Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-dbm8p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-13T23:17:11.147Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Possibilities and Limitations of the Study of the Animal Mind

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

J Van Rooijen
J Van Rooijen*
Affiliation:
Churchillweg 37-c, Wageningen, The Netherlands
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is my conviction that all animals, including invertebrates, possess a mind. This conviction is not based on scientific evidence. We are unable to observe the mind directly. According to the principle of parsimony, I assume that body and mind are two aspects of the same. This assumption predicts that it will always be possible to find a bodily explanation, implying that it will never be possible to perform an experiment that proves that a mind is present in any animal species, including human beings. As a result, it will never be possible to prove scientifically that my conviction that all animals possess a mind is correct or wrong.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 10 , Issue S1: Consciousness, Cognition and Animal Welfare: Proceedings of the UFAW Symposium, Zoological Society of London, 11-12 May 2000 , February 2001 , pp. S248 - S249
Copyright
© 2001 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Kennedy, J S 1992 The New Anthropomorphism. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Rooijen, J 1997 Suffering and well-being and the study of behaviour. In: Dol, M, Kasanmoentalib, S, Lijmbach, S, Rivas, E and Van den Bos, R (eds) Animal Consciousness and Animal Ethics: Perspectives from the Netherlands pp 114–124. Van Gorcum: Assen, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Visser, M B H and Grommers, F J 1988 Dier of Ding. Pudoc: Wageningen, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar