Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-6bb9c88b65-xjl2h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-27T01:03:48.201Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Series:   Elements in Writing in the Ancient World

Hieratic

An Ancient Egyptian Cursive Script

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 July 2025

Fredrik Hagen
Fredrik Hagen
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen

Summary

Hieratic was the most widely used script in ancient Egypt, but is today relatively unknown outside Egyptology. Generally written with ink and a brush, it was the script of choice for most genres of text, in contrast to hieroglyphs which was effectively a monumental script. The surviving papyri, ostraca and writing boards attest to the central role of hieratic in Egyptian written culture, and suggest that the majority of literate people were first (and not infrequently only) trained in the cursive script. This Element traces the long history of hieratic from its decipherment in the nineteenth century back to its origins around 2500 BC, and explores its development over time, the different factors influencing its appearance, and the way it was taught and used.
Get access

Information

Type
Element
Information
Series: Elements in Writing in the Ancient World
Online ISBN: 9781009673600
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication: 14 August 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Element purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Allam, M. (2007). Die Kursivhieroglyphen: Sind sie Hieroglyphen oder Hieratisch? Zur Stellung der Kursivhieroglyphen innerhalb der ägyptischen Schriftgeschichte. Annales du Service des Antiquités de l’Égypte, 81, 33–37.Google Scholar
Allen, J. P. (2002). The Hekanakht Papyri. Publications of the Metropolitan Museum of Art Egyptian Expedition 27. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art.Google Scholar
Allen, J. P. (2015). Middle Egyptian Literature: Eight Literary Works of the Middle Kingdom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Allon, N. (2023). The Social Lives of mdw-nṯr . Hieroglyphs, 1, 193–218.Google Scholar
Andreu-Lanoë, G. & Pelegrin, J. (2018). La fabrique des ostraca en calcaire: comment scribes et dessinateurs se procuraient-ils ces supports? In Dorn, A. and Polis, S., eds., Outside the Box: Selected Papers from the Conference “Deir el-Medina and the Theban Necropolis in Contact” Liège, 27–29 October 2014. Liège: University of Liège Press, pp. 17–25.Google Scholar
Atanasiu, V. & Marthot-Santaniello, I. (2022). Legibility Enhancement of Papyri Using Color Processing and Visual Illusions: A Case Study in Critical Vision. International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition, 25, 129–160.Google Scholar
Aufrère, S. H. (2009). Les alphabets dits « égyptiens » et « cophtes » de Fournier le Jeune (1766) et la « guerre des polices » au XVIIIe Siècle. In Regen, I. and Servajean, F., eds., Verba manent. Recueil d’études dédiées à Dimitri Meeks par ses collègues et amis. Cahiers de l’ENiM 2. Montpellier: Université Paul Valéry (Montpellier III), pp. 29–49.Google Scholar
Baines, J. & Eyre, C. J. (2007). Four Notes on Literacy. In Baines, J., ed., Visual and Written Culture in Ancient Egypt. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 63–94. [Revised version of an article published in Göttinger Miszellen 61 (1983), 65–96].10.1093/oso/9780198152507.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbotin, C. (2013). Les ostraca hiératiques de l’école du Ramesseum. Memnonia, 24, 73–79.Google Scholar
Barbotin, C. (2023). Les ostraca hiératiques et hiéroglyphiques de l’ecole du Ramesséum (Habilitation, Université de Lille). Available online at https://lilloa.univ-lille.fr/handle/20.500.12210/79416.Google Scholar
Barbotin, C. & Leblanc, C. (2023). Le Ramesseum secteur sud-est (STO), l’école du temple. Description archéologique, catalogue des ostraca inscrits, catalogue des ostraca figurés. Memnonia Cahier supplémentaire 3. Cairo: Dar el-Kutub.Google Scholar
Beinlich, H. (2017). Der Mythos in seiner Landschaft – das ägyptische “Buch vom Fayum”. Band 3: Die hieratisch-demotischen Texte. Studien zu den Ritualszenen altägyptischer Tempel 11.3. Dettelbach: J. H. Röll.Google Scholar
Bell, H. I., Nock, A. D., & Thompson, H. (1933). Magical Texts from a Bilingual Papyrus in the British Museum. London: Humphrey Milford Amen House.Google Scholar
Bell, M. R. (1990). Notes on the Exterior Construction Signs from Tutankhamun’s Shrines. Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, 76, 107–124.10.1177/030751339007600109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van den Berg, H. & Donker van Heel, K. (2000). A Scribe’s Cache from the Valley of the Queens? The Palaeography of Documents from Deir el-Medina: Some Remarks. In Demarée, R. and Egberts, A., eds., Deir el-Medina in the Third Millennium AD: A Tribute to Jac. J. Janssen. Leiden: Nederlands Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten, pp. 9–49.Google Scholar
Bermeitinger, B., Gülden, S. A., & Konrad, T. (2021). How to Compute a Shape: Optical Character Recognition for Hieratic. In Zamacona, C. G. und Ortiz-García, J., eds., Handbook of Digital Egyptology. Texts. Monografías Del Oriente Antiguo 1. Alcalá de Henares: Editorial Universidad de Alcalá, pp. 121–138.Google Scholar
Bickel, S. & Mathieu, B. (1993). L’écrivain Amennakht et son Enseignement. Bulletin de l’institut français d’archéologie orientale, 93, 31–51.Google Scholar
Blackman, A. M. (1932). Middle Egyptian Stories. Bibliotheca Aegyptiaca 2. Brussels: Fondation Égyptologique Reine Élisabeth.Google Scholar
Blackman, A. M. (1988). The Story of King Kheops and the Magicians. Edited for publication by W. V. Davies. Reading: J. V. Books.Google Scholar
Blasco Torres, A. I. (2015). Les ostraca de Narmouthis dans le contexte du bilinguisme gréco-égyptien de l’époque romaine. In Brun-Rigaud, G., ed., Contacts, conflits, et créations linguistiques. Paris: Éditions du Comtié des travaux historiques et scientifiques, pp. 11–18.Google Scholar
Von Bomhard, A. S. (1999). Le conte du Naufragé et le Papyrus Prisse. Revue d́Égyptologie, 50, 51–65.Google Scholar
Borchardt, L. (1907). Das Dienstgebäude des Auswärtigen Amtes unter den Ramessiden. Zeitschrift für ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde, 44, 59–61.Google Scholar
Boud’hors, A., et al. (2021). Les dépotoirs à tessons de Hout-Répit/Athribis et leur matériel inscrit. Rapport préliminaire (mission 2019–2020). Bulletin de l’Institut français d’archéologie orientale, 121, 69–145.Google Scholar
Brawanski, A. (2019). Die Schreiber des Papyrus Edwin Smith. In Brose, M. et al. eds., En détail: Philologie und Archäologie im Diskurs: Festschrift für Hans-Werner Fischer-Elfert. Zeitschrift für Ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde Beiheft 7. Berlin: De Gruyte, pp. 151–174.Google Scholar
Brunner, H. (1957). Altägyptische Erziehung, 2nd ed. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Buchwald, J. Z. & Josefowicz, D. G. (2022). The Riddle of the Rosetta. How an English Polymath and a French Polyglot Discovered the Meaning of Egyptian Hieroglyphs. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bülow-Jacobsen, A. (2008). Infra-red Photography of Ostraca and Papyri. Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 165, 175–185.Google Scholar
Bülow-Jacobsen, A. (2020). Photography of Papyri and Ostraca. In Caputo, C. and Lougovaya, J., eds., Using Ostraca in the Ancient World: New Discoveries and Methodologies. Materiale Textkulturen 32. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 59–86.Google Scholar
Burkard, G. (2013). Amunnakht, Scribe and Poet of Deir el-Medina: A Study of Ostracon O Berlin P 14262. In Enmarch, R. and Lepper, V., eds., Ancient Egyptian Literature: Theory and Practice. Proceedings of the British Academy 188. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 65–82.Google Scholar
Burkard, G., Goecke-Bauer, M., & Wimmer, S. (2002). Editing Hieratic Ostraca: Some Remarks for the New Centennium. In Eldamaty, M. and Trad, M., eds., Egyptian Museum Collections around the World: Studies for the Centennial of the Egyptian Museum, Cairo. Vol. 1. Cairo: American University in Cairo Press, pp. 197–206.Google Scholar
Caminos, R. A. (1954). Late-Egyptian Miscellanies. Brown Egyptological Studies I. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Caputo, C. (2019). Looking at the Material: One Hundred Years of Studying Ostraca from Egypt. In Ritter-Schmalz, C. and Schwitter, R., eds., Antike Texte und ihre Materialität: Alltägliche Präsenz, mediale Semantik, literarische Reflexion. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, pp. 93–118.Google Scholar
Cavallo, G. (2011). Greek and Latin Writing in the Papyri. In Bagnall, R. S., ed., The Oxford Handbook of Papyrology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 101–148.Google Scholar
Černý, J. (1952). Paper & Books in Ancient Egypt: An Inaugural Lecture Delivered at University College, 29 May 1947. London: H. K. Lewis.Google Scholar
Černý, J. (1976). Coptic Etymological Dictionary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chantrain, G. (2014). The Use of Classifiers in the New Kingdom. A Global Reorganization of the Classifiers System? Lingua Aegyptiae, 22, 39–59.Google Scholar
