Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-42vt5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-12T19:21:56.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Heat stress impacts on cows in a case study landscape measured by an integrated modelling framework

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 October 2016

M. Schönhart
M. Schönhart*
Affiliation:
Institute for Sustainable Economic Development, BOKU University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Feistmantelstrasse 4, 1180 Vienna, Austria
*
† E-mail: martin.schoenhart@boku.ac.at
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Keywords

temperature humidity indexclimate changeintegrated modellingeconomic impact

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Austrian Panel on Climate Change 2014. Österreichischer Sachstandbericht Klimawandel 2014 (AAR14). Austrian Panel on Climate Change (APCC), Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wien, Austria.Google Scholar
Fuhrer, J and Calanca, P 2012. Klimawandel beeinflusst das Tierwohl bei Milchkühen. Agrarforschung Schweiz 3, 132–139.Google Scholar
Gauly, M, Bollwein, H, Breves, G, Brügemann, K, Dänicke, S, Daş, G, Demeler, J, Hansen, H, Isselstein, J, König, S, Lohölter, M, Martinsohn, M, Meyer, U, Potthoff, M, Sanker, C, Schröder, B, Wrage, N, Meibaum, B, von Samson-Himmelstjerna, G, Stinshoff, H and Wrenzycki, C 2013. Future consequences and challenges for dairy cow production systems arising from climate change in Central Europe – a review. Animal 7, 843–859.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kipling, RP, Bannink, A, Bellocchi, G, Dalgaard, T, Fox, NJ, Hutchings, NJ, Kjeldsen, C, Lacetera, N, Sinabell, F, Topp, CFE, van Oijen, M, Virkajärvi, P and Scollan, ND 2016. Modeling European ruminant production systems: facing the challenges of climate change. Agricultural Systems 147, 24–37.Google Scholar
Kolb, C 2012. Einfluss von Klimaelementen auf Milchparameter unter Bedingungen der Vollweidehaltung von Milchkühen. Master thesis, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
Mitter, H, Kirchner, M, Schmid, E and Schönhart, M 2014. The participation of agricultural stakeholders in assessing regional vulnerability of cropland to soil water erosion in Austria. Regional Environmental Change 14, 385–400.Google Scholar
Schönhart, M and Nadeem, I 2015. Direct climate change impacts on cattle indicated by THI models. Advances in Animal Biosciences 6, 17–20.Google Scholar
Schönhart, M, Schauppenlehner, T, Kuttner, M, Kirchner, M and Schmid, E 2016. Climate change impacts on farm production, landscape appearance, and the environment: policy scenario results from an integrated field-farm-landscape model in Austria. Agricultural Systems 145, 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, F, Formayer, H and Schmid, E 2013. High resolution climate data for Austria in the period 2008–2040 from a statistical climate change model. International Journal of Climatology 33, 430–443.Google Scholar
Walter, K and Löpmeier, F-J 2010. Fütterung und Haltung von Hochleistungskühen. 5. Hochleistungskühe und Klimawandel. vTI Agriculture and Forestry Research 60, 17–34.Google Scholar
Williams, JR 1995. The EPIC model. In Computer models of watershed hydrology (ed. VP Singh), pp. 909–1000. Water Resources Publications, Colorado, USA.Google Scholar