Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-p5m67 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-29T13:13:16.345Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Economic Science and Public Policy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Katherine R. Smith
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article, research on the application of science to policy issues is reviewed and applied to economic science. Economists who want their professionally credentialed economic research to have an impact on public policy are advised to consult with policy decision-makers in framing their research questions and throughout the research process, thus assuring that the resulting findings will be relevant. A minimal degree of bias in framing, conducting, and presenting research complements a high degree of relevance for the results, allowing economic research to make a difference.

Keywords

decision-makingpolicy relevantresearch

Information

Type
Invited Papers
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 42 , Issue 1 , April 2013 , pp. 90 - 97
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bush, V. 1945. Science, the Endless Frontier: A Report to the President. OCLC 1594001, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Dilling, L. 2007. “Towards Science in Support of Decision Making: Characterizing the Supply of Carbon Cycle Science.” Environmental Science and Policy 10(1): 48–61.Google Scholar
Graffy, E. 2008. “Meeting the Challenge of Policy-relevant Science: Bridging Theory and Practice.” Public Administration Review 66(6): 1087–1100.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, S.S. 1987. “Contested Boundaries in Policy-relevant Science.” Social Studies of Science 17(2): 195–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jasanoff, S. (ed.). 2004. States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and Social Order. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Obama, Barack. 2009. “Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies” (on the subject of scientific integrity March 9, 2009). Available at www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/memorandum-heads-executive-departments-and-agencies-3-9-09 (accessed March 25, 2013).Google Scholar
Pielke, R.A. Jr. 2007. The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rittei, H., and Webber, M. 1973. “Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning.” Policy Sciences 4: 155–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarewitz, D., and Pielke, R.A. Jr. 2007. “The Neglected Heart of Science Policy: Reconciling Supply of and Demand for Science.” Environmental Science and Policy 10(1): 5–16.Google Scholar
Shaw, A. 2005. “Policy Relevant Scientific Information: The Co-production of Objectivity and Relevance in the IPPC.” Breslauer Symposium Paper 14, International and Area Studies, University of California Berkeley. Available at www.escholarship.org/uc/item/0d81p739 (accessed January 14, 2005).Google Scholar