Chantrain, G. (2021). Classification Strategies from the End of the Ramesside Period until the Late Period: A Living System. Zeitschrift für Ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde, 148, 50–64.10.1515/zaes-2021-0108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cherpion, N. (2012). Le Dessinateur Cherubini et la Grammaire de Champollion. Bibliothèque Générale 43. Cairo: Institut français d’archéologie orientale.Google Scholar
Christiansen, T. (2017). Manufacture of Black Ink in the Ancient Mediterranean. Bulletin of the American Society of Papyrologists, 54, 167–195.Google Scholar
Christiansen, T. et al. (2017). Chemical Characterization of Black and Red Inks Inscribed on Ancient Egyptian Papyri: The Tebtunis Temple Library. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 14, 208–219.Google Scholar
Christiansen, T. et al. (2020). Insights into the Composition of Ancient Egyptian Red and Black Inks on Papyri Achieved by Synchrotron-based Microanalyses. PNAS, 117(45), 27825–27835.10.1073/pnas.2004534117CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collombert, Ph. (2023). The Hieroglyphic Repertoire. In Polis, S., ed., Guide to the Writing Systems of Ancient Egypt. Cairo: Institut français d’archéologie orientale, pp. 126–132.Google Scholar
Cribiore, R. (2015). Literary Culture and Education in the Dakhla Oasis. In Bagnall, R. S. et al., eds., An Oasis City. New York: New York University Press, pp. 179–192.Google Scholar
Darnell, J. C. (2013). The Rock Shrine of Pahu, Gebel Akhenaton, and Other Rock Inscriptions from the Western Hinterland of Qamula. Vol. II of Theban Desert Road Survey. Yale Egyptological Publications 1. Yale: Yale Egyptological Institute.Google Scholar
Darnell, J. C. & Darnell, D. (2002). Gebel Tjauti Rock Inscriptions 1–45 and Wadi el-Hôl Rock Inscriptions 1–45. Vol. I of Theban Desert Road Survey in the Egyptian Western Desert. Oriental Institute Publications 119. Chicago: Oriental Institute.Google Scholar
Davies, N. de G. (1943). The Tomb of Rekhmire at Thebes, 2 vols. The Metropolitan Museum of Art Egyptian Expedition 11. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art.Google Scholar
Demarée, R. J. (with contributions by B. Leach and P. Usick). (2006). The Bankes Late Ramesside Papyri. London: British Museum Research Publication, 155.Google Scholar
Demarée, R. J. (2018). Some Notes on the Handwriting of the Scribe of the Tomb Dhutmose. In Gülden, S. A., Van Der Moezel, K., and Verhoeven, U., eds., Ägyptologische “Binsen”-Weisheiten III. Formen und Funktionen von Zeichenliste und Paläographie. Akten der internationalen und interdisziplinären Tagung in der Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur, Mainz im April 2016. Einzelveröffentlichungen 15. Mainz: Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur/Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, pp. 267–280.Google Scholar
Den Doncker, A. (2019). Réactions aux images. Pour une réception des images en Égypte ancienne. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Leiden.Google Scholar
Den Doncker, A. (2023). Inscribing Objects. In Polis, S., ed., Guide to the Writing Systems of Ancient Egypt. Cairo: Institut français d’archéologie orientale, pp. 234–239.Google Scholar
Díaz-Iglesias Llanos, L. (2022). Hieratic Signs in a Cursive Hieroglyphic Text: The Case of the Burial Chamber of the Tomb of Djehuty (TT 11) with Additions of Other Contemporary Examples. In Gülden, S. A., Konrad, T., and Verhoeven, U., eds., Ägyptologische “Binsen”-Weisheiten IV: Hieratisch des Neuen Reiches: Akteure, Formen und Funktionen. Akten der internationalen Tagung in der Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur, Mainz im Dezember 2019. Mainz: Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur, pp. 127–154.Google Scholar
Díaz-Iglesias Llanos, L. (2023). Linear Hieroglyphs. In Stauder, A. and Wendrich, W., eds., UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology. Los Angeles. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2kz858gv.Google Scholar
Díaz-Iglesias Llanos, L. & Méndez-Rodríguez, D. M. (2023). Epigraphic Study of the Burial Chamber Belonging to Nakhtmin (TT 87): Materiality and Scribal Hands. Journal of Near Easter Studies, 82, 1–42.Google Scholar
Dieleman, J. (2005). Priests, Tongues, and Rites: The London-Leiden Magical Manuscripts and Translation in Egyptian Ritual (100–300 ce). Religions in the Graeco-Roman World, 153. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789047406747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donnat Beauquier, S. (2014). Écrire à ses morts: Enquête sur un usage rituel de l’écrit dans l’Égypte pharaonique. Grenoble: Jérôme Millon.Google Scholar
Donker van Heel, K. (2020). Some Issues in and Perhaps a New Methodology for Abnormal Hieratic. In Davies, V. and Laboury, D., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Egyptian Epigraphy and Palaeography. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 590–604.Google Scholar
Donker van Heel, K. & Haring, B. (2003). Writing in a Workmen’s Village: Scribal Practice in Ramesside Deir el-Medina. Egyptologische Uitgaven 16. Leiden: Nederlands Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten.Google Scholar
Dorn, A. (2013). Kulturelle Topografie literarischer Texte. Versuch einer Funktions- und Bedeutungsbestimmung literarischer Texte im Mittleren Reich anhand ihrer archäeologischen Kontexte. In Moers, G. et al., eds., Dating Egyptian Literary Texts. Lingua Aegyptia Studia Monographica 11. Hamburg: Widmaier Verlag, pp. 73–109.Google Scholar
Dorn, A. (2015). Diachrone Veränderungen der Handschrift des Nekropolenschreibers Amunnacht, Sohn des Ipui. In Verhoeven, U., ed., Ägyptologische “Binsen”-Weisheiten I–II. Neue Forschungen und Methoden der Hieratistik. Akten zweier Tagungen in Mainz im April 2011 und März 2013. Einzelveröffentlichungen 14. Mainz: Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur/Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, pp. 175–218.Google Scholar
Dorn, A. (2022). Dating of literary ostraca with the Hieratische Paläographie der nicht-literarischen Ostraka der 19. und 20. Dynastie by Stefan Wimmer – an experiment. In Gülden, S., Konrad, T., and Verhoeven, U., eds., Ägyptologische “Binsen”-Weisheiten IV. Abhandlungen der Geistes- und sozialwissenschaftliche Klasse 17. Mainz: Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur, pp. 155–383.Google Scholar
Dorn, A. (2023). Graffiti in Western Thebes Left by the Members of the Community of Workmen and Others: Past Research, Future Perspectives and a Recently Identified Eighteenth Dynasty Graffito. In Davies, B. G., ed., Dispatches from Deir el-Medina. Liverpool: Abercromby Press, pp. 91–108.Google Scholar
Dorn, A. & Polis, S. (2017). Nouveaux textes littéraires du scribe Amennakhte (et autres ostraca relatifs au scribe de la Tombe). Bulletin de l’Institut français d’archéologie orientale, 116, 57–96.Google Scholar
Dorn, A. & Polis, S. (2019). Le scribe de la Tombe Amennakhte: deux nouveau documents remarquables dans le fonds de l’Ifao. In Albert, F. and Gasse, A., eds., Études de documents hiératiques inédits – Travaux de la première Académie hiératiques. Bibliothèque générale 56 / CENiM 22. Cairo: Institut français d’archéologie orientale, pp. 15–35.Google Scholar
Dorn, A. & Polis, S. (2022). The Hymn to Ptah as a Demiurgic and Fertility God on O. Turin CGT 57002: Contextualising an Autograph by Amennakhte Son of Ipuy. In Töpfer, S., del Vesco, P., and Poole, F., eds., Deir el-Medina: Through the Kaleidoscope. Turin: Museo Egizio, pp. 424–450.Google Scholar
Edel, E. (1980). Die Felsgräbernekropole der Qubbet el Hawa bei Assuan, II. Abteilung: Die althieratischen Topfaufschriften. Paläographie der althieratischen Gefässaufschriften aus den Grabungsjahren 1960 bis 1973. Abhandlungen der Rheinisch-Westfälischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 66. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
El-Shahawy, A. (2010). Recherche sur la décoration des tombes thébaines du Nouvel Empire. Internet-Beiträge zur Ägyptologie und Sudanarchäologie XIII. London: Golden House Publications.Google Scholar
Enmarch, R. (2013). Some Literary Aspects of the Kamose Inscriptions. Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, 99, 253–263.10.1177/030751331309900112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enmarch, R. (2020). Paratextual Signs in Egyptian Texts of the Old and Middle Kingdoms. In Carlig, N. et al., eds., Signes dans les textes: Continuités et ruptures des pratiques scribales en Égypte pharaonique, gréco-romaine et byzantine. Papyrologica Leodiensia 9. Liège: Presses Universitaires de Liège, pp. 41–56.Google Scholar
Erman, A. (1890). Die Märchen des Papyrus Westcar, 2 vols. Berlin: W. Spemann.Google Scholar
Erman, A. (1903). Zur Erklärung des Papyrus Harris. Sitzungsberichte der Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 21, 456–474.Google Scholar
Eyre, C. J. (2013). The Use of Documents in Ancient Egypt. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Faulkner, R. O. (1935). Some Further Remarks on the Transcription of Late Hieratic. Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, 21, 49–51.10.2307/3854490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Firth, C. M. & Gunn, B. (1926). Excavations at Saqqara: Teti Pyramid Cemeteries, 2 vols. Cairo: Institut français d’archéologie orientale.Google Scholar
