Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-65tv2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-19T06:42:40.682Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

When Order Affects Performance: Culture, Behavioral Spillovers, and Institutional Path Dependence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2018

JENNA BEDNAR  and
SCOTT E. PAGE
JENNA BEDNAR*
Affiliation:
University of Michigan
SCOTT E. PAGE*
Affiliation:
University of Michigan
*
Jenna Bednar is a Professor of Political Science, University of Michigan, 5700 Haven Hall, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 and a member of the External Faculty, Santa Fe Institute, 1399 Hyde Park Rd, Santa Fe, NM 87501 (jbednar@umich.edu).
Scott E. Page is the Leonid Hurwicz Collegiate Professor of Complex Systems, Political Science, and Economics, University of Michigan, 1085 S University Ave, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 and External Faculty, Santa Fe Institute, 1399 Hyde Park Rd, Santa Fe, NM 87501 (scottepage@gmail.com).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Evidence suggests that the cultural context influences the performance of laws, policies, and political institutions. Descriptive accounts reveal that outcomes and behaviors often depend on the array of historical institutions. This article presents a multi-institutional framework that can account for those findings through path-dependent behavioral spillovers. Individuals learn equilibrium behaviors when interacting in a new institutional setting. Initially, some individuals choose behaviors that align with their behaviors in similar extant institutions, creating a cultural context that can lead to inefficient outcomes. The article shows how avoiding path dependence requires sequencing (or designing) institutions to maintain behavioral diversity. Optimal sequencing thus requires positioning institutions with clear incentives early in the sequence as well as avoiding strong punishments that can stifle attempts to break established behavioral patterns.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 112 , Issue 1 , February 2018 , pp. 82 - 98
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

The authors gratefully acknowledge the hospitality of INSEAD during a sabbatical leave; suggestions from David Laitin, Tim van Zandt, and Jenna’s graduate student seminar in Institutional Analysis; audience members at the Priorat Conference on Political Institutions, INSEAD, Hamburg University, University of Pennsylvania, the Université de Génève, ETH-Zurich, the University of Michigan, the IMF, the Santa Fe Institute, Princeton University, UCLA, and the London School of Economics, as well as research support from the U.S. Army Research Laboratory and the U.S. Army Research Office under Contract/Grant No. W911NF1010379.

