Hostname: page-component-6bb9c88b65-zjgpb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-27T16:36:54.851Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Low speed aerodynamics of canard configurations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

G. Bandyopadhyay
G. Bandyopadhyay*
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Numerical methods have been developed for the prediction of aerodynamic characteristics of canard wing configurations by considering both attached and separated flow over the canard surface; the flow over the main wing surface is always assumed to be attached. Experimental tests have been conducted in a low speed wind tunnel to compare the theoretical results predicted by the numerical methods. The comparison shows good agreement up to approximately 16° incidence.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 93 , Issue 921 , January 1989 , pp. 22 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1989 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Gloss, B. B. and McKinny, L. W. Canard Wing Interference Related to Maneuvering Aircraft at Subsonic Speeds. NASA TM X-2897, 1973.Google Scholar
2. Ray, E. J. and Henderson, W. P. Low Speed Aerodynamic Characteristics of a Highly Swept Supersonic Transport Model with Auxiliary Canard and High Lift Devices, NASA TM-X, 1694, 1974.Google Scholar
3. Vogler, R. D. Ground Effect Investigations of a STOL Air-Sea Transport Model with Blowing Over the Canard and the Wind Flaps, NASA TN D-5988, 1970.Google Scholar
4. Dollyhigh, M. S. Static Longitudinal Aerodynamic Characteristics of Close-Coupled Wing Canard Configuration of Mach Number from 1-6 to 2-86. NASA TN D-6597, 1971.Google Scholar
5. Behrbohm, H. Basic Low Speed Aerodynamics of the Short Coupled Canard Configuration of Small Aspect Ratio, SAAB TN 60, SAAB Aircraft Co., 1965.Google Scholar
6. Brown, C. E. and Michael, W. H. On Slender Wings with Leading Edge Separation. NASA TN 3430, April 1955.Google Scholar
7. Mangler, K. W. and Smith, J. H. B. A Theory of Slender Delta Wings with Leading Edge Separation. RAE TN Aero 2442, 1956.Google Scholar
8. Polhamus, E. C. A Concept of the Vortex Lift of Sharp-Edge Delta Wings Based on a Leading-Edge-Suction Analogy. NASA TN D-3767, 1966.Google Scholar
9. Johnson, F. T., Lu, P. and Tindco, E. N. An Improved Panel Method for the Solution of Three-Dimensional Leading Edge Vortex Flows. NASA Contract Report 3278, 1980.Google Scholar
10. Giesing, J. P. Lifting Surface Theory for Wing-Fuselage Combination. Report DAC - 67212, August 1968.Google Scholar
11. Bandyopadhyay, G. Theoretical and Experimental Studies of Canard Wings. Final Project Report, Aeronautics Research and Development Board, India, 1985.Google Scholar
12. Chakrabartty, S. K. and Basu, B. C. Approximate analysis of strake wings at low speeds. Technical Note, AIAA J, April 1979, 17, (4), 432–434.Google Scholar
13. Bernstein, L. Force Measurement in Short-Duration Hyper sonic Facilities, AGARD-AG-214, 1975.Google Scholar
14. Kuchemann, D. The Aerodynamic Design of Aircraft, Pergamon Press, 1978.Google Scholar
15. Stone, R. W. Jr and Polhamus, E. C. Some Effects of Shed Vortices on the Flow Fields Around Stabilizing Tail Surfaces, NATO Report No. 108.Google Scholar