Fischer-Elfert, H.-W. (1986). Die Satirische Streitschrift des Papyrus Anastasi I: Übersetzung und Kommentar. Ägyptologische Abhandlungen 44. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Fischer-Elfert, H.-W. (2020). Hieratic Palaeography in Literary and Documentary Texts from Deir el-Medina. In Davies, V. and Laboury, D., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Egyptian Epigraphy and Palaeography. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 647–662.Google Scholar
Fischer-Elfert, H.-W. (2021). Grundzüge einer Geschichte des Hieratischen, 2 vols. Einführungen und Quellentexte zur Ägyptologie 14. Berlin: LIT Verlag.Google Scholar
Franke, D. (2013). Egyptian Stelae in the British Museum from the 13th to 17th Dynasties. Edited by Marée, M.. London: British Museum Press.Google Scholar
Frood, E. (2007). Biographical Texts from Ramesside Egypt. Writings from the Ancient World 26. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature.Google Scholar
Galán, J. M. (2007). An Apprentice’s Board from Dra Abu el-Naga. Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, 93, 95–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallo, P. (1997). Ostraca demotici e ieratici dall’archivio bilingue di Narmouthis II. Pisa: Edizioni ETS.Google Scholar
Gardiner, A. H. (1916). The Defeat of the Hyksos by Kamose: The Carnarvon Tablet, No. I. Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, 13, 95–110.Google Scholar
Gardiner, A. H. (1929). The Transcription of New Kingdom Hieratic. Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, 15, 48–55.10.1177/030751332901500106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardiner, A. H. (1932). Late-Egyptian Stories. Bibliotheca Aegyptiaca 1. Brussels: Fondation Égyptologique Reine Élisabeth.Google Scholar
Gardiner, A. H. (1941). Ramesside Texts Relating to the Taxation and Transport of Corn. Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, 27, 19–73.10.1177/030751334102700105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardiner, A. H. & Černý, J. (1957). Hieratic Ostraca. Vol. 1. Oxford: Griffith Institute.Google Scholar
Gasse, A. (1988). Données nouvelles administratives et sacerdotales sur l’organisation du domaine d’Amon XXe-XXIe dynasties à la lumiére des papyrus Prachov, Reinhardt et Grundbuch (avec éditio princeps des papyrus Louvre AF 6345 et 6346–7). Bibliothèque d’Étude 104, 2 vols. Cairo: Institut français d’archéologie orientale.Google Scholar
Gasse, A. (1992). Les ostraca hiératiques littéraires de Deir el-Medina: nouvelles orientations de la publication. In Demarée, R. J. and Egberts, A., eds., Village Voices: Proceedings of the Symposium “Texts from Deir el-Medîna and their interpretation,” Leiden, May 31–June 1. Leiden: Centre of Non-Western Studies, pp. 51–70.Google Scholar
Gasse, A. (2000). Le K2, un cas d’école? In Demarée, R. J. and Egberts, A., eds., Deir el-Medina in the Third Millenium AD: A Tribute to Jac. J. Janssen. Egyptologische Uitgaven 14. Leiden: Nederlands Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten, pp. 109–120.Google Scholar
Gasse, A. (2005). Catalogue des ostraca littéraires de Deir al-Médîna, V, Nos 1775–1873 et 1156. Documents de fouilles de l’Institut français d’archéologie orientale 44. Cairo: Institut français d’archéologie orientale.Google Scholar
Gasse, A. (2016). Une caverne d’Ali Baba, la documentation hiératique des anciens Égyptiens. In Bazin Rizzo, L., Gasse, A., and Servajean, F., eds., À lʼécole des scribes: Les écritures de l’Égypte Ancienne. Les Cahiers Égypte Nilotique et Méditérranéenne 15. Montpellier: Silvana Editoriale, pp. 61–71.Google Scholar
Gasse, A. (2018). Les ligatures dans les textes hiératiques du Nouvel Empire (à partir des ostraca): Entre pragmatisme et maniérisme. In Gülden, S. A., Van Der Moezel, K., and Verhoeven, U., eds., Ägyptologische “Binsen”-Weisheiten III. Formen und Funktionen von Zeichenliste und Paläographie. Akten der internationalen und interdisziplinären Tagung in der Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur, Mainz im April 2016. Einzelveröffentlichungen 15. Mainz: Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur/Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, pp. 111–133.Google Scholar
Geoga, M. (2021). New Insights into Papyrus Millingen and the Reception History of The Teaching of Amenemhat. Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, 107, 225–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geoga, M. (2022). Between Literature and History: Receptions of Poetry in Ancient Egypt. Middle Eastern Literatures, 25(2–3), 69–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goedicke, H. (1988). Old Hieratic Palaeography. Baltimore: Halgo.Google Scholar
Golénischeff, W. (1913). Les papyrus hiératiques nos. 1115, 1116A et 1116B de l’Ermitage Impérial à St. Petersbourg. Leipzig: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Gozzoli, R. (2013). Hieroglyphic Text Processors, Manuel de Codage, Unicode, and Lexicography. In Polis, S. and Winand, J., eds., Texts, Languages & Information Technology in Egyptology. Aegyptiaca Leodensia 9. Liège: Presses Universitaires de Liège, pp. 89–101.Google Scholar
Graefe, E. (2015). Über den parallelen Gebrauch von hieroglyphischen, kursivhieroglyphischen und hieratischen Schriftzeichen in Totentexten. In Verhoeven, U., ed., Ägyptologische “Binsen”-Weisheiten I–II. Neue Forschungen und Methoden der Hieratistik. Akten zweier Tagungen in Mainz im April 2011 und März 2013 (Einzelveröffentlichungen 14). Mainz: Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur/Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, pp. 119–142.Google Scholar
Grandet, P. (1994). Le Papyrus Harris I, 2 vols. Bibliothèque d’étude 109(1–2). Cairo: Institut français d’archéologie orientale.Google Scholar
Grandet, P. (2000). Catalogue des ostraca hièratiques non littéraires de Deîr el-Médînéh VIII, Nos. 706-830. Documents de fouilles de l’Institut français d’archéologie orientale 39. Cairo: Institut français d’archéologie orientale.Google Scholar
Grandet, P. (2023). Hieratic. In Polis, S., ed., Guide to the Writing Systems of Ancient Egypt. Cairo: Institut français d’archéologie orientale, pp. 62–69.Google Scholar
Grenfell, B. P., Hunt, A. S., & Goodspeed, E. J. (1907). The Tebtunis Papyri, Part II. Greco-Roman Memoirs 52. London: Egypt Exploration Society.Google Scholar
Griffith, F. Ll. & Petrie, W. M. F. (1889). Two Hieroglyphic Papyri from Tanis. London: Trübner & Co.Google Scholar
Gülden, S. A. (2016). Ein “nouveau Möller”? Grenzen und Möglichkeiten. Ein working paper zum gleichnamigen Vortrag. Hieratic Studies Online 1. Available online at https://aku.uni-mainz.de/hieratic-studies-online/.Google Scholar
Gülden, S. A. (2023a). Binsen, Bytes und Backups – Betrachtungen zum (Forschungs-) Datenmanagement im AKU-Projekt. In Gerhards, S. et al., eds., Schöne Denkmäler sind entstanden. Studien zu Ehren von Ursula Verhoeven. Heidelberg: Propylaeum, pp. 133–150.Google Scholar
Gülden, S. A. (2023b). Studying Hieratic and Cursive Hieroglyphs in a Digital Age. In El-Aguizy, O. and Kasparian, B., eds., Proceedings of the Twelfth International Congress of Egyptologists, 3rd–8th November 2019, Cairo. Bibliothèque Générale 71. Cairo: Institut français d’archéologie orientale, pp. 761–768.Google Scholar
Gülden, S. A., Krause, C., & Verhoeven, U. (2020). Digital Palaeography of Hieratic. In Davies, V. and Laboury, D., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Egyptian Epigraphy and Palaeography. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 634–646.Google Scholar
Habachi, L. 1972. The Second Stela of Kamose and His Struggle Against the Hyksos Ruler and his Capital. Abhandlungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts Kairo 8. Glückstadt: J. J. Augustin.Google Scholar
Hagen, F. (2011). The Hieratic Dockets on the Cuneiform Tablets from Amarna. Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, 97, 214–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagen, F. (2012). An Ancient Egyptian Literary Text in Context: The Instruction of Ptahhotep. Orientalia Lovaniensia Analecta 218. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Hagen, F. (2013). An Eighteenth Dynasty Writing Board (Ashmolean 1948.91) and the Hymn to the Nile. Journal of the American Research Center in Egypt, 49, 73–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagen, F. (2016). On Some Movements of the Royal Court in New Kingdom Egypt. In van Dijk, J., ed., Another Mouthful of Dust: Egyptological Studies in Honour of Geoffrey Thorndike Martin. Orientalia Lovaniensia Analecta 246. Leuven: Peeters, pp. 155–182.Google Scholar
Hagen, F. (with a contribution by D. Soliman). (2018). Archives in Ancient Egypt, 2500–1000 bce. In Bausi, A. et al., eds., Manuscripts and Archives: Comparative Views on Record-Keeping. Studies in Manuscript Cultures 11. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, pp. 71–170.Google Scholar
Hagen, F. (2019a). New Copies of Old Classics: Early Manuscripts of Khakheperreseneb and The Instruction of a Man for His Son. Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, 105, 177–208.10.1177/0307513319889326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagen, F. (2019b). Libraries in Ancient Egypt, 1500–1000 bc. In Ryholt, K. and Barjamovic, G., eds., Libraries before Alexandria: Ancient Near Eastern Traditions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 244–318.Google Scholar
