Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-dbm8p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-13T12:30:49.984Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

People's Willingness to Pay for Farm Animal Welfare

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

R M Bennett
R M Bennett*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Management, The University of Reading, Reading RG6 2AR, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

There has been increasing policy debate about farm animal welfare over the last 5-10 years in a number of countries, particularly concerning the need for government intervention, for example by means of legislation. Assessment of farm animal welfare policy requires some evaluation of the associated relative costs and benefits involved. When considering the benefits, it is desirable not only to collate scientific evidence about the effects of policy on the welfare of animals but, also on the extent to which citizens in society want such a policy and the benefits that they perceive to result from it. This paper describes an exploratory survey which tests the application of a technique, contingent valuation, to estimate, in money terms, the benefits that people perceive to be associated with specific measures to improve farm animal welfare through eliciting their willingness to pay for welfare legislation (a case-study relating to the banning of battery cages in egg production is used). The study shows that the methodology could provide very useful information to policy makers and others interested in public perceptions and concerns about animal welfare, and public support for animal welfare policies.

Keywords

animal welfarecontingent valuationpublic perceptionswelfare legislationwillingness-to-pay

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , February 1996 , pp. 3 - 11
Copyright
© 1996 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Arrow, K, Solow, R, Portney, P R, Learner, E E, Radner, R and Schuman, H 1993 Report of the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Panel on Contingent Valuation. January 11. Resources for the Future: Washington DC, USAGoogle Scholar
Bennett, R M (ed) 1994 Valuing Farm Animal Welfare. Proceedings of a workshop held at the University of Reading, September 1993. Occasional Paper No 3, Department of Agricultural Economics and Management, University of Reading, UKGoogle Scholar
Bennett, R M 1995 The value of farm animal welfare in society. Journal of Agricultural Economics 46(1): 46–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackorby, C and Donaldson, D 1992 Pigs and guinea pigs: a note on the ethics of animal exploitation. The Economic Journal 102: 1345–1369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carson, R T, Carson, N, Alberini, A, Flores, N and Wright, J 1993 A Bibliography of Contingent Valuation Studies and Papers. Natural Resource Damage Assessment Inc: La Jolla, USAGoogle Scholar
Council of the European Communities and Commission of the European Communities 1992 Treaty on European Union. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities: LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
Eurogroup for Animal Welfare 1992 Summary of Legislation Relative to Animal Welfare at the Levels of the European Community and the Council of Europe. 4th revision. Eurogroup for Animal Welfare: Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
European Commission and European Parliament 1989 Texts Adopted by the European Parliament 25-27.10.89. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities: LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
Gujarati, D N 1995 Basic Econometrics, 3rd edition. McGraw-Hill Inc: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Halverson, M 1991 Farm Animal Welfare: Crisis or Opportunity for Agriculture? Staff Paper P91-1, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Institute of Agriculture, Forestry and Home Economics, University of Minnesota, USAGoogle Scholar
Kanninen, B J 1993 Optimal experimental design for double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation. Land Economics 69 (2): 138–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, G and Mendl, M 1993 Why is there no simple way of measuring animal welfare? Animal Welfare 2: 301–319Google Scholar
Mclnerney, J P 1994 Animal welfare: an economic perspective. In: Bennett R M (ed) Valuing Farm Animal Welfare. Occasional Paper No 3 pp 9-15. Department of Agricultural Economics and Management, University of Reading, UKGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R C and Carson, R T 1989 Using Surveys to Value Public Goods. The Contingent Valuation Method. Resources for the Future: Washington DC, USAGoogle Scholar
Sandoe, P and Simonsen, H B 1992 Assessing animal welfare: where does science end and philosophy begin. Animal Welfare 1: 257–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar