Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-9knnw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-22T18:05:08.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Multiple Agents, and Agricultural Nonpoint-Source Water Pollution Control Policies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Rodney B.W. Smith  and
Theodore D. Tomasi
Rodney B.W. Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Minnesota
Theodore D. Tomasi
Affiliation:
ECG Consultants, Wilmington Delaware
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Assuming asymmetric information over farmer profits and zero transaction costs, prior literature has suggested that when regulating nonpoint source water pollution, a tax on management practices (inputs) can implement full-information allocations and is superior to a tax on estimated runoff. Using mechanism design theory under asymmetric information, this paper shows that under the same assumptions, management practice taxes and taxes on estimated runoff are equally efficient.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , April 1999 , pp. 37 - 43
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Buck, R.C. 1978. Advanced Calculus, 3rd edition. McGraw-Hill. New York, New York.Google Scholar
Chambers, R.G. 1989. “On the Design of Agricultural Policy Mechanisms.” Amer. J. Agri. Econ. 74: 646–54.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, P., Hammond, P., and Maskin, E. 1979. “The Implementation of Social Choice Rules: Some Results on Incentive Compatability.” Rev. Econ. Studies 46: 185–216.Google Scholar
Griffin, R., and Bromley, D. 1982. “Agricultural Runoff as a Nonpoint Externality.” Amer. J. Agri. Econ. 64: 547–52.Google Scholar
Groves, T. 1973. “Incentives in Teams.” Econometrica 41: 617–31.Google Scholar
Guesnerie, R., and Laffont, J.-J. 1984. “A Complete Solution to a Class of Principal-Agent Problems with an Application to the Control of a Self-Managed Firm.” J. Pub. Econ. 25(Dec): 329–69.Google Scholar
Laffont, J.J., and Tirole, J. 1986. “Using Cost Observation to Regulate Firms.” J. Pol. Econ. 94(June): 614–41.Google Scholar
Laffont, J.J., and Tirole, J. 1993. A Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation. MIT Press. Cambridge Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Myerson, R.B. 1979. “Incentive Compatibility and the Bargaining Problem.” Econometrica 47: 61–73.Google Scholar
Shortle, J., and Abler, D. 1994. “Incentives for Nonpoint Pollution Control.” In Dosi, C. and Tomasi, T.G. (eds), Nonpoint-Source Pollution Regulation: Issues and Analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Shortle, J., and Dunn, J. 1986. The Relative Efficiency of Agricultural Source Water Pollution Control Policies.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 67: 668–77.Google Scholar
Smith, R.B.W., and Shogren, J.F. 1999. “Voluntary Incentive Design for Endangered Species Protection.” Manuscript, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Smith, R.B.W., and Tomasi, T.G. 1995. “Transaction Costs and the Relative Efficiency of Agricultural Source Pollution Control Policies.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 20: 277–290 (December).Google Scholar