Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-mx8w7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-31T21:26:41.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Causality Between Captive Supplies and Cash Market Prices in the U.S. Cattle Procurement Market

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

In Bae Ji  and
Chanjin Chung
In Bae Ji
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics at Oklahoma State University in Stillwater, Oklahoma, and currently a senior researcher at the Korean Rural Economic Institute in Seoul, Korea
Chanjin Chung
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics at Oklahoma State University in Stillwater
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study tests the causal direction between captive supply and cash market price in the U.S. cattle procurement market. Finding the correct causality should provide useful information to the decades-long debate on packers’ anti-competitive behavior in the U.S. cattle procurement market. It should also help researchers find better econometric specifications for the cash price-captive supply relationship. Two causality tests—the Granger test and the Modified Wald test—were conducted. Overall test results indicate that captive supply causes cash market price, and it favors the price-dependent model.

Keywords

captive supplycattle procurement marketcausalityModified Wald testunit root

Information

Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 41 , Issue 3 , December 2012 , pp. 340 - 350
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

DeJong, D.N., Nankervis, J.C., Savin, N.E., and Whiteman, C.H. 1992. “The Power Problem of Unit Root Tests in Time Series with Autoregressive Errors.” Journal of Economics 53(1/3): 323–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diebold, F.X., and Rudebusch, G.D. 1991. “On the Power of Dickey-Fuller Tests against Fractional Alternatives.” Economics Letters 35(2): 673–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domina, D.A. 2004. “Proving Anti-Competitive Conduct in the U.S. Courtroom: The Plaintiff's Argument in Pickett v. Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc.” Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization 2: Article 8.Google Scholar
Elam, E. 1992. “Cash Forward Contracting vs. Hedging of Fed Cattle, and the Impact of Cash Contracting on Cash Prices.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 17(1): 205–217.Google Scholar
Granger, C.W.J. 1969. “Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods.” Econometrica 37(3): 424–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, W.H. 2008. Econometric Analysis. New York University: Prentice-Hall Inc.Google Scholar
Hayenga, M.L., Koontz, S.R., and Schroeder, T.C. 1996. “Definition of Regional Cattle Procurement Markets.” Publication No. GIPSA-RR 96-11996, Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Konya, L. 2004. “Unit Root, Cointegration and Granger Causality Test Results for Export and Growth in OECD Countries.” International Journal of Applied Econometrics and Quantitative Studies 1(2): 67–94.Google Scholar
Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P.C.B., Schmidt, P., and Shin, Y. 1992. “Testing the Null Hypothesis of Stationarity against the Alternative of a Unit Root.” Journal of Econometrics 54(1): 159–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutkepohl, H., and Xu, F. 2009. “The Role of the Log Transformation in Forecasting Economic Variables.” CESIFO Working Paper No. 2591, Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute for Economic Research, Munich, Germany.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muth, M.K., and Wohlgenant, M.K. 1998. “Measuring the Degree of Oligopsony Power in the Beef Packing Industry in the Absence of Marketing Input Quantity Data.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 24(2): 299–312.Google Scholar
Park, M., Jin, Y., and Love, A.H. 2011. “Dynamic and Contemporaneous Causality in a Supply Chain: An Application of the U.S. Beef Industry.” Applied Economics 43(30): 4785–4801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, T.C., Jones, R., Mintert, J., and Barkely, A.P. 1993. “The Impact of Forward Contracting on Fed Cattle Prices.” Review of Agricultural Economics 15(2): 325–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeter, J.R. 2007. “Captive Supplies and Cash Market Prices for Fed Cattle: A Dynamic Rational Expectations Model of Delivery Timing.” Working Paper No. 07002, Department of Economics, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.Google Scholar
Schroeter, J.R., and Azzam, A. 2004. “Captive Supplies and Cash Market Prices for Fed Cattle: The Role of Delivery Timing Incentives.” Agribusiness 20(3): 347–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, C.R. 2006. “Proving Anti-Competitive Conduct in the U.S. Courtroom: Economic Issues with the Courts’ Opinions in Pickett v. Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc.” Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization 4(1): Article 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toda, H.Y., and Yamamoto, T. 1995. “Statistical Inference in Vector Autoregressions with Possibly Integrated Processes.” Journal of Econometrics 66(1/2): 225–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2010. “LGMN Reporter Handbook.” Agricultural Marketing Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. Available at http://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/getfile?dDocName=STELPRDC5079694 (accessed November 25, 2011).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2011. “Weekly Direct Steer and Heifer Slaughter Cattle Summary.” Agricultural Marketing Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. Available at http://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/ams.fetchTemplateData.do?startIndex=1&template=TemplateW&page=SearchLivestockSlaughterCattleWeeklySummaryReports (accessed November 25, 2011).Google Scholar
Ward, C.E. 2005. “Beef Packers’ Captive Supplies: An Upward Trend? A Pricing Edge?” Choices 20(2): 167–171.Google Scholar
Ward, C.E., Koontz, S.R., and Schroeder, T.C. 1998. “Impacts from Captive Supplies on Fed Cattle Transaction Prices.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 23(2): 494–514.Google Scholar
Ward, C.E., Schroeder, T.C., Barkley, A.P., and Koontz, S.R. 1996. “Role of Captive Supplies in Beef Packing.” Publication No. GIPSA-RR 96-3, Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Zhang, M., and Sexton, R.J. 2000. “Captive Supplies and the Cash Market Price: A Spatial Markets Approach.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 25(1): 88–108.Google Scholar