Hagen, F. (2021). Ostraca from the Temple of a Million Years of Thutmose III. Culture and History of the Ancient Near East 120. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004447561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagen, F. (2024). The Hieratic Material from the Temple of a Million Years of Thutmose III: A Preliminary Report. In Seco Álvarez, M. and Martínez Babón, J., eds., A Place of Worship and Burial: The Site of the Temple of Millions of Years of Thutmose III in Thebes. Sevilla: Editorial Universidad de Sevilla, pp. 171–202.Google Scholar
Hagen, F. & Ryholt, K. (2016). The Antiquities Trade in Egypt 1880–1930: The H. O. Lange Papers. Scientia Danica. Series H. Humanistica, 4. Vol. 8. Copenhagen: Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab.Google Scholar
Haliassos, A. et al. (2020). Classification and Detection of Symbols in Ancient Papyri. In Liarokapis, F. et al., eds., Visual Computing for Cultural Heritage. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 121–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37191-3_7.Google Scholar
Haring, B. (1997). Divine Households: Administrative and Economic Aspects of the New Kingdom Royal Memorial Temples in Western Thebes. Egyptologische Uitgaven 12. Leiden: Nederlands Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten.Google Scholar
Haring, B. (2015). Hieratic Drafts for Hieroglyphic Texts? In Verhoeven, U., ed., Ägyptologische “Binsen”-Weisheiten I–II. Neue Forschungen und Methoden der Hieratistik. Akten zweier Tagungen in Mainz im April 2011 und März 2013 (Einzelveröffentlichungen 14). Mainz: Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur/Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, pp. 67–84.Google Scholar
Haring, B. (2018). From Single Sign to Pseudo-Script: An Ancient Egyptian System of Workmen’s Marks. Culture and History of the Ancient Near East 93. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004357549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haring, B. (2020). The Survival of Pharaonic Ostraca: Coincidence or Meaningful Patterns? In Caputo, C. and Lougovaya, J., eds., Using Ostraca in the Ancient World: New Discoveries and Methodologies. Materiale Textkulturen 32. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 89–108.Google Scholar
Haring, B. (2023). Hieroglyphs, Pseudo-Scripts and Alphabets: Their Use and Reception in Ancient Egypt and Neighbouring Regions. Cambridge Elements – Ancient Egypt in Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781009400800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haring, B. & Soliman, D. (2014). Reading Twentieth Dynasty Ostraca with Workmen’s Marks. In Haring, B., Kaper, O., and van Walsem, R., eds., The Workman’s Progress: Studies in the Village of Deir el-Medina and documents from Western Thebes in Honour of Rob Demarée. Egyptologische Uitgaven 28. Leuven: Peeters, pp. 73–93.Google Scholar
Hassan, Kh. (2014). A Visitor’s Hieratic Ostracon Concerning the Temple of Deir el-Bahri. Bulletin de l’Institut français d’archéologie orientale, 113, 183–192.Google Scholar
Hassan, Kh. (2017). New Literary Compositions of the Scribe Amunnakhte Son of Ipuy. A Study of Hieratic Ostracon in the Egyptian Museum of Cairo. Studien zur altägyptischen Kultur, 46, 101–111.Google Scholar
Hassan, Kh. & Mekawy Ouda, M. (2018). Ramesside Hieratic Stela of the Sandal Maker Penone in the Egyptian Museum Cairo (TR. 27.6.24.3). Journal of the American Research Center in Egypt, 54, 93–105.10.5913/jarce.54.2018.a008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, W. C. (1959). The Scepter of Egypt, 2 vols. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art.Google Scholar
Helck, W. (1984). Zum Brooklyner Orakelpapyrus. In Thissen, H.-J. and Zauzich, K-Th., eds., Grammata Demotika: Festscgrift für Erich Lüddeckens. Würzburg: Zauzich, pp. 71–74.Google Scholar
Hoch, J. E. (1994). Semitic Words in Egyptian Texts of the New Kingdom and Third Intermediate Period. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400863884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornung, E. (1997). Der ägyptische Mythos von der Himmelskuh: eine Ätiologie des Unvollkommenen, 3rd ed. Orbis biblicus et orientalis 46. Freiburg: Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Izre’el, S. (1997). The Amarna Scholarly Tablets. Cuneiform Monographs 9. Leiden: Styx.10.1163/9789004676596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Izre’el, S. (2001). Adapa and the South Wind Has the Power of Life and Death Mesopotamian Civilizations 10. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
Jäger, S. (2004). Altägyptische Berufstypologien. Lingua Aegyptia Studia Monographica 4. Göttingen: Seminar für Ägyptologie und Koptologie.Google Scholar
Jansen-Winkeln, K. (2017a). “Libyerzeit” oder “postimperiale Periode”? Zur historischen Einordnung der Dritten Zwischenzeit. In Jurman, C., Bader, B., and Aston, D. A., eds., A True Scribe of Abydos: Essays on First Millennium Egypt in Honour of Anthony Leahy. Orientalia Lovaniensia Analecta 265. Leuven: Peeters, pp. 203–238.Google Scholar
Jansen-Winkeln, K. (2017b). Review of A. Stauder, Linguistic Dating of Middle Egyptian Literary Texts and G. Moers et al. (eds.), Dating Egyptian Literary Texts. Orientalia, 86, 107–134.Google Scholar
Janssen, J. J. (1987). On Style in Egyptian Handwriting. Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, 73, 161–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janssen, J. J. (1997). Review of S. Wimmer, Hieratische Paläographie der nicht-literarischen Ostraka der 19. und 20. Dynastie (1995). Bibliotheca Orientalis, 54, 338–345.Google Scholar
Janssen, J. J. (2000). Idiosyncrasies in Late Ramesside Hieratic Writing. Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, 86, 51–56.10.1177/030751330008600110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jasnow, R. (1992). A Late Period Hieratic Wisdom Text (P. Brooklyn 47.218.135). Studies in Ancient Oriental Civilization 52. Chicago: Oriental Institute.Google Scholar
Jüngling, J. (2021). Hieratische Aktenvermerke. Hieratic Studies Online 2. Mainz. Available online at https://aku.uni-mainz.de/hieratic-studies-online/.Google Scholar
Jurjens, J. (2021a). The Educational Context of a Literary Text: Some Notes on Marginalia and Drawings as Found on Material Containing The Teaching of Khety. Journal of the American Research Center in Egypt, 57, 175–196.10.5913/jarce.57.2021.a008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jurjens, J. (2021b). An Unpublished Manuscript of The Teaching of Khety (P. Turin CGT 54019). Rivista del Museo Egizio, 5, 109–128.10.29353/rime.2021.3815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jurjens, J. (2024). The Teaching of Khety & Its Use as an Educational Tool in Ancient Egypt. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Leiden.Google Scholar
Kahl, J. (2010). Archaism. UCLA Encylopedia of Egyptology. Available online at https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3tn7q1pf.Google Scholar
Kaper, O. (2010). A Kemyt ostracon from Amheida, Dakhleh Oasis. Bulletin de l’Institut français d’archéologie orientale, 110, 115–126.Google Scholar
Kitchen, K. A. (1969–1990). Ramesside Inscriptions, Historical and Biographical, 8 vols. Oxford: Blackwells.Google Scholar
Konrad, T. (2023). Cursive Hieroglyphs. In Polis, S., ed., Guide to the Writing Systems of Ancient Egypt. Cairo: Institut français d’archéologie orientale, pp. 58–61.Google Scholar
Krutzsch, M. (2017). Einzelblatt und Rolle: zur Anatomie von Papyrushandschriften. In Feder, F., Sperveslage, G., and Steinborn, F., eds., Ägypten begreifen: Erika Endesfelder in memoriam, Internet-Beiträge zur Ägyptologie und Sudanarchäologie 19. London: Golden House, pp. 213–222.Google Scholar
Krutzsch, M. (2019). Erkenntnisse und Fragen zum Schriftträger Papyrus. In Brose, M., Dils, P., Naether, F., Popko, L., and Raue, D., eds., En détail – Philologie und Archäologie im Diskurs: Festschrift für Hans-Werner Fischer-Elfert 1. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 503–513.Google Scholar
Kurth, D. (1999). Der Einfluss der Kursive auf die Inschriften des Tempels von Edfu. In Kurth, D., ed., Edfu. Bericht über drei Surveys: Materialen und Studien. Die Inschriften des Tempels von Edfu, Begleitheft 5. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, pp. 69–96.Google Scholar
Laboury, D. (2017). Tradition and Creativity: Toward a Study of Intericonicity in Ancient Egyptian Art. In Gillen, T., ed., (Re)productive Traditions in Ancient Egypt: Proceedings of the Conference held at the University of Liège 6th–8th February 2013. Aegyptiaca Leodensia 10. Liège: Presses Universitaires de Liège, pp. 229–258.Google Scholar
Laboury, D. (2022). Artistes et écriture hiéroglyphique dans l’Égypte des pharaons. Bulletin de la Societé française d’égyptologie, 207, 37–68.Google Scholar
Lacau, P. (1939). Une stèle du roi “Kamosis” . Annales du service des antiquités de l’Égypte, 39, 245–271.Google Scholar
Landrino, M. (In preparation). Hieratische Chrestomathie II: The New Kingdom. Berlin: LIT Verlag.Google Scholar
Lange, E. (2007). Kretischer Zauber gegen asiatischen Seuchen: Die kretischen Zaubersprüche in den altägyptischen medizinischen Texten. In Hannig, R., Vomberg, P., and Witthuhn, O., eds., Marburger Treffen zur altägyptischen Medizin. Vorträge und Ergebnisse 2002–2007. Göttinger Miszellen Beihefte 2. Göttingen: Seminar für Ägyptologie und Koptologie, pp. 47–55.Google Scholar
