We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
Article purchase
Temporarily unavailable
References
Adkins, L. & Adkins, R.. 2009. Archaeological illustration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Connolly, P.1986. The Roman saddle. Britannia17: 353–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/526559Google Scholar
Connolly, P.1988. Tiberius Claudius Maximus the cavalryman. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Connolly, P. & van Driel-Murray, C.. 1991. The Roman cavalry saddle. Britannia22: 33–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/526629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cookson, M.B.1954. Photography for archaeologists. London: Parrish.Google Scholar
Curle, J.1911. A Roman frontier post and its people. The fort at Newstead. Glasgow: J. Maclehose.Google Scholar
von Freeden, U. & von Schnurbein, S. (ed.). 2002. Spuren der Jahrtausende: Archäologie und Geschichte in Deutschland. Stuttgart: Theiss.Google Scholar
Hattwig, D., Burgess, J., Bussert, K. & Medaille, A.. 2011. ACRL visual literacy competency standards for higher education. Association of College and Research Libraries. Available at: http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/visualliteracy (accessed 16 April 2015).Google Scholar
Hattwig, D., Bussert, K., Medaille, A. & Burgess, J.. 2013. Visual literacy standards in higher education: new opportunities for libraries and student learning. Libraries and the Academy13: 61–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/pla.2013.0008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hope-Taylor, B.1965. Archaeological draughtsmanship: principles and practice part II: ends and means. Antiquity40: 107–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003598×00032270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hope-Taylor, B.1966. Archaeological draughtsmanship: principles and practice part III: lines of communication. Antiquity41: 181–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003598×00033214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hope-Taylor, B.1977. Yeavering: an Anglo-British centre of early Northumbria. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Hopkins, C.1979. The discovery of Dura-Europos. New Haven (CT): Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hug, T.2012. Media competence and visual literacy—towards considerations beyond literacies. Social and Management Sciences20: 115–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.3311/pp.so.2012-2.06Google Scholar
Hunter, F. & Keppie, L. (ed.). 2012. A Roman frontier post and its people: Newstead 1911–2011. Edinburgh: NMSE Publishing.Google Scholar
James, S.T.1997. Drawing inferences: visual reconstructions in theory and practice, in Molyneaux, B. (ed.) The cultural life of images: visual representation in archaeology: 22–48. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
McFadyen, L.2011. Practice drawing writing object, in Ingold, T. (ed.) Redrawing anthropology: materials, movements, lines: 33–44. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Mirzoeff, N.2006. On visuality. Journal of Visual Culture5: 53–79.Google Scholar
Mirzoeff, N.2011. The right to look: a counterhistory of visuality. Durham (NC): Duke University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1470412906062285Google Scholar
Moser, S.1992. The visual language of archaeology: a case study of Neanderthals. Antiquity66: 831–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003598×0004477XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moser, S.2001. Archaeological representation: the visual conventions for constructing knowledge about the past, in Hodder, I. (ed.) Archaeological theory today: 262–83. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Moser, S.2014. Making expert knowledge through the image: connections between antiquarian and early modern scientific illustration. Isis105: 58–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/675551CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Müller, M.G.2008. Visual competence: a new paradigm for studying visuals in the social sciences? Visual Studies23: 101–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14725860802276248Google Scholar
Pauwels, L.2008. An integrated model for conceptualising visual competence in scientific research and communication. Visual Studies23: 147–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14725860802276305Google Scholar
Piggott, S.1958. The excavation of the West Kennet long barrow: 1955–1956. Antiquity32: 235–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003598×00027253Google Scholar
Moser, S.1965. Archaeological draughtsmanship: principles and practice, part I: principles and retrospect. Antiquity39: 165–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003598×00031823Google Scholar
Rostovtzeff, M.1938. Dura-Europos and its art. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Shanks, M.1997. Photography and archaeology, in Molyneaux, B. (ed.) The cultural life of images: visual representation in archaeology: 73–107. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shanks, M. & Svabo, C.. 2013. Archaeology and photography—a pragmatology, in González-Ruibal, A. (ed.) Reclaiming archaeology: beyond the tropes of modernity: 89–102. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Smiles, S. & Moser, S. (ed.). 2005. Envisioning the past: archaeology & image. Oxford: Blackwell. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470774830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, R.E.M.1922. The Segontium excavations, 1922. Part 1. Archaeologia Cambrensis77: 258–326.Google Scholar