Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-p5m67 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-03T02:04:20.152Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Painted Kiva Near Winslow, Arizona

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Gordon G. Pond
Gordon G. Pond*
Affiliation:
Compton College, Compton, California
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In Ruin No. 2 of the Homolobi group near Winslow, Arizona, a square kiva was excavated in 1962. Paintings of two kachinas and a symbol were found on the west wall. White stripes were painted on the bench at one end of the room. The rest of the kiva exhibited characteristics typical of the region. Twenty bowls, two ladles, two ollas, and an arrow straightener were found inside the kiva. Some of the vessels were stacked with care in inverted positions, while others showed signs of blackening by fire after breakage. Most of the pottery is Jeddito Black-on-yellow of the Pueblo IV period.

Information

Type
Facts and Comments
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 31 , Issue 4 , April 1966 , pp. 555 - 558
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

References Cited

Colton, Harold S. and Hargrave, Lyndon L. 1937 Handbook of Northern Arizona Pottery Wares. Museum of Northern Arizona, Bulletin No. 11. Flagstaff.Google Scholar
Fewkes, J. W. 1896 Southern Extension of Prehistoric Tusayan. American Anthropologist, Vol. 9, No. 7, p. 253. Washington.Google Scholar
Fewkes, J. W. 1898 Preliminary Account of an Expedition to the Pueblo Ruins near Winslow, Arizona, in 1896. Smithsonian Institution Annual Report for 1896, pp. 517–39. Washington.Google Scholar
Fewkes, J. W. 1904 Two Summers’ Work in Pueblo Ruins. Twenty-second Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology, pp. 17–193. Washington.Google Scholar