Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-ff9ft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-04T21:14:49.510Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of wearing particulate respirators on physiological changes of healthcare workers in isolation room

Part of: APSIC 2024

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2025

Titi Sundari
Affiliation:
Sulianti Saroso Infectious Disease Hospital
Vivi Setiawaty
Affiliation:
Sulianti Saroso Infectious Disease Hospital
Nina Mariana
Affiliation:
Sulianti Saroso Infectious Disease Hospital
Aninda Dinar Widiantari
Affiliation:
Sulianti Saroso Infectious Disease Hospital
Pompini Agustina Sitompul
Affiliation:
Sulianti Saroso Infectious Disease Hospital
Hotmarida Silalahi
Affiliation:
Sulianti Saroso Infectious Disease Hospital
Tri Diani Agustuti
Affiliation:
Sulianti Saroso Infectious Disease Hospital
Yustina Melandari
Affiliation:
Sulianti Saroso Infectious Disease Hospital
Farida Murtiani
Affiliation:
Sulianti Saroso Infectious Disease Hospital
Rina Yuliaty
Affiliation:
Sulianti Saroso Infectious Disease Hospital

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Introduction: The use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for healthcare workers must be addressed, especially for procedures that generate aerosols. A standard N95, FFP2 or FFP3 particulate respirator mask is strongly recommended. WHO suggests using a particulate respirator for a maximum of six hours to avoid increasing oxygen debt, fatigue, CO2 levels, and nasal resistance. Methods: This study was observational, using a cross-sectional method conducted from February to April 2022. Participants were healthcare workers (HCWs), including doctors, nurses, and other HCWs who worked in ward of Mawar 1 Isolation Rooms. As screening, the participants underwent a Quantitative Fit Test with PortaCount® Respirator Fit Tester 8038, using particulate masks such as 3M 1870, 3M Vflex 9105, Dreamcan ME01LK, Dreamcan ME0 12.5, and RespoKare that are available in the hospital, while bending over, talking, head side to side, and head up and down. While doing the movement, the Fit Test Score had to reach ≥100. Then, we measured heart rate, oxygen saturation, and respiration rate before they entered and left the isolation rooms. Result: Thirty-one HCWs passed the screening test. One HCW could fit to more than one respirator. Sixteen (41,03%) HCWs fit to 3M Vflex 9105, 10 (25,64%) HCWs fit to Dreamcan ME01LK, 6 (15,38%)

HCWs fit to RespoKare, 4 (10,26%) fit to 3M 1870 and 3 (7,69%) fit to Dreamcan ME0 12.5. HCWs served in the isolation room for 74,0628,18 (35-150) minutes. We found a significant difference in heart and respiration rates before entering and after leaving the isolation room (p<0.05). In contradiction, the study showed no difference in O2 saturation (p=0,06).

Information

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America