References

Acemoglu, Daron, and Jackson, Matthew O.. 2014. “History, Expectations, and Leadership in the Evolution of Social Norms.” Review of Economic Studies 82 (2): 423–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, Daron, Johnson, Simon, and Robinson, James A.. 2001. “The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation.” American Economic Review 91 (5): 1369–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, Daron, and Robinson, James A.. 2005. Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, and Giuliano, Paola. 2015. “Culture and Institutions.” Journal of Economic Literature 53 (4): 898–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ang, Yuen Yuen. 2016. How China Escaped the Poverty Trap. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aoki, Masahiko. 1994. “The Contingent Governance of Teams: Analysis of Institutional Complementarity.” International Economic Review 35 (3): 657–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aoki, Masahiko. 2001. Toward a Comparative Institutional Analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aoki, Masahiko. 2007. “Endogenizing Institutions and Institutional Changes.” Journal of Institutional Economics 3 (1): 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axelrod, Robert. 1997. “The Dissemination of Culture: A Model with Local Convergence and Global Polarization.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 41: 203–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bednar, Jenna. 2009. The Robust Federation: Principles of Design. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bednar, Jenna, Chen, Yan, Liu, Xiao, and Page, Scott E.. 2012. “Behavioral Spillovers and Cognitive Load in Multiple Games: An Experimental Study.” Games and Economic Behavior 74 (1): 12–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bednar, Jenna, Jones-Rooy, Andrea, and Page, Scott E.. 2015. “Choosing a Future Based on the Past: Institutions, Behavior, and Path Dependence.” European Journal of Political Economy 40 (B): 312–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bednar, Jenna, and Page, Scott E.. 2007. “Can Game(s) Theory Explain Culture? The Emergence of Cultural Behavior Within Multiple Games.” Rationality and Society 19 (1): 65–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, Sheri. 2007. “The Vain Hope for ‘Correct’ Timing.” Journal of Democracy 18 (3): 14–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boeker, Warren. 1989. “Strategic Change: The Effects Of Founding And History.” Academy of Management Journal 32 (3): 489–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boix, Carles. 2003. Democracy and Redistribution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, Robert and Richerson, Pete. 2005. The Origin and Evolution of Cultures. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, Henry E., and Collier, David. 2004. Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Camerer, Colin. 2003. Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments on Strategic Interaction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Carothers, Thomas. 2007. “The ‘Sequencing’ Fallacy.” Journal of Democracy 18 (1): 12–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cason, Tim, Savikhin, Anya, and Sheremeta, Roman. 2012. “Behavioral Spillovers in Coordination Games.” European Economic Review 56: 233–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, Russell W. 1999. Coordination Games: Complementaries and Macroeconomics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewatripont, Mathias, and Roland, Gérard. 1992. “The Virtues of Gradualism and Legitimacy in the Transition to a Market Economy.” The Economic Journal 102 (411): 291–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easterly, William 2006. The White Man’s Burden: Why the West’s Efforts to Aid the Rest Have Done So Much Ill and So Little Good. New York: Penguin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellison, Glenn. 1993. “Learning, Local Interaction, and Coordination.” Econometrica 61 (5): 1047–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falleti, Tulia G., and Lynch, Julia F.. 2009. “Context and Causal Mechanisms in Political Science.” Comparative Political Studies 42 (9): 1143–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change.” International Organizations 52 (4): 887–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelly, Sylvain, Schoenauer, Marc, Sebag, Michle, Teytaud, Olivier, Kocsis, Levente, Silver, David, and Szepesvri, Csaba. 2012. “The Grand Challenge of Computer Go: Monte Carlo Tree Search and Extensions.” Communications of the ACM 55 (3): 106–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilboa, Itzhak, and Schmeidler, David. 1995. “Case-based Decision Theory.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 110 (3): 605–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorodnichenko, Yuriy, and Roland, Gerard. 2016. “Culture, Institutions, and the Wealth of Nations.” Review of Economics and Statistics, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Greif, Avner. 1994. “Cultural Beliefs and the Organization of Society: A Historical and Theoretical Reflection on Collectivist and Individualist Societies.” Journal of Political Economy 102 (5): 912–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greif, Avner. 2006. Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greif, Avner, and Laitin, David D.. 2004. “A Theory of Endogenous Institutional Change.” American Political Science Review 98 (4): 633–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guinnane, Timothy. 1994 “A Failed Institutional Transplant: Raiffeisen’s Credit Cooperatives in Ireland, 1894–1914.” Explorations in Economic History 31 (1): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guiso, Luigi, Sapienza, Paola, and Zingales, Luigi. 2006. “Does Culture Affect Economic Outcomes?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 20 (2): 23–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrich, Joseph, Boyd, Robert, Bowles, Samuel, et al. 2001. “In Search of Homo Economicus: Behavioral Experiments in 15 Small-Scale Societies.” The American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings of the Hundred Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the American Economic 19 (2): 73–8.Google Scholar
