Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-h4f6x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-30T11:31:20.633Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Outline of the Problems of Immunogenetics and Reproduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

L. Gedda  and
M. Milani-Comparetti
L. Gedda
Affiliation:
«G. Mendel » Institute of Medical Genetics and Twin Research, Rome
M. Milani-Comparetti
Affiliation:
«G. Mendel » Institute of Medical Genetics and Twin Research, Rome

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The authors trace an outline of the problems involved in the relationship between immunogenetics an reproductive pathology, indicating the need for further specific research.

The authors formulate a “central interpretation” of several aspects of immunology, based on the role assigned by nature to primary sensitization in the protection of germinal and fetal antigens against immunological rejection. The implications of such an interpretation may be far-reaching in such fields as reproductive pathology, autoimmune diseases, anthropology and population genetics.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , January 1969 , pp. 3 - 11
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1969

References

Barker, C. F., Billingham, R. E. (1968). An artificial immunologically privileged site. Proc. 1st Int. Congr. Transpl. Soc., 25–30.Google Scholar
Behrman, S. J. (1965). Immunological aspects of fertility and infertility. In: Agents Affecting Fertility. Churchill, London, 47–60.Google Scholar
Currie, G. A., Bagshave, K. D. (1968). The antigenicity of normal and malignant trophoblast: some implications. Proc. Ist Int. Congr. Transpl. Soc., 523–530.Google Scholar
Franklin, R., Dukes, C. D. (1964). Antispermatozoal antibody and unexplained infertility. Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec, 89: 6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fudenberg, H. H. (1966). Genetically determined abnormalities in antigen-antibody interaction. Proc. 3rd Int. Congr. Hum. Genet., 233–246.Google Scholar
Gedda, L. (1968). La genetica della sterilità. Acta Genet. Med. Gemellol., 17: 543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Issit, D. P. (1965). On the incidence of second antibody populations in the sera of women who have developed anti-Rh antibodies. Transfusion, 5: 355–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katsh, S., Katsh, G. F. (1961). Antigenicity of spermatozoa. Fertil. Steril., 12: 522–537.Google Scholar
Rao, S. S., Sadri, K. K. (1959). Immunological studies with human semen and cervical mucus. Proc. 6th Int. Conf. on Planned Parenthood, 313–318.Google Scholar
Rümke, P. H., Hellinga, G. (1959). Autoantibodies against spermatozoa in sterile men. Amer. J. Clin. Path., 32: 357–363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weil, A. J., Kotsevalov, O., Wilson, L. (1956). Antigens of human seminal plasma. Proc. Soc. Exptl. Biol. Med., 92: 606–610.Google Scholar
Weil, A. J., Kotsevalov, O., Wilson, L., Rodenburg, J. M. (1960). Immunological differentiation of human testicular (spermatocele) and seminal spermatozoa. Proc. Soc. Exptl. Biol. Med., 105: 43–45.Google Scholar