Lange, H. O. & Schäfer, H. (1908). Grab- und Denksteine des Mittleren Reichs, No. 20001–20780. Berlin: Reichsdruckerei.Google Scholar
Lazaridis, N. (2010). Education and Apprenticeship. UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology. Available online at https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1026h44g.Google Scholar
Leblanc, C. (2004). L’école du temple (ât-sebait) et le per-ankh (maison de vie). Á propos de récentes découvertes effectuées dans le contexte du Ramesseum. Memnonia, 15, 93–101.Google Scholar
Leitz, C. (1999). The Magical and Medical Papyri of the New Kingdom. Hieratic Papyri in the British Museum VII. London: British Museum Press.Google Scholar
Lenzo Marchese, G. (2004). Les colophons dans la littérature égyptienne. Bulletin de l’Institut français d’archéologie orientale, 104, 359–376.Google Scholar
Lenzo Marchese, G. (2015). L’écriture hiératique en épigraphie à l’époque napatéenne. In Verhoeven, U., ed., Ägyptologische “Binsen”-Weisheiten I–II. Neue Forschungen und Methoden der Hieratistik. Akten zweier Tagungen in Mainz im April 2011 und März 2013. Einzelveröffentlichungen 14. Mainz: Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur/Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, pp. 271–295.Google Scholar
Lenzo Marchese, G. (2023). The Book of the Dead in the Third Intermediate Period. In Lucarelli, R. and Stadler, M. A., eds., The Oxford Handbook of the Egyptian Book of the Dead. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 76–115.Google Scholar
Lepper, V. (2008). Untersuchungen zu pWestcar: Eine philologische und literaturwissenschaftliche (Neu-)analyse. Ägyptologische Abhandlungen 70. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Lichtheim, M. (1975). Ancient Egyptian Literature, Volume I: The Old and Middle Kingdom. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lieven, A. von. (2007). Grundriss der Laufes der Sterne: Das sogenannte Nutbuch. The Carlsberg Papyri 8. CNI Publications 31. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.Google Scholar
Lieven, A. von & Quack, J. F. (2018). Ist Lieben eine Frauenkrankheit? Papyrus Berlin P 13602, ein gynäkomagisches Handbuch. In Donker van Heel, K., Hoogendijk, F. A. J., and Martin, C. J., eds., Hieratic, Demotic and Greek Studies and Text Editions. Of Making Many Books There Is No End: Festschrift in Honour of Sven P. Vleeming. Papyrologica Lugduno-Batava 34. Leiden: Brill, pp. 257–274.Google Scholar
López, J. (1980). Ostraca ieratici, vol. II: n. 57093–57319. Catalogo del Museo Egizio di Torino Serie II, Collezioni 3/2. Milan: Cisalpino Goliardica.Google Scholar
Lucarelli, R. (2020). Cursive Hieroglyphs in the Book of the Dead. In Davies, V. and Laboury, D., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Egyptian Epigraphy and Palaeography. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 577–589.Google Scholar
Luiselli, M. (2003). The Colophons as an Indication of the Attitudes towards the Literary Tradition in Egypt and Mesopotamia. In Bickel, S. and Loprieno, A., eds., Basel Egyptology Prize 1: Junior Research in Egyptian History, Archaeology, and Philology. Aegyptiaca Helvetica 17. Basel: Schwabe, pp. 343–360.Google Scholar
Lüscher, B. (2015). Kursivhieroglyphische Ostraka als Textvorlagen: Der (Glücks-)Fall TT 87. In Verhoeven, U., ed., Ägyptologische “Binsen”-Weisheiten I–II. Neue Forschungen und Methoden der Hieratistik. Akten zweier Tagungen in Mainz im April 2011 und März 2013. Einzelveröffentlichungen 14. Mainz: Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur/Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, pp. 85–117.Google Scholar
Lüscher, B. (2017). Papyrus Paris, Bibliothèque Nationale 46: ein Beitrag zur frühen Rezeptionsgeschichte des Totenbuches. In Bickel, S. and Díaz-Iglesias, L., eds., Studies in Ancient Egyptian Funerary Literature. Orientalia Lovaniensia Analecta 257. Leuven: Peeters, pp. 355–374.Google Scholar
Mathieu, B. (2003). La littérature égyptienne sous les Ramsès d’après les ostraca littéraires de Deir el-Médineh. In Andreu, G., ed., Deir el-Médineh et la Vallée des Rois: la vie en Égypte au temps des pharaons du Nouvel Empire. Paris: Khéops, pp. 117–137.Google Scholar
McClain, S. E. (2018). Authorship and Attribution: Who Wrote the Twentieth Dynasty Journal of the Necropolis? In Dorn, A. and Polis, S., eds., Outside the Box: Selected Papers from the Conference ‘Deir el-Medina and the Theban Necropolis in Contact’, Liège, 27–29 October 2014. Aegyptiaca Leodiensia 11. Liège: University of Liège Press, pp. 333–364.Google Scholar
McDowell, A. (2000). Teachers and Students at Deir el-Medina. In Demarée, R. J. and Egberts, A., eds., Deir el-Medina in the Third Millenium AD: A Tribute to Jac. J. Janssen. Leiden: Nederlands Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten, pp. 217–233.Google Scholar
Meeks, D. (2007). La paléographie hiéroglyphique: une discipline nouvelle. Égypte, Afrique et Orient, 46, 3–14.Google Scholar
Megally, M. (1971). Considérations sur les variations et la transformation des formes hiératiques du Papyrus E 3236 du Louvre. Bibliothèque d’étude 49. Cairo: Institut français d’archéologie orientale.Google Scholar
Messerer, C. (2017). Corpus des papyrus grecs sur les relations administratives entre le clergé égyptien et les autorités romaines. Vol. 1. Sonderreihe der Abhandlungen Papyrologica Coloniensia 41. Leiden: Brill.10.30965/9783657788644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyanishi, M. (2016). Palaeographical Study of the Late Ramesside Letters Vol. I & II. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Liverpool. Available online at https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/id/eprint/3002144.Google Scholar
Moers, G. et al., eds., (2013). Dating Egyptian Literary Texts. Linguae Aegyptiae Studia Monographica 11. Hamburg: Widmaier Verlag.Google Scholar
Moezel, K. van der. (2022). Administrative Hieratic from dynasties 19 and 20: Case studies on selected groups of ostraca with necropolis administration. Hieratic Studies Online 4. Mainz. http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-7839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Möller, G. (1910). Das Dekret des Amenophis, des Sohnes des Hapu. Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, XLVII, 932–948, pl. VI.Google Scholar
Möller, G. (1920). Zur Datierung literarischer Handschriften aus der ersten Hälfte des Neuen Reiches. Zeitschrift für Ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde, 56, 34–43.10.1524/zaes.1920.56.jg.34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Möller, G. (1927–35). Hieratische Lesestücke für den akademischen Gebrauch, 3 vols. Leipzig: J. C. Hinrich’sche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Möller, G. (1927–36). Hieratische Paläographie: Die aegyptische Buchschrift in ihrer Entwicklung von der fünften Dynastie bis zur römischen Kaiserzeit, 3 vols. Leipzig: J. C. Hinrich’sche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Morfini, I. (2019). Necropolis Journal: Daily Records of Events in an Ancient Egyptian Artisans’ Community. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Leiden. Available online at https://hdl.handle.net/1887/68810.Google Scholar
Morris, R. (2021). Forensic Handwriting Identification: Fundamental Concepts and Principles, 2nd ed. London: Academic Press, Elsevier.Google Scholar
Möschen, S. (2021). Hieratische Chrestomathie, Teil I: Altes und Mittleres Reich. Einführungen und Quellentexte zur Ägyptologie 15. Berlin: Lit Verlag.Google Scholar
Motte, A. (2022). Kemit, Writing-boards, and Palaeographic Studies. In Gülden, S., Konrad, T., and Verhoeven, U., eds., Ägyptologische “Binsen”-Weisheiten IV. Abhandlungen der Geistes- und sozialwissenschaftliche Klasse 17. Mainz: Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur, pp. 341–383.Google Scholar
Motte, A. (2024). Learning Through Practice: On How Kemyt Contributed to Crafting and Transmitting Scribal Knowledge. Zeitschrift für Ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde, 151, 92–109.10.1515/zaes-2022-0005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Motte, A. & Sojic, N. (2020). Paratextual Signs in the New Kingdom Medico-magical Texts. In Carlig, N. et al., eds., Signes dans les textes: Continuités et ruptures des pratiques scribales en Égypte pharaonique, gréco-romaine et byzantine. Papyrologica Leodiensia 9. Liège: Presses Universitaires de Liège, pp. 57–94.Google Scholar
Munro, I. (1994). Die Totenbuch-Handschriften der 18. Dynastie im Ägyptischen Museum Cairo, 2 vols. Ägyptologische Abhandlungen 54. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Navratilova, H. (2015). Visitor’s Graffiti of Dynasties 18 and 19 in Abusir and Northern Saqqara, 2nd ed. Liverpool: Abercromby Press.Google Scholar
Ormont, H. (1902). Missions archéologique françaises en orient aux XVII et XVIII siècles, 2 vols. Paris: Imprimerie nationale.Google Scholar
Osing, J. & Rosati, G. (1998). Papiri geroglifici e ieratici da Tebtynis, 2 vols. Florence: Istituto Papirologico “G. Vitelli”.Google Scholar
