Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-c75p9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-01T02:37:18.365Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Recognition of Short Time Periods through Seriation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Clement W. Meighan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

One aspect of the recent article by Drennan (1976) merits some additional discussion. This has to do with the units of time that can be discriminated by seriation methods. One advance claimed for the new method proposed is that it allows for time placement within 25 years or so, stated as “ … finer than most traditional seriation.” In an article published 17 years ago, I showed this degree of time discrimination, with a much simpler graphical method of seriation.

Information

Type
Comment
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 42 , Issue 4 , October 1977 , pp. 628 - 629
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Brainerd, George W. 1951 The place of chronological ordering in archaeological analysis. American Antiquity 16: 301–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drennan, Robert D. 1976 A refinement of chronological seriation using nonmetric multidimensional scaling. American Antiquity 41:290–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meighan, Clement W. 1959 A new method for the seriation of archaeological collections. American Antiquity 25: 203–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, Philip, Ford, James A., and Griffin, James B. 1951 Archaeological survey in the lower Mississippi alluvial valley. Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University, Papers 25Google Scholar
Robinson, W. S. 1951 A method for chronologically ordering archaeological deposits. American Antiquity 16: 293–301.Google Scholar