Henrich, Joseph, Boyd, Robert, Bowles, Samuel, Gintis, Herbert, Fehr, Ernst, and Camerer, Colin, eds. 2004. Foundations of Human Sociality: Economic Experiments and Ethnographic Evidence in Fifteen Small-Scale Societies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1968. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald. 1977. The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jehiel, Philippe. 2005. “Analogy-based Expectation Equilibrium.” Journal of Economic Theory 123 (2): 81–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, James. 2014. “Models Among the Political Theorists.” American Journal of Political Science 58 (3): 547–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kandori, Michihiro, Mailath, George J., and Rob, Rafael. 1993. “Learning, Mutation, and Long Run Equilibria in Games.” Econometrica 61 (1): 29–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klemm, Konstatin, Eguluz, Victor M., Toral, Raul, and Miguel, Maxi San. 2003. “Global culture: A noise-induced transition in finite systems.” Physical Review E 67 (4): 045101–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knight, Jack, and Johnson, James. 2011. The Priority of Democracy: The Political Consequences of Pragmatism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lake, David. 2010. “The Practice and Theory of US Statebuilding.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 4 (3): 257–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linz, Juan J., and Stepan, Alfred, 1992. “Political Identities and Electoral Sequences: Spain, the Soviet Union, and Yugoslavia.” Daedalus 121: 123–39.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan J., and Stepan, Alfred, 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1959. “Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy.” American Political Science Review 53 (1): 69–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipton, David, and Sachs, Jeffrey. 1990. “Creating a Market Economy in Eastern Europe: The Case of Poland.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1990 (1): 75–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, Norton E. 1958. “The Local Community as an Ecology of Games.” American Journal of Sociology 64 (3): 251–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubell, Mark. 2013. “Governing Institutional Complexity: The Ecology of Games Framework.” Policy Studies Journal 41 (3): 537–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luebbert, Gregory. 1991. Liberalism, Fascism, or Social Democracy: Social Classes and the Political Origins of Regimes in Interwar Europe. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, James. 2001. “Beyond Correlational Analysis: Recent Innovations in Theory and Method.” Sociological Forum 16 (3): 575–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, James, and Thelen, Kathleen. 2010. “A Theory of Gradual Institutional Change.” In Explaining Institutional Change eds. Mahoney, J., Thelen, K.. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Edward D., and Snyder, Jack. 2005. Electing to Fight: Why Emerging Democracies Go to War. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nash, John. 1951. “Non-cooperative Games.” Annals of Mathematics 54: 286–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, Douglass C. 1994. “Economic Performance Through Time.” American Economic Review 84 (3): 359–68.Google Scholar
North, Douglass C. 1995. “Five Propositions about Institutional Change.” In Explaining Social Institutions, eds. Knight, J. and Sened, I.. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
North, Douglass C. 2005. Understanding the Process of Economic Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, Douglass C., and Thomas, Robert P.. 1973. The Rise of the Western World: A New Economic History. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ordeshook, Peter C., and Shvetsova, Olga. 1997. “Federalism and Constitutional Design.” Journal of Democracy 8 (1): 27–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor. 2009. Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oyserman, Daphna, and Lee, Spike W.S.. 2008. “Does Culture Influence What and How We Think? Effects of Priming Individualism and Collectivism.” Psychological Bulletin 134 (2): 311–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Page, Scott E. 2006. “Path Dependence.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 1 (1): 87–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, Scott E. 2012. “A Complexity Perspective on Institutional Design.” Politics, Philosophy and Economics 11 (1): 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 1988. “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games.” International Organization 42 (3): 427–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Robert. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. With Leonardi, Robert and Nanetti, Raffaella Y.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Roland, Gérard. 2000. Transition and Economics: Politics, Markets, and Firms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Roland, Gérard. 2002. “The Political Economy of Transition.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 16 (1): 29–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roland, Gérard. 2004. “Understanding Institutional Change: Fast-Moving and Slow-Moving Institutions.” Studies in Comparative International Development 38 (4): 109–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, Larry. 1997. Evolutionary Games and Equilibrium Selection Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Samuelson, Larry. 2001.“Analogies, Adaptations, and Anomalies.” Journal of Economic Theory 97: 320–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, Amartya. 1999. Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Swidler, Ann. 1986. “Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies.” American Sociological Review 51 (2): 273–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taagepera, Rein, and Shugart, Matthew Soberg. 1989. Seats and votes: The effects and determinants of electoral systems. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Tabellini, Guido. 2010. “Culture and Institutions: Economic Development in the Regions of Europe.” Journal of the European Economic Association 8 (4): 677–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talhelm, T., Zhang, X., Oishi, S., Shimin, C., Duan, D., Lan, X., and Kitayama, S.. 2014. “Large-Scale Psychological Differences Within China Explained by Rice Versus Wheat Agriculture.” Science 344 (6184): 603–08.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thelen, Kathleen. 1999. “Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 2: 369–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsebelis, George. 1990. Nested Games: Rational Choice in Comparative Politics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Tsebelis, George. 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermeule, Adrian. 2011. The System of the Constitution. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weingast, Barry R. 1998. “Political Stability and Civil War: Institutions, Commitment, and American Democracy,” In Bates, Robert H., et al. Analytic Narratives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.