8 Conacher, D.J.Euripidean Drama: Myth, Theme and Structure (Toronto 1967), 158 n. 27, talks of Sartre and ‘existentialist heroism’Google Scholar. Vellacott, P.IronicDrama:A Study of Euripides’ Method and Meaning (Cambridge 1975), 162,Google Scholar speaks of ’the morbid superstition which demands human sacrifice; a barbarity excusable in brutalized masses, but not in their leaders’. On the other hand Adkins, A.W.H.‘Basic Greek Values in Euripides’ Hecuba and Hercules Furens’. CQ 16 (1966), 198–9,Google Scholar argues strongly that the human sacrifice would have been accepted as a proper activity by the contemporary audience. Similarly, Kirkwood, G.M.‘Hecuba and Nomos’, TAPA 78 (1947), 64–5.Google Scholar It is difficult to reject their systematic arguments based on legal and philosophical documentation, but Euripides’ play also is a document of the times and the play still seems to look for a spectator’s revulsion from the savagery of the act. Abrahamson, E.L.‘Euripides’ Tragedy of Hecuba’, TAPA 83 (1952), 122,Google Scholar makes a good point: ‘Euripides has made it perfectly clear that no religious necessity is involved in the sacrifice of Polyxena. The Greeks in the assembly are about equally divided in their opinions, and are finally swayed by Odysseus’ demagogic oratory.’