Pantalacci, L. (2018). Between Old and Middle Kingdom: Palaeography of the Clay Documents from Bala. In Gülden, S. A., Van Der Moezel, K., and Verhoeven, U., eds., Ägyptologische “Binsen”-Weisheiten III. Formen und Funktionen von Zeichenliste und Paläographie. Akten der internationalen und interdisziplinären Tagung in der Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur, Mainz im April 2016. Einzelveröffentlichungen 15. Mainz: Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur/Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, pp. 217–234.Google Scholar
Pantalacci, L. (2021). Writing on Clay: Documentation from Balat (Dakhla Oasis, End of the 3rd Millennium). In Collombert, Ph. and Tallet, P., eds., Les archives administratives de l’Ancien Empire. Leuven: Peeters, pp. 297–310.Google Scholar
Parker, R. A. (1962). A Saite Oracle Papyrus from Thebes in the Brooklyn Museum [Papyrus Brooklyn 47.218.3]. Providence, Rhode Island: Brown University Press.Google Scholar
Parkinson, R. B. (1999). Cracking Codes: The Rosetta Stone and Decipherment. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Parkinson, R. B. (2004). The History of a Poem: Middle Kingdom Literary Manuscripts and their Reception. In Burkard, G., Grimm, A., Schoske, S., Verbovsek, A., eds., Kon-Texte: Akten des Symposions “Spurensuche – Altägypten im Spiegel seiner Texte” München 2. bis 4. Mai 2003. Ägypten und Altes Testament 60. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, pp. 51–64.Google Scholar
Parkinson, R. B. (2009). Reading Ancient Egyptian Poetry: Among Other Histories. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Parkinson, R. B. (2013). Sailing Past Elsinore. Interpreting the Materiality of Middle Kingdom Poetry. In Moers, G. et al., eds., Dating Egyptian Literary Texts. Lingua Aegyptia Studia Monographica 11. Hamburg: Widmaier Verlag, pp. 123–137.Google Scholar
Parkinson, R. B. (2019). Libraries in Ancient Egypt, c.2600–1600 bce. In Ryholt, K. and Barjamovic, G., eds., Libraries before Alexandria: Ancient Near Eastern Traditions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 115–167.Google Scholar
Parkinson, R. B. & Quirke, S. (1995). Papyrus. London: British Museum Press.Google Scholar
Parkinson, R. B. & Spencer, N. (2017). The Teaching of Amenemhat at Amara West: Egyptian Literary Culture in Upper Nubia. In Spencer, N., Stevens, A., and Binder, M., eds., Nubia in the New Kingdom: Lived Experience, Pharaonic Control and Indigenous Traditions. British Museum Studies on Egypt and Sudan 3. Leuven: Peeters, pp. 214–223.Google Scholar
Peden, A. J. (2001). The Graffiti of Pharaonic Egypt: Scope and Roles of Informal Writings (c. 3100–332 bc). Probleme der Ägyptologie 17. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004495678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelegrin, J., Andreu-Lanoë, G., & Pariselle, C. (2016). La production des ostraca en calcaire dans la nécropole thébaine: étude préliminaire. Bulletin de l’Institut Français d’Archéologie Orientale, 115, 325–352.Google Scholar
Pleyte, W. & Rossi, F. (1869–1876). Les papyrus hiératiques de Turin, 2 vols. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Polis, S. (2017a). Linguistic Variation in Ancient Egyptian: An Introduction to the State of the Art (with Special Attention to the Community of Deir el-Medina). In Cromwell, J. and Grossman, E., eds., Scribal Repertoires in Egypt from the New Kingdom to the Early Islamic Period. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 60–88.Google Scholar
Polis, S. (2017b). The Scribal Repertoire of Amennakhte Son of Ipuy. Describing Variation across Late Egyptian Registers. In Cromwell, J. and Grossman, E., eds., Scribal Repertoires in Egypt from the New Kingdom to the Early Islamic Period. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 89–126.Google Scholar
Polis, S. (2020). Methods, Tools, and Perspectives of Hieratic Palaeography. In Davies, V. and Laboury, D., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Egyptian Epigraphy and Palaeography. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 550–565.Google Scholar
Polis, S. (2022). The Messy Scribe from Deir el-Medina. A Paleographical Journey through the Texts of a Draughtsman and Scribe from the 19th Dynasty: Pay (i). In Gülden, S. A., Konrad, T., and Verhoeven, U., eds., Ägyptologische “Binsen”-Weisheiten IV. Hieratisch des Neuen Reiches: Akteure, Formen und Funktionen. Akten der internationalen Tagung in der Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur, Mainz im Dezember 2019. Einzelveröffentlichungen 17. Mainz: Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur/Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, pp. 405–453.Google Scholar
Polis, S. & Seyr, Ph. (2023). Enigmatic Texts from Deir el-Medina. On the Transmission and Decipherment of “cryptographic” Compositions in the Community of Workmen. Revue d́Égyptologie, 73, 117–182.Google Scholar
Popko, L. (2016). Die hieratische Stele MAA 1939.552 aus Amara West: ein neuer Feldzug gegen die Philister. Zeitschrift für ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde, 143, 214–233.10.1515/zaes-2016-0015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posener, G. (1951a). Catalogue des ostraca hiératiques littéraires de Deir el Médineh, II, Nos. 1109–1266. Documents de fouilles de l’Institut français d’archéologie orientale 18. Cairo: Institut français d’archéologie orientale.Google Scholar
Posener, G. (1951b). Sur l’emploi de l’encre rouge dans les manuscrits égyptiens. Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, 37, 75–80.Google Scholar
Posener, G. (1957). Le conte de Néferkarê et du général Siséné (recherches littéraires, VI). Revue d’Égyptologie, 11, 119–137.Google Scholar
Posener, G. (1972). Champollion et le déchiffrement de ĺécriture hiératique. Comptes rendus des séances de l’Academie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres, 116e année, 3, 566–573.Google Scholar
Posener, G. (1975). Les ostraca numérotés et le conte du revenant. In Drevnii Vostok: sbornik 1 (Festschrift Korostovstev). Moscow: ‘Nauka’, pp. 105–112.Google Scholar
Posener, G. (1976a). L’Ensignement loyaliste: sagesse égyptienne du Moyen Empire. Centre de Recherches d’Histoire et de Philologie II, Hautes études orientales 5. Geneva: Droz.Google Scholar
Posener, G. (1976b). Notes de transcription. Revue d’égyptologie, 28, 146–148.Google Scholar
Prada, L. (2018). Egyptian Education in Hellenistic and Roman Egypt: A Take from the Fayum – School Textbooks and P. Schulübung Revisited. In Chaufray, M.-P. et al., eds., Le Fayoum: Archéologie – Histoire – Religion. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, pp. 101–128.Google Scholar
Pries, A. (2022). Traditio obligat – Variatio delectat. Zur Überlieferungsdynamik altägyptischer Traditionsliteratur. Ägyptologische Abhandlungen 83. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Quack, J. F. (1994). Die Lehren des Ani: ein neuägyptischer Weisheitstext in seinem kulturellen Umfeld. Orbis biblicus et orientalis 141. Freiburg: Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Quack, J. F. (1999a). Review of P. Gallo, Ostraca demotici e ieratici. Enchoria, 25, 192–196.Google Scholar
Quack, J. F. (1999b). A New Bilingual Fragment from the British Museum (Papyrus BM EA 69574. Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, 55, 153–164.Google Scholar
Quack, J. F. (2002). Die Dienstanweisung des Oberlehrers aus dem Buch vom Tempel. In Beinlich, H. et al., eds., 5. Ägyptologische Tempeltagung: Würzburg, 23–26 September 1999. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, pp. 159–171.Google Scholar
Quack, J. F. (2006). Die hieratischen und hieroglyphischen Texte aus Tebtynis – Ein Überblick. In Ryholt, K., ed., The Carlsberg Papyri 7. Hieratic Texts from the Collection. Carsten Niebuhr Institute Publications 30. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press, pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
Quack, J. F. (2010a). Egyptian Writing for Non-Egyptian Languages and Vice Versa: A Short Overview. In de Voogt, A. and Finkel, I. L., eds., The Idea of Writing: Play and Complexity. Leiden: Brill, pp. 317–325.Google Scholar
Quack, J. F. (2010b). Difficult Hieroglyphs and Unreadable Demotic? How the Ancient Egyptians Dealt with the Complexities of Their Script. In de Voogt, A. and Finke, I. L., eds., The Idea of Writing: Play and Complexity. Leiden: Brill, pp. 235–251.Google Scholar
Quack, J. F. (2011). Textedition, Texterschließung, Textinterpretation. In Verbovsek, A., Jones, C., and Backes, B., eds., Methodik und Didaktik in der Ägyptologie: Herausforderungen eines kulturwissenschaftlichen Paradigmewechsels in den Altertumswissenschaften. Ägyptologie und Kulturwissenschaft 4. Paderborn: Wilhelm Fink, pp. 533–549.Google Scholar
Quack, J. F. (2015). Rohrfedertorheiten? Bemerkungen zum römerzeitlichen Hieratisch. In Verhoeven, U., ed., Ägyptologische “Binsen”-Weisheiten I–II: Neue Forschungen und Methoden der Hieratistik, Akten zweier Tagungen in Mainz im April 2011 und März 2013. Einzelveröffentlichungen 14. Mainz: Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur/Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, pp. 435–469.Google Scholar
Quack, J. F. (2016a). The Last Stand? What Remains Egyptian in Oxyrhynchus. In Ryholt, K. and Barjamovic, G., eds., Problems of Canonicity and Identity Formation in Ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia. CNI Publications 43. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press, pp. 105–126.Google Scholar
