Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-r5d9c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-31T09:42:02.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Approval Voting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Steven J. Brams  and
Peter C. Fishburn
Steven J. Brams
Affiliation:
New York University
Peter C. Fishburn
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Approval voting is a method of voting in which voters can vote for (“approve of”) as many candidates as they wish in an election. This article analyzes properties of this method and compares it with other single-ballot nonranked voting systems. Among the theorems proved is that approval voting is the most sincere and most strategyproof of all such voting systems; in addition, it is the only system that ensures the choice of a Condorcet majority candidate if the preferences of voters are dichotomous. Its probable empirical effects would be to (1) increase voter turnout, (2) increase the likelihood of a majority winner in plurality contests and thereby both obviate the need for runoff elections and reinforce the legitimacy of first-ballot outcomes, and (3) help centrist candidates, without at the same time denying voters the opportunity to express their support for more extremist candidates. The latter effect's institutional impact may be to weaken the two-party system yet preserve middle-of-the-road public policies of which most voters approve.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 72 , Issue 3 , September 1978 , pp. 831 - 847
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Barberá, Salvador (1977a). “The Manipulability of Social Choice Mechanisms that Do Not Leave ‘Too Much’ to Chance.” Econometrica 45:1573–88.Google Scholar
Barberá, Salvador (1977b). “Manipulation of Social Decision Functions.” Journal of Economic Theory 15:266–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Duncan (1958). The Theory of Committees and Elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blin, Jean-Marie and Satterthwaite, Mark A. (1977). “On Preferences, Beliefs, and Manipulation within Voting Situations.” Econometrica 45: 881–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boehm, George A. W. (1976). “One Fervent Vote against Wintergreen.” Mimeographed.Google Scholar
Borda, Jean-Charles de (1781). “Mémoire sur les élections au scrutin.” Histoire de l'Académie Royale des Sciences.Google Scholar
Brams, Steven J. (1975). Game Theory and Politics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Brams, Steven J. (1976). “One Man, N Votes.” Mimeographed, Module in Applied Mathematics, Mathematical Association of America.Google Scholar
Brams, Steven J. (1977). “When Is It Advantageous to Cast a Negative Vote?” In Henn, R. and Moeschlin, O. (eds.), Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems: Mathematical Economics and Game Theory: Essays in Honor of Oskar Morgenstern. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 564–72.Google Scholar
Brams, Steven J. (1978a). “Comparison of Voting Systems.” Mimeographed. Instructional Module, American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Brams, Steven J. (1978b). “The Entry Problem in a Political Race.” Mimeographed.Google Scholar
Brams, Steven J. (1978c). The Presidential Election Game. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Brams, Steven J. and Fishburn, Peter C. (1978). “Runoff Elections.” Mimeographed.Google Scholar
Condorcet, Marquis de (1785). Essai sur l’application de l’analyse à la probabilité des décisions rendues à la pluralité des voix. Paris.Google Scholar
Dutta, Bhaskar, and Pattanaik, Prasanta K. (1978). “On Nicely Consistent Voting Systems.” Econometrica 46:163–70.Google Scholar
Fishburn, Peter C. (1974). “Simple Voting Systems and Majority Rule, ” Behavioral Science 19:166–76.Google Scholar
Fishburn, Peter C. (1977a). “Axioms for Approval Voting.” Mimeographed.Google Scholar
Fishburn, Peter C. (1977b). “Condorcet Social Choice Functions.” SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics 33: 469–89.Google Scholar
Fishburn, Peter C. (1977c). “Symmetric and Consistent Aggregation with Dichotomous Voting.” In Laffont, J.-J. (ed.), Aggregation and Revelation of Preference. Amsterdam: North-Holland (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Fishburn, Peter C. (1978). “A Strategic Analysis of Nonranked Voting Systems, ” SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics (forthcoming).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishburn, Peter C. and Gehrlein, William V. (1976). “An Analysis of Simple Two-stage Voting Systems, ” Behavioral Science 21:1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishburn, Peter C. and Gehrlein, William V. (1977). “An Analysis of Voting Procedures with Nonranked Voting.” Behavioral Science 22:178–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gärdenfors, Peter (1976). “Manipulation of Social Choice Functions.” Journal of Economic Theory 13:217–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbard, Allan (1973). “Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General Result.” Econometrica 41:587–601.Google Scholar
Gibbard, Allan (1977). “Manipulation of Schemes that Mix Voting with Chance.” Econometrica 45:665–81.Google Scholar
Inada, Ken-ichi (1964). “A Note on the Simple Majority Decision Rule.” Econometrica 32:525–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joslyn, Richard A. (1976). “The Impact of Decision Rules in Multi-Candidate Campaigns: The Case of the 1972 Democratic Presidential Nomination.” Public Choice 25:1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalai, Ehud and Muller, Eitan (1977). “Characterization of Domains Admitting Nondictatorial Social Welfare Functions and Nonmanipulable Voting Procedures.” Journal of Economic Theory 16:457–69.Google Scholar
Keech, William R., and Matthews, Donald R. (1976). The Party's Choice. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Kellett, John and Mott, Kenneth (1977). “Presidential Primaries: Measuring Popular Choice.” Polity 9:528–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, Jerry S. (1977). “Strategy-Proofness and Social Choice Functions without Singlevaluedness.” Econometrica 45:439–46.Google Scholar
Kiewiet, D. R. (1977). “Approval Voting: The Case of the 1968 Presidential Election.” Mimeographed, Department of Political Science, Yale University.Google Scholar
May, Kenneth O. (1952). “A Set of Independent Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Simple Majority Decision.” Econometrica 20:680–84.Google Scholar
Mazmanian, Daniel A. (1974). Third Parties in Presidential Elections. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Merrill, Samuel (1978). “Approval Voting: A ‘Best Buy’ Method for Multicandidate Elections?” Mathematics Magazine (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Pazner, Elisha A. (1978). “Individual Rationality and the Concept of Social Welfare.” Theory and Decision (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Peleg, Bezalel (1978). “Consistent Voting Systems.” Econometrica 46:153–61.Google Scholar
Rae, Douglas (1969). “Decision Rules and Individual Values in Constitutional Choice.” American Political Science Review 63:40–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riker, William H. (1976). “The Number of Political Parties: A Reexamination of Duverger's Law.” Comparative Politics 9:93–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Satterthwaite, Mark Allen (1975). “Strategy-Proofness and Arrow's Conditions: Existence and Correspondence Theorems for Voting Procedures and Social Welfare Functions.” Journal of Economic Theory 10:187–217.Google Scholar
Scammon, Richard M., and Wattenberg, Ben J. (1970). The Real Majority: An Extraordinary Examination of the American Electorate. New York: Coward, McCann.Google Scholar
Straffin, Philip D. Jr. (1977). “Majority Rule and General Decision Rules.” Theory and Decision 8:351–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stratmann, William C. (1974). “The Calculus of Rational Choice.” Public Choice 18:93–105.Google Scholar
Stratmann, William C. (1977). Personal Communication to S. J. Brams (September 21).Google Scholar
Weber, Robert James (1977a). “Comparison of Voting Systems.” Mimeographed, Department of Mathematics, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Weber, Robert James (1977b). “Multiple-Weighted Voting Systems.” Mimeographed, Department of Mathematics, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.