 53 (1985) 726–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Hay, J. G. and Miller, J. A. Jr, “Techniques used in the transition from approach to take off in the long jump”, Intern. J. Sport Biomech 1 (1985) 174–184.Google Scholar
[7]Krylov, I. A. and Rezimov, L. P., “Problem of the optimum ski jump”, P.M.M. 38 (1974) 765–767.Google Scholar
[8]Lafortune, M., Private communication, 1986.Google Scholar
[9]Noone, G. and Mazumdar, J., “A biomechanical study of environmental factors affecting long jump performance”, Aust. Phys. Eng. Sci. in Medicine 10 (1987) 31–38.Google ScholarPubMed
[10]Ward-Smith, A. J. and Dements, D., “Numerical evaluation of the flight mechanics and trajectory of a ski-jumper”, Acta. Appl. Math. 1 (1983) 301–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Ward-Smith, A. J., “The influence of aerodynamic and biomechanical factors on long jump performance”, J. Biomech 16 (1983) 655–658.Google Scholar
[12]Ward-Smith, A. J., “Calculation of long jump performance by numerical integration of the equations of motion”, J. Biomech. Eng. 106 (1984) 244–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Ward-Smith, A. J., “The influence on long jump performance of the aerodynamic drag experienced during the approach and aerial phases”, J. Biomech. Eng. 107 (1985) 336–340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[14]Ward-Smith, A. J., “Altitude and wind effects on long jump performance with particular reference to the world record established by Bob Beamon”, J. Sports Sci. 4 (1986) 89–99.Google Scholar