Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-kl2l2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-22T10:50:01.656Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Environmental Economic Research Has an Audience But Not a Sponsor: Discussion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Mary Jo Kealy
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

There exists no mechanism for federal agencies, national laboratories, industry, and academic institutions to set a national environmental research agenda. Moreover, funding for social science research is inadequate for providing a sound scientific basis for making environmental policy. Despite this lack of leadership, it is quite possible to define an environmental economic research agenda that could lead to improved policies for protecting and managing the environment. The present paper makes some recommendations from an insider's viewpoint.

Information

Type
Invited Presentation
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , October 1994 , pp. 120 - 124
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bingham, G., et al. “Issues in Ecosystem Valuation: Improving Information for Decision Making.” Ecological Economics (in Press), 1994.Google Scholar
Carlin, A. Environmental Investments: The Cost of a Clean Environment. a Summary. EPA-230-12-90-084 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., 1990.Google Scholar
Carnegie Commission (Carnegie Commission on Science, Technology, and Government). Environmental Research and Development: Strengthening the Federal Infrastructure. Carnegie Commission on Science, Technology, and Government, New York. 1992a. 143 pp.Google Scholar
Carnegie Commission (Carnegie Commission on Science, Technology, and Government). International Environmental Research and Assessment: Proposals for Better Organization and Decision Making. Carnegie Commission on Science, Technology, and Government, New York, 1992b. 82 pp.Google Scholar
Gramp, F.P., Teich, A.H., and Nelson, S.D. Federal Funding for Environmental R&D: A Special Report. Directorate for Science and Policy Programs, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, D.C., 1992.Google Scholar
Kealy, M.J., Grambsch, A., and Garner, D. “After the Conference.” AERE Newsletter 12, No. 2(Nov. 1992).Google Scholar
National Commission on the Environment. Choosing a Sustainable Future. The Report of the National Commission on the Environment, convened by the World Wildlife Fund. Island Press, Washington, D.C., 1993.Google Scholar
National Research Council. Research to Protect, Restore, and Manage the Environment. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1993.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Unfinished Business: A Comparative Assessment of Environmental Problems. Volume 1: Overview. EPA/230/2-87/025A-E. U.S. EPA, Washington, D.C., 1987.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Science Advisory Board (SAB). Reducing Risk: Setting Priorities and Strategies for Environmental Protection. SAB-EC-90-021. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., 1990.Google Scholar
U.S. EPA. 3. Program. (EPA/542/K-93/003). U.S. General Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1994.Google Scholar