Hostname: page-component-5447f9dfdb-84kf5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-29T21:15:40.094Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Jeffrey A. Segal  and
Albert D. Cover
Jeffrey A. Segal
Affiliation:
State University of New York, Stony Brook
Albert D. Cover
Affiliation:
State University of New York, Stony Brook
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is commonly assumed that Supreme Court justices' votes largely reflect their attitudes, values, or personal policy preferences. Nevertheless, this assumption has never been adequately tested with independent measures of the ideological values of justices, that is, measures not taken from their votes on the Court. Using content analytic techniques, we derive independent and reliable measures of the values of all Supreme Court justices from Earl Warren to Anthony Kennedy. These values correlate highly with the votes of the justices, providing strong support for the attitudinal model.

Information

Type
Research Notes
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 83 , Issue 2 , June 1989 , pp. 557 - 565
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Berry, William D., and Feldman, Stanley. 1985. Multiple Regression in Practice. Beverly Hills: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coombs, Clyde Hamilton. 1964. A Theory of Data. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Danelski, David. 1966. “Values As Variables in Judicial Decision-Making: Notes toward a Theory.” Vanderbilt Law Review 19:721–40.Google Scholar
Douglas, William O. 1970. Points of Rebellion. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Fazio, R. H., and Zanna, M. P.. 1981. “Direct Experience and Attitude-Behavior Consistence.” In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 14, ed. Berkowitz, Leonard. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L. 1978. “Judges' Role Orientations, Attitudes, and Decisions: An Interactive Model.” American Political Science Review 72:911–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henschel, A. M. 1971. “The Relationship between Values and Behavior: A Developmental Hypothesis.” Child Development 42:1997–2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krippendorff, Klaus. 1980. Content Analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
McGuire, William J. 1985. “Attitudes and Attitude Change.” In Handbook of Social Psychology, vol. 2, ed. Lindzey, Gardner and Aronson, Elliot, New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Murphy, Walter F. 1964. Elements of Judicial Strategy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nagel, Stuart. 1963. “Off-the-bench Judicial Attitudes.” In Judicial Decision-Making, ed. Schubert, Glendon. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Nardulli, Peter F., Flemming, Roy B., and Eisenstein, James. 1984. “Unraveling the Complexities of Decision Making in Face-to-Face Groups: A Contextual Analysis of Plea-Bargained Sentences.” American Political Science Review 78:912–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petty, Richard, and Cacioppo, John T.. 1981. Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches. Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown.Google Scholar
Pritchett, Charles Herman. 1948. The Roosevelt Court. New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puro, Steven. 1971. “The Role of the Amicus Curiae in the United States Supreme Court.” Ph.D. diss. State University of New York, Buffalo.Google Scholar
Puro, Steven. 1981. “The United States as Amicus Curiae.” In Courts, Law, and Judicial Processes, ed. Ulmer, S. Sidney. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Rohde, David, and Spaeth, Harold. 1976. Supreme Court Decision Making. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Scalia, Antonin. 1976. “Oversight and Review of Agency Decision Making.” Administrative Law Review 28:569–742.Google Scholar
Scheir, M. F., and Carver, C. S.. 1980. “Individual Differences in Self-concept and Self-processes.” In The Self in Social Psychology, ed. Wegner, Daniel M. and Vallacher, R. R.. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon. 1963. “Civilian Control and Stare Decisis.” In Judicial Decision-Making, ed. Schubert, Glendon. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon. 1965. The Judicial Mind: The Attitudes and Ideologies of Supreme Court Justices, 1946–1963. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon. 1974. The Judicial Mind Revisited: A Psychometric Analysis of Supreme Court Ideology. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Scigliano, Robert. 1971. The Supreme Court and the Presidency. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A. 1984. “Predicting Supreme Court Decisions Probabilistically: The Search and Seizure Cases (1962–1981).” American Political Science Review 78:891–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A. 1986. “Supreme Court Justices As Human Decision Makers: An Individual Level Analysis of the Search and Seizure Cases.” Journal of Politics 48:938–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A. 1988. “Amicus Curiae Briefs by the Solicitor General during the Warren and Burger Courts.” Western Political Quarterly 41:135–44.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A., Cover, Albert D., and Cameron, Charles. 1988. “The Puzzle of Roll Call Voting on Supreme Court Nominees.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, Atlanta.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Reedy, Cheryl D.. 1988. “The Supreme Court and Sex Discrimination: The Role of the Solicitor General.” Western Political Quarterly 41:553–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sjoberg, Lars. 1978. “Beliefs and Values As Attitude Components.” Presented at the International Symposium on Social Psychophysics, Mannheiem.Google Scholar
Spaeth, Harold. 1964. “The Judicial Restraint of Mr. Justice Frankfurter: Myth or Reality?” Midwest Journal of Political Science 5:165–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spaeth, Harold, and Teger, Stuart. 1982. “Activism and Restraint: A Cloak for the Justices' Policy Preferences.” In Supreme Court Activism and Restraint, ed. Halpern, Stephen C. and Lamb, Clark M.. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Tanenhaus, Joseph, Schick, Marvin, Muraskin, Matthew, and Rosen, Daniel. 1963. “The Supreme Court's Certiorari Jurisdiction: Cue Theory.” In Judicial Decision-Making, ed. Schubert, Glendon. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Tate, C. Neal. 1981. “Personal Attribute Models of Voting Behavior of U.S. Supreme Court Justices: Liberalism in Civil Liberties and Economics Decisions, 1946–1978.” American Political Science Review 75:355–67.Google Scholar
Wicker, A. W. 1969. “Attitudes versus Actions: The Relationship of Verbal and Overt Behavioral Responses to Attitude Objects.” Journal of Social Issues 25:41–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.