Quack, J. F. (2016b). Wie normativ ist das Buch vom Tempel, und wann und wo ist es so? In Ullmann, M., ed., 10. Ägyptologische Tempeltagung: Ägyptische Tempel zwischen Normierung und Individualität. München, 29–31 August 2014. Königtum, Staat und Gesellschaft früher Hochkulturen 3,5. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, pp. 99–109.Google Scholar
Quack, J. F. (2017a). On the Regionalization of Roman-Period Egyptian Hands. In Cromwell, J. and Grossman, E., eds., Scribal Repertoires in Egypt from the New Kingdom to the Early Islamic Period. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 184–210.Google Scholar
Quack, J. F. (2017b). How the Coptic Script Came About. In Grossman, E. et al., eds., Greek Influence on Egyptian-Coptic: Contact-induced Change in an Ancient African Language. Lingua Aegyptia Studia Monographia 17. Hamburg: Widmaier Verlag, pp. 27–96.Google Scholar
Quack, J. F. (2019). Demotische Verwaltungstexte in hieratischer Schrift. In Zauzich, K.-Th., ed., Akten der 8. Internationalen Konferenz für Demotische Studien. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, pp. 145–157.Google Scholar
Quack, J. F. (2020a). Eine spätzeitliche Handschrift der Lehre des Cheti (Papyrus Berlin P 14423). In Hsu, Sh.-W., Moje, J., and Laisney, V. P.-M., eds., Ein Kundiger, der in die Gottesworte eingedrungen ist. Festschrift für den Ägyptologen Karl Jansen-Winkeln zum 65. Geburtstag. Münster: Zaphon, pp. 233–251.Google Scholar
Quack, J. F. (2020b). Zwei demotische Briefe in hieratischer Schrift. In Ryholt, K., ed., The Carlsberg Papyri 15: Hieratic Texts from Tebtunis Including a Survey of Illustrated Papyri. Carsten Niebuhr Publications 45. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press, pp. 141–149.Google Scholar
Quack, J. F. (2020c). Eine Liste von Formen des Mond-Thot. In Ryholt, K., ed., The Carlsberg Papyri 15: Hieratic Texts from Tebtunis Including a Survey of Illustrated Papyri. Carsten Niebuhr Publications 45. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press, pp. 19–24.Google Scholar
Quack, J. F. (2020d). Ein alphabetisch sortiertes Handbuch der Hieroglyphenzeichen. In Ryholt, K., ed., The Carlsberg Papyri 15: Hieratic Texts from Tebtunis Including a Survey of Illustrated Papyri. Carsten Niebuhr Publications 45. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press, pp. 77–106.Google Scholar
Quack, J. F. (2021). Priestly Scholars in Late Egypt: The Theoretical Side. Journal of Ancient Near Eastern History, 8, 73–90.10.1515/janeh-2020-0014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quack, J. F. (2022). Klassisch-ägyptische Texte in späthieratischem Gewande. Zeitschrift für Ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde, 149, 91–105.10.1515/zaes-2020-0015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quack, J. F. (2023a). The Egyptian Classification of Hieroglyphs. In Polis, S., ed., Guide to the Writing Systems of Ancient Egypt. Cairo: Institut français d’archéologie orientale, pp. 140–143.Google Scholar
Quack, J. F. (2023b). Magischer Text (Demotisch in hieratischer Schrift). Papyrus Leiden Pap. Inst. P. 1000. In Hoogendijk, F. A. J. and Stolk, J. V., eds., Greek, Hieratic, Demotic and Coptic Papyri and Ostraca in the Leiden Papyrological Institute. Papyrologica Lugduno-Batava 40. Leiden: Brill, pp. 5–12.Google Scholar
Quack, J. F. (2023c). Modellbriefe als Mittel des Schreiberausbildung im Alten Ägypten. In Deichert, S., Elnoubi, M., Abdel Moaty, S. M., and Wilde, H., eds., Modelle im Alten Ägypten. Objekte der Wissens. Berlin: Kulturverlag Kadmos, pp. 79–149.Google Scholar
Ragab, M. (2024). The Workmen’s Graffiti in the Valley of the Kings. Uppsala Studies in Egyptology 7. Uppsala: Uppsala Universitet.Google Scholar
Ragazzoli, C. (2016). Genres textuels et supports matériels: une inscription de visiteur comme exercise sur ostracon (Ostracon University College 31918). NeHeT, revue numérique d’égyptologie, 4, 65–76.Google Scholar
Ragazzoli, C. (2017a). La grotte des scribes à Deir el-Bahari: la tombe MMA 504 et ses graffiti. Mémoires publiés par les membres de l’Institut français d’archéologie orientale 135. Cairo: Institut français d’archéologie orientale.Google Scholar
Ragazzoli, C. (2017b). Beyond Authors and Copyists: The Role of Variation in Ancient Egyptian and New Kingdom Literary Production. In Gillen, T., ed., (Re)productive Traditions in Ancient Egypt. Aegyptiaca Leodensia 10. Liège: Presses Universitaires de Liège, pp. 95–126.Google Scholar
Ragazzoli, C. (2019). Scribes: Les artisans du texte de l’Égypte ancienne (1550–1000). Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Ragazzoli, C., Hassan, Kh., & Salvador, C., eds. (2023). Graffiti and Rock Inscriptions from Ancient Egypt: A Companion to Secondary Epigraphy. Bibliothèque d’Étude 182. Cairo: Institut français d’archéologie orientale.10.2307/jj.20785736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ragazzoli, C. & Albert, F., eds. (2025). Questions sur la scripturalité égyptienne. Des registres graphiques aux espaces d́écriture. Bibliothèque d’Étude 192. Cairo: Institut français d’archéologie orientale.Google Scholar
Regulski, I. (2009). The Beginning of Hieratic Writing in Egypt. Studien zur Altägyptischen Kultur, 38, 259–274.Google Scholar
Regulski, I. (2010). A Palaeographic Study of Early Writing in Egypt. Orientalia Lovaniensia Analecta 195. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Ryholt, K. (2005). On the Contents and Nature of the Tebtunis Temple Library. A Status Report. In Lippert, S. and Schentuleit, M., eds., Tebtynis und Soknopaiou Nesos. Leben im römerzeitlichen Fajum. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, pp. 141–170.Google Scholar
Ryholt, K. (2018). Scribal Habits at the Tebtunis Temple Library: On Materiality, Formal Features, and Palaeography. In Cromwell, J. and Grossman, E., eds., Scribal Repertoires in Egypt from the New Kingdom to the Early Islamic Period. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 153–183.Google Scholar
Ryholt, K. (2020a). ed., The Carlsberg Papyri 15: Hieratic Texts from Tebtunis Including a Survey of Illustrated Papyri. With contributions by A. Kucharek, D. Petrova, A. H. Pries, J. F. Quack, K. Ryholt, S. Töpfer. Carsten Niebuhr Institute Publications 45. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.Google Scholar
Ryholt, K. (2020b). Demotic Documents with Hieratic Imperial Titulary. In Ryholt, K., ed., The Carlsberg Papyri 15: Hieratic Texts from Tebtunis Including a Survey of Illustrated Papyri. Carsten Niebuhr Institute Publications 45. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press, pp. 151–164.Google Scholar
Sauneron, S. (1959). Catalogue des ostraca hiératiques non littéraires de Deir el-Médineh (nos 550 à 623). Documents de Fouilles de l’Institut français d’archéologie orientale 13. Cairo: Institut français d’archéologie orientale.Google Scholar
Scalf, F. & Flannery, A. (2019). Printing God’s Words with the Devil’s Infernal Machine. News & Notes Quarterly Newsletter, 242, 18–24.Google Scholar
Schenkel, W. (2012). Die Entzifferung der Hieroglyphen und Karl Lepsius. In Lepper, V. M. and Hafemann, I., eds., Karl Richard Lepsius. Der Begründer des deutschen Ägyptologie. Kaleidogramme 90. Berlin: Kulturverlag Kadmos, pp. 37–78.Google Scholar
Schneider, T. (2023). Language Contact in Ancient Egypt. Einführungen und Quellentexte zur Ägyptologie 16. Berlin: LIT Verlag.Google Scholar
Sethe, K. (1924). Ägyptische Lesestücke zum Gebrauch im akademischen Unterricht. Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs.Google Scholar
Shaw, I. (2000), ed. The Oxford History of Ancient Egypt. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198150343.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shisha-Halevy, A. (1978). An Early North-West Semitic Text in the Egyptian Hieratic Script. Orientalia, 47, 145–162.Google Scholar
Silvestri, J. P. (2023). The Oldest Berber Text(s)? Egyptian Evidence for the Ancient Libyan Language(s). Études et Documents Berbères, 49–50, 319–348.Google Scholar
Simpson, W. K. (2003). The Literature of Ancient Egypt. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, H. & Smith, A. (1976). A Reconsideration of the Kamose Texts. Zeitschrift für Ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde, 103, 48–76.10.1524/zaes.1976.103.jg.48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spalinger, A. (2002). The Transformation of an Ancient Egyptian Narrative: P.Sallier III and the Battle of Kadesh. Göttinger Orientforschungen 4, Reihe: Ägypten 40. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Stadler, M. A. (2008). On the Demise of Egyptian Writing: Working with a Problematic Source Basis. In Baines, J., Bennet, J., and Houston, S., eds., The Disappearance of Writing Systems: Perspectives on Literacy and Communication. London: Equinox Publishing, pp. 157–181.Google Scholar
Stauder, A. (2013). Linguistic Dating of Middle Egyptian Literary Texts. Linguae Aegyptiae Studia Monographica 12. Hamburg: Widmaier Verlag.10.37011/studmon.12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stauder, A. (2020). La forme poétique de l’Enseignement de Sehetepibré. In Gabler, K. et al., eds., Text-Bild-Objekte im archäeologischen Kontext: Festschrift für Susanne Bickel. Linguae Aegyptia Studia Monographica 22. Hamburg: Widmaier Verlag, pp. 239–256.Google Scholar
