Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-trf7k Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-06T07:10:27.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relationships between blood groups and some wool characteristics in Egyptian coarse-wool fat-tailed sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

I. F. M. Marai ,
G. M. Gebriel  and
E. I. Abou-Fandoud
I. F. M. Marai
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
G. M. Gebriel
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Agriculture, Menofeya University, Shebin El-Kom, Egypt
E. I. Abou-Fandoud
Affiliation:
Department of Sheep, Animal Production Research Institute, Ministry of Agriculture, Dokki, Egypt
Get access

Abstract

The relationships between some wool characteristics and blood group genotypes (AaAa, AbAb, AaAC, AAb, AC and AbAc) were studied in Ossimi and Rahmani Egyptian fat-tailed breeds of sheep.

Interrupted medullation and coarse wool percentages and grade of wool were significantly related to blood group genotypes (P < 0·01). Fibre length and diameter and continuous medullation percentage were significantly related to genotype (P < 0·05). Staple length, number of crimps per cm, percentages of kemp, clean wool, impurities, moisture regain and fine wool were not significantly related to blood group genotype (P > 0·05).

Keywords

blood groupssheepwool

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 55 , Issue 1 , August 1992 , pp. 123 - 127
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abou-Fandoud, E. I. 1991. Relation between blood groups and some wool characteristics in fat-tailed sheep. Ph.D. Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University, Egypt.Google Scholar
American Society for Testing and Material. 1957. Wool content of raw wool, laboratory scale. ASTM Designation 584-57.Google Scholar
American Society for Testing and Material. 1961. Staple length of grease wool. Special Technical Publication 15-5.Google Scholar
American Society for Testing and Material. 1971. Diameter of wool and other animal fibres by microprojection. ASTM Designation 1230-71.Google Scholar
Duncan, D. B. 1955. Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics 11:1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elgabbas, H. M. H. 1986. Variation and covariation in birth- coat and fleece traits of Drysdale sheep with reference to early selection and sampling positions. Ph.D. Thesis, Massey University, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Ellory, J. C. and Tucker, E. M. 1969. Stimulation of the potassium transport system in low potassium type sheep red cells by a specific antigen antibody reaction. Nature, London 222: 477–478.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fanguy, R. C, Ferguson, T. M. and Quisenberry, J. H. 1961. The blood group spectrum of a non-inbreed population as determined from cross-reactions with antisera produced in non-related populations. Poultry Science 40: 848–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gebriel, G. M., Marai, I. F. M. and Abou-Fandoud, E. I. 1989. Blood group in Egyptian fat-tailed sheep. 1. The A system. Proceedings of the third Egyptian-British conference on animal, poultry and fisheries production, Alexandria University, vol.1, pp. 477–784.Google Scholar
Jain, N. C. 1986. Schalm's veterinary hematology. 4th ed. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
MacMahon, P. R. 1937. Methods for the estimation of medullation in wool samples. journal of the Textile Institute 28: T 349–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marai, I. F. M. and Abd-El-Salam, M. 1971. [Wool technology and production.] General Organization for Books and Scientific Equipments, Cairo University.Google Scholar
Mortimer, S. I., Atkins, K. D. and Rogan, I. M. 1985. Reproductive performance of Merino strain and blood lines. Proceedings of the fifth Conference of the Australian Association of Animal Breeding and Genetics, University ofNezr South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.Google Scholar
Nguyen, T. C. 1973. Report on the sheep blood group workshop, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Jouy-en-Josas, Paris. Biochemical Genetics 4: 241–243.Google Scholar
Rasmusen, B. A. 1958. Blood groups in sheep. 1. The X-Z system. Genetics, Princeton 43: 814–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasmusen, B. A. 1960. Blood groups in sheep. 2. The B system. Genetics, Princeton 45:1405–1417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasmusen, B. A. 1966. Linkage between the C and I blood group loci in sheep. Genetics, Princeton 54: 356–356.Google Scholar
Rasmusen, B. A. and Hall, J. G. 1966. Association between potassium concentration and serological type of sheep red blood cells. Science New York 151:1551–1552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rasmusen, B. A., Stormont, C. and Suzuki, Y. 1960. Blood groups in sheep. 3. The A, C, D and M systems. Genetics, Princeton 45:1595–1603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rendal, J. 1957. Further studies on some antigenic characters of sheep blood determined by epistatic action of genes. Ada Agriculturae Scandinavica 7: 224–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryder, M. L. and Stephenson, S. K. 1968. Wool growth. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Schwartz, E. R. and Fox, R. 1947. In Matthews Textile Fibres. 5th ed. (ed. Mauersberger, H. R.), pp. 1060–1080. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. and Cochran, W. G. 1980. Statistical methods. 7th ed. Iowa State University Press, Ames, la.Google Scholar
Steel, R. G. D. and Torrie, J. H. 1960. Principles and procedures of statistics. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Tommi, M. F. 1963. Rations and allowances for farm animals. Sle. Khoz, Isdat, Moscow.Google Scholar
Tucker, E. M. 1971. Genetic variation in the sheep red blood cell. Biological Reviews 46: 341–386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Von Bergerl, W. 1976. Wooi handbook, Vol. 2. 3rd ed. Interscience Publishers, New York.Google Scholar