Resistance to Evidence

Mona Simion

doi:10.1017/9781009298537

- You have access
- Open access
Cited by 15
Cited by
- 15
Crossref Citations

This Book has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.

Simion, Mona 2024. Disinformation, Politically Motivated Reasoning, and Knowledge Resistance. European Review, Vol. 32, Issue. 4, p. 321.

CrossRef

Google Scholar

Patrizio, Ross F. 2024. Testimonial liberalism and the balance of epistemic goals. Philosophical Studies, Vol. 181, Issue. 11, p. 2997.

CrossRef

Google Scholar

Jarczewski, Dominik 2024. Exempting Oneself from Knowing Better. Epistemic Laziness and Conspiracy Theories. Social Epistemology, p. 1.

CrossRef

Google Scholar

Goldberg, Sanford C. 2024. Unpossessed evidence revisited: our options are limited. Philosophical Studies, Vol. 181, Issue. 11, p. 3017.

CrossRef

Google Scholar

Mace, Lilith and Simion, Mona 2024. What is reasonable doubt? For philosophical studies special issue on Sosa’s ‘epistemic explanations’. Philosophical Studies,

CrossRef

Google Scholar

Hughes, Nick 2024. Non‐ideal epistemic rationality. Philosophical Issues, Vol. 34, Issue. 1, p. 72.

CrossRef

Google Scholar

Simion, Mona 2025. Knowledge-First Epistemology.

CrossRef

Google Scholar

Broncano-Berrocal, Fernando 2025. Knowledge-first summativism about group evidence. Philosophical Studies, Vol. 182, Issue. 5-6, p. 1275.

CrossRef

Google Scholar

Flores, Carolina 2025. Identity-protective reasoning: an epistemic and political defense. Episteme, p. 1.

CrossRef

Google Scholar

Faulkner, Paul 2025. Trust and Cooperation.

CrossRef

Google Scholar

Matsumoto, Shohei 2025. Strong social anti-reductionism reexamined. Synthese, Vol. 205, Issue. 5,

CrossRef

Google Scholar

Glüer-Pagin, Kathrin and Spectre, Levi 2025. Where is the Motivation in Motivated Numeracy?. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, Vol. 16, Issue. 2, p. 481.

CrossRef

Google Scholar

Kallestrup, Jesper 2025. When do groups have evidence?. Inquiry, p. 1.

CrossRef

Google Scholar

Schmidt, Sebastian 2025. Should we respond correctly to our reasons?. Episteme, p. 1.

CrossRef

Google Scholar

Simion, Mona 2025. McKenna on Non-Ideal Epistemology. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, p. 1.

CrossRef

Google Scholar

Mona Simion, University of Glasgow

Publisher:: Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:: February 2024
Print publication year:: 2024
Online ISBN:: 9781009298537
DOI:: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009298537
Creative Commons:: This content is Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence CC-BY-NC 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/creativelicenses

Subjects:: Epistemology and Metaphysics, Philosophy: General Interest, Philosophy
Series:: Cambridge Studies in Philosophy

Information

Contents

Metrics

Accessibility

We have increasingly sophisticated ways of acquiring and communicating knowledge, but efforts to spread this knowledge often encounter resistance to evidence. The phenomenon of resistance to evidence, while subject to thorough investigation in social psychology, is acutely under-theorised in the philosophical literature. Mona Simion's book is concerned with positive epistemology: it argues that we have epistemic obligations to update and form beliefs on available and undefeated evidence. In turn, our resistance to easily available evidence is unpacked as an instance of epistemic malfunctioning. Simion develops a full positive, integrated epistemological picture in conjunction with novel accounts of evidence, defeat, norms of inquiry, permissible suspension, and disinformation. Her book is relevant for anyone with an interest in the nature of evidence and justified belief and in the best ways to avoid the high-stakes practical consequences of evidence resistance in policy and practice. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core.

‘People who deny well established truths are an obtrusive feature of the contemporary world. Mona Simion argues that such denial manifests a breach of our epistemic obligation to respond to easily available evidence. As well as shedding light on an important phenomenon, she develops new accounts of evidence, defeat, disinformation and our obligations as inquirers. This rich and wide-ranging book will be essential reading for all epistemologists, as well as anyone interested in the root causes of so much contemporary political dysfunction.'

Neil Levy - University of Oxford

- Aa Reduce text
- Aa Enlarge text

View selected items
Save to my bookmarks
Export citations
Download PDF (zip)
Save to Kindle
Save to Dropbox
Save to Google Drive
Save content to
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to .

To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge-org.demo.remotlog.com is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Please be advised that item(s) you selected are not available.
You are about to save
Your Kindle email address

Please provide your Kindle email.

@free.kindle.com @kindle.com (service fees apply)

By using this service, you agree that you will only keep content for personal use, and will not openly distribute them via Dropbox, Google Drive or other file sharing services

References

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Total number of HTML views: 0

Total number of PDF views: 0 *

Loading metrics...

Total views: 0 *

Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Resistance to Evidence

This Book has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.

Book description

Reviews

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Contents

Resistance to Evidence
pp i-i

Cambridge Studies in Philosophy - Series page
pp ii-iv

Resistance to Evidence - Title page
pp v-v

Copyright page
pp vi-vi

Dedication
pp vii-viii

Contents
pp ix-xi

Acknowledgements
pp xii-xiv

Introduction
pp 1-6

Part I - The Epistemology and Psychology of Resistance to Evidence
pp 7-92

Chapter 1 - Resistance to Evidence
pp 9-22

Chapter 2 - Evidence One Has and the Impermissibility of Resistance
pp 23-35

Chapter 3 - Evidence You Should Have Had and Resistance
pp 36-47

Chapter 4 - Permissible Suspension and Evidence Resistance
pp 48-67

Chapter 5 - Resistance to Evidence, Epistemic Responsibility, and Epistemic Vice
pp 68-92

Part II - Resistance to Evidence and Epistemic Proper Function
pp 93-148

Chapter 6 - Resistance to Evidence as Epistemic Malfunction
pp 95-110

Chapter 7 - Evidence as Knowledge Indicators
pp 111-123

Chapter 8 - Defeaters as Ignorance Indicators
pp 124-137

Chapter 9 - Inquiry and Permissible Suspension
pp 138-148

Part III - Theoretical Upshots
pp 149-191

Chapter 10 - Epistemic Oughts and Epistemic Dilemmas
pp 151-164

Chapter 11 - Scepticism as Resistance to Evidence
pp 165-177

Chapter 12 - Knowledge and Disinformation
pp 178-191

Concluding Remarks
pp 192-196

Bibliography
pp 197-214

Index
pp 215-216

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Book summary page views

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Resistance to Evidence

Book description

Reviews

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Save Search

Contents

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Book summary page views

Accessibility standard: Unknown