Sweeney, D. (1998). Friendship and Frustration: A Study in Papyri Deir el-Medina IV–VI. Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, 84, 101–122.10.1177/030751339808400109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabin, J. A. (2023). Optical Character Recognition Applied to Hieratic. Hieratic Studies Online 5, Mainz. http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-9590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tacke, N. (2001). Verspunkte als Gliederungsmittel in ramessidischen Schülerhandschriften. Studien zur Archäologie und Geschichte Altägyptens 22. Heidelberg: Heidelberger Orientverlag.Google Scholar
Tallet, P. (2005). Un nouveau témoin des “Devoirs du vizir” dans la tombe d’Aménémopé (Thèbes, TT 29). Chronique d’Égypte, 80(159–160), 66–75.Google Scholar
Tallet, P. (2010). La fin des Devoirs du vizir. In Warmenbol, E. and Angenot, V., eds., Thèbes aux 101 portes: mélanges à la mémoire de Roland Tefnin. Turnhout: Brepols/Association Égyptologique Reine Élisabeth, pp. 153–163.Google Scholar
Uljas, S. (2013). Linguistic Consciousness. In Stauder-Prochet, J., Stauder, A. and Wendrich, W., eds., UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology. Los Angeles. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0rb1k58fGoogle Scholar
Unter, S. (2025). Multimodal Analysis and Retrieval for Fragmentary Historical Documents with Machine Learning: A Case Study on Ancient Egyptian Hieratic Papyri, PhD Dissertation, University of Basel.Google Scholar
Vandorpe, K. & Verreth, H. (2012). Temple of Narmouthis: House of the Ostraca. In the Trismegistos database. Available online at https://www.trismegistos.org/arch/archives/pdf/534.pdf. Accessed 26 September 2024.Google Scholar
Varille, A. (1968). Inscriptions concernant l’architecte Amenhotep fils de Hapou. Bibliothèque d’étude 44. Cairo: Institut français d’archéologie orientale.Google Scholar
Venturini, I. (2007). Recherches sur les exercises scolaires sur ostraca et tablettes hiéroglyphique et hiératiques dans l’Égypte pharaonique, 3 vols. Unpublished PhD thesis, Université Montpellier III.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, U. (2001). Untersuchungen zur späthieratischen Buchschrift. Orientalia Lovaniensia Analecta 99. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, U. (2015). Stand und Aufgaben der Erforschung des Hieratischen und der Kursivhieroglyphen. In Verhoeven, U., ed., Ägyptologische “Binsen”-Weisheiten I–II: Neue Forschungen und Methoden der Hieratistik, Akten zweier Tagungen in Mainz im April 2011 und März 2013. Einzelveröffentlichungen 14. Mainz: Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur/Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, pp. 23–63.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, U. (2019). Georg Möller (1876–1921): Spuren und Wahrnehmungen. In Brose, M. et al., eds., En détail: Philologie und Archäologie im Diskurs: Festschrift für Hans-Werner Fischer-Elfert. Zeitschrift für Ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde Beiheft 7. Berlin: De Gruyte, pp. 1159–1176.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, U. (2020a). Paratextual Signs in Egyptian Funerary and Religious Texts from the Saite and Early Ptolemaic Period. In Carlig, N. et al., eds., Signes dans les textes: Continuités et ruptures des pratiques scribales en Égypte pharaonique, gréco-romaine et byzantine. Papyrologica Leodiensia 9. Liège: Presses Universitaires de Liège, pp. 95–112.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, U. (2020b). Dipinti von Besuchern des Grabes N13.1 in Assiut, 2 vols. The Asyut Project 15. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.10.13173/9783447115230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verhoeven, U. (2023a). Hieratic. In Stauder, A. and Wendrich, W., eds., UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology. Los Angeles. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1fh2r94g.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, U. (2023b). A Step Back into the Past: New Kingdom Scribal Activities in the Necropolis of Asyut. In Ragazzoli, C., Hassan, Kh., and Salvador, C., eds., Graffiti and Rock Inscriptions from Ancient Egypt: A Companion to Secondary Epigraphy. Bibliothèque d’Étude 182. Cairo: Institut français d’archéologie orientale, pp. 239–253.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, U. (2023c). Writing Book of the Dead Manuscripts: Tasks and Traditions. In Lucarelli, R. and Stadler, M. A., eds., The Oxford Handbook of the Egyptian Book of the Dead. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 76–115.Google Scholar
Vernus, P. (1990). Les espaces de l’écrit dans l’Égypte pharaonique. Bulletin de la Societé Française d’Égyptologie, 119, 35–56.Google Scholar
Virey, Ph. (1887). Étude sur un parchemin rapporté des Thébes. Mémoires publiés par les membres de la Mission archéologique français au Caire, I.3. Paris: Libraire de la Societé asiatique.Google Scholar
Vleeming, S. (1991). Review of A. Gasse, Données nouvelles (1988). Enchoria, 18, 217–227.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1959). Beiträge zur Kenntnis des Schrift- und Buchwesens der alten Ägypter, Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University of Cologne.Google Scholar
Wente, E. F. (1967). Late Ramesside Letters. Studies in Ancient Oriental Civilization 33. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wente, E. F. (1990). Letters from Ancient Egypt. Writings from the Ancient World 1. Atlanta: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Wente, E. F. (2001). Scripts: Hieratic. In Redford, D., ed., The Oxford Encyclopedia of Ancient Egypt, vol. 3. New York: Oxford University Press/Cairo: The American University in Cairo Press, pp. 206–210.Google Scholar
Willems, H. (2023). Zu den eingekerbten hieratischen Zeichen auf Särgen des Mittleren Reiches aus Dayr al-Barsha. In Gerhards, S. et al., eds., Schöne Denkmäler sind entstanden: Studien zu Ehren von Ursula Verhoeven. Heidelberg: Propylaeum, pp. 611–620.Google Scholar
Wimmer, S. (1995). Hieratische Paläographie der nicht-literarischen Ostraka der 19. und 20. Dynastie, 2 vols. Ägypten und Altes Testament 28. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Wimmer, S. (2001). Palaeography and the Dating of Ramesside Ostraca. Lingua Aegyptia, 9, 285–292.Google Scholar
Wimmer, S. (2008). Palästinisches Hieratisch: Die Zahl- und Sonderzeichen in der althebräischen Schrift. Ägypten und Altes Testament 75. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Wimmer, S. (2018). Palestinian Hieratic in Non-Hebrew Context: Egyptian Numerals and Special Signs in Regions Neighboring Israel. In Shai, I. et al., eds., Tell It in Gath: Studies in the History and Archaeology of Israel; Essays in Honor of Aren M. Maeir on the Occasion of His Sixtieth Birthday. Ägypten und Altes Testament 90. Münster: Zaphon, pp. 709–721.Google Scholar
Winand, J. (1998). La pontuaction avant la ponctuation: L’organisation du message écrit dans l’Égypte pharaonique. In Defays, J.-M., Rosier, L., and Tilkin, F., eds., Á qui appartient la ponctuation? Actes du colloque international et interdisciplinaire de Liège (13–15 mars 1997). Paris: Duculot, pp. 163–177.Google Scholar
Winand, J. (2020a). When Classical Authors Encountered Egyptian Epigraphy. In Davies, V. and Laboury, D., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Egyptian Epigraphy and Palaeography. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 163–175.Google Scholar
Winand, J. (2020b). Quand le texte ne suffit plus. Éléments de réflexion sur la notion de paratexte dans l’Égypte ancienne. In Carlig, N. et al., eds., Signes dans les textes: Continuités et ruptures des pratiques scribales en Égypte pharaonique, gréco-romaine et byzantine. Papyrologica Leodiensia 9. Liège: Presses Universitaires de Liège, pp. 11–40.Google Scholar
Winand, J. (2021). Les hièroglyphes égyptiens après Kircher: la naissance de la philologie orientale au XVIIIe siècle. In Bonnet, C., Courouau, J.-Fr., and Dieu, E., eds., Lux Philologiæ, L’essor de la philologie au XVIIIe siècle. Geneva: Droz, pp. 277–326.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.0 A

The PDF of this Element conforms to version 2.0 of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG), ensuring core accessibility principles are addressed and meets the basic (A) level of WCAG compliance, addressing essential accessibility barriers.

Content Navigation

Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.

Reading Order & Textual Equivalents

Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.

Visual Accessibility

Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.

Structural and Technical Features

ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.

Save element to Kindle

To save this element to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge-org.demo.remotlog.com is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Hieratic
  • Fredrik Hagen, University of Copenhagen
  • Online ISBN: 9781009673600
Available formats
×

Save element to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Hieratic
  • Fredrik Hagen, University of Copenhagen
  • Online ISBN: 9781009673600
Available formats
×

Save element to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Hieratic
  • Fredrik Hagen, University of Copenhagen
  • Online ISBN: 9781009